5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'll try to put this as simply as possible: the only reason Muslims are a threat is because some Jews open the gates to Western nations.

In Europe, it definitely wasn't the Jews who did that. As much as people want to scapegoat Jews and try to pretend that there would not be a problem if it were not for elite Jews, the rot goes very deep in the ruling classes, who care nothing about the people.

4
AntonioOfVenice 4 points ago +4 / -0

Excuse me, it's CHATSWORTH Qatarlson. Don't mutilate the very clever nicknames that these people make up for their critics.

5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fucking strange that a thread about Tucker and Islam got you so riled up and made you try to smokescreen and deflect to something else that isn't what the thread is about. Fucking odd. I wonder what would cause someone to get so angry so quickly as soon as someone criticizes Islam? Hell of a head scratcher.

Wait, so first you accuse Tucker of being a Muslim, now you claim the same for someone else who criticized you, because your peabrain can't handle that he didn't like your attack on Tucker, rather than your attack on Islam?

I'm sure here's the part where you come in and say you hate both side, glass em all and all that.

Nope, because I'm not a follower of Nietzsche. If I had to choose which is worse, Judaism or Islam, I'd say Islam, because it has way more followers. I'm not sure if it would be if they both had 1.5 billion people. However, Israel keeps creating instability, wars and civil conflict which is very bad for Europe, so your attempt to say that they didn't do anything wrong is way wide off the mark.

5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

Islam is a great evil, but it's not a "suicide cult". So he is right about that. He may be understating the extent to which Islam is an evil more generally, but that may be because neocons and others are using "Islam is bad" to try to justify more wars of aggression.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

They give themselves the antidote. It is written.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

occasionally I'm excellent

Actually, yes.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Given your response, it seems you knew full well what I was referring to.

I note that you're no longer defending the ABSOLUTE BRILLIANCE BEST WAR EVER in Iran. I guess even your ilk can learn, eh?

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

"I support Palestinian Christians."
"NAZI!"

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

People can smell that from a distance, which may be why you weren't very successful.

5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm curious, are you still claiming that the Iran War was a brilliant idea and a smashing victory for the two Epsteins?

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nah, the Christians are cool.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Perfect, although no one in Europe will know what those are.

9
AntonioOfVenice 9 points ago +9 / -0

The French know how to deal with this

There is a reason even several years ago, 2/3 of the public backed the letter of the generals.

Poor Imp of blessed memory called it a conspiracy to bring women to power. Then he backed Marine Le Pen against Eric Zemmour, and when she advanced to the second round, turned on her as well. Such a great guy.

23
AntonioOfVenice 23 points ago +23 / -0

It's not just low-income immigration that's bad. "Skilled" immigration is bad too, and not just because it drives down wages, but that's part of it.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

WW1 is notoriously complicated - it's like the Schleswig-Holstein issue and quantum mechanics rolled into one. The best explanation I know is that WW1 was caused by German fear of rising Russian power - the infamous Thucydides trap that came up a while back. England joined for balance of power reasons, and France and Italy joined for irredentism, while Austria was trying to stave off imperial collapse by a revolt of the so called submerged nations. Undoubtedly an oversimplification on all counts, but it ought to be close enough.

Obviously, ruling classes use nationalism, they don't go to war for nationalistic reasons as opposed to raison d'etat. You could argue that people would have refused to fight in such a stupid war if it were not for nationalism. But nationalism is not incompatible with refusing to fight for the stupid wars of the ruling classes, in fact, these days in Europe it is incompatible with fighting for them.

But in a time of the EU, demonizing nationalism works well. However, if you don't like nationalism, wait till you see anti-nationalism.

16
AntonioOfVenice 16 points ago +16 / -0

It's WW1 propaganda, which is blamed on nationalism.

Just explaining, not saying it's right: 'nationalism' is regarded as denigrating other peoples in a mean way or unironically hating them (unless it's Germans whom it's OK to hate).

Europeans also have no idea what America is like (same as the other way around), they tend to think that America is very 'racist', and that it has 0 social welfare systems.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

But you weren't talking about who is white and who isn't. You were talking about whether Jews assimilate. They do, and Spain proves that at least, regardless of whether you call them white, black or purple.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most Jews throughout history assimilated and disappeared as a distinct people. Look at Spanish Jews: the vast majority converted and became Spanish Catholics (some very faithful ones, Teresa of Avila had converso ancestry), while a small remainder was expelled.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dehumanizing? Sounds like common sense to me.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›