4
anonymous570861 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump is a feminist

MAGA is bigger than Trump, the philosphy was around before him and will be there after him. But you're not wrong in esessence here. Donald Trump is pretty much a 1990s liberal for better or for worse, mostly for the better, I do believe he truly loves America and wants good things for the American people.

20
anonymous570861 20 points ago +20 / -0

Nope. His recent plotlines have been talking about the evils of censorship, directly referenced the possibility of Musk buying Twitter to end censorship as a potential moment for hope/liberty/celebration, has a White Male MAGA protagonist with a traditional, Christian family, going hard on school groomers, etc...

He might look at MAGA as an alley of convience, not necessarily be MAGA himself. His cartoons are still very much Feminist Anti-Trans instead of MAGA Anti-Trans.

Also He did make this comic a few years ago. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ELiOdaGUwAAPO8i.jpg

1
anonymous570861 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's like how Buffy the Vampire Slayer was a fun character in 1998, but would be a smugger, less likable version of Brie Larson as Captain Marvel now.

Stuff like this is why I hope they never reboot MTV's Daria.

5
anonymous570861 5 points ago +5 / -0

I want nothing to do with ''The Community'' for several reasons, but the ridiculous promiscuity / STD problems is the thing that will always make be firmly stay in the permavirgin camp. ... Frankly, I wish I was straight.

Even if you manage to find a guy to be steady with, anal sex is not a good thing. To quote myself on the issue.

Anal sex should be discouraged. Anal sex makes it easier to spread disease and there is an increased chance of anal prolaspe with the act of anal sex.'

Now, you may be faithful but a future male partner may not be faithful. If he is faithful, he may not be truly honest about his sexual past in regards to STDs. And if you find someone faithful & truthful, that you truly love, you don't want him or yourself to have to deal with issues of anal prolaspe, anal leakage, and hemorrhoids.

I would highly suggest dry humping, particularly the sexual practice known as frotting/frottage. This is to gay men, what scissoring/tribbing/tribadism is to gay women. And of course, oral sex and mutal masterbation are also always better options than anal sex. Do whatever you like, that is just my unsocilited advice.

6
anonymous570861 6 points ago +6 / -0

This video is a few weeks old at this point so I am surprized to see it posted now, I misread the title as Casting Couch and thought it was a new video and a rant about actresses(& actors) having sex in exchange for movie & tv roles.

by Vsid
20
anonymous570861 20 points ago +20 / -0

Jameela Jamil Injured Her Asshole While Filming 'She-Hulk

That's her story and she is sticking to it.

24
anonymous570861 24 points ago +24 / -0

Sexual harassment laws are a bunch of unconstitutional bullshit originally made by leftwing activist courts to justify violating men's free speach in the work place. And fuck that RINO George HW Bush for making this unconstitutional bullshit into actual law. And fuck every RINO who supports these bullshit laws, and especially those RINOs who helped expanded these bullshit laws.

by Vsid
3
anonymous570861 3 points ago +3 / -0

I imagine that saying “every property is up for grabs” would give a massive advantage to mega corporations with the resources to start mass-marketing half a dozen shows at once.

No doubt about it, there should be SOME copyright. But big corporations are going to be avantaged no matter what in this particular category. Without copyright, big corps can snag up anybody's content without compensation, many content makers may not even bother if this were the case. With copyright, big corps always have the money to persaude content makers. If the content maker doesn't sell out to big corps, their family/estate likely will sell out to big corps.

A properly limited copyright is the best option. When the United States was founded, copyright was a maximum of 28 years. Sure, big corps can eventually mass produce the original content maker's content as you say, but the content maker will have time for their work to stand out on its' own while getting compensated, then EVERYONE, not just big corps, will have a chance to make their own version if they so desire, therefore actually giving competition to the big corps.

9
anonymous570861 9 points ago +9 / -0

Honestly though I think they're all sleeping on seaweed. It's not bugs, it's already food or close enough for normal people, and growing it captures CO2. But no. Got go for the shitty bug-ranching communist dystopia meme.

They want you to eat the bugs for the same reasons that they prefer Woke Washing White characters into non-White characters instead of just creating new non-White characters.

It is about humilating you, taking stuff away from you and eventually getting society to just accept it.

4
anonymous570861 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is an ok skit but the "patriarchy" part doesn't work. There is no criteria where the "patriarchy" will not be a thing for Feminists. The "patriarchy" is like the devil to Feminists, an enternal enemy that is always there and they can always blame for their real, imagined & fabricated problems.

Perhaps the line should be about a "boy's club".

18
anonymous570861 18 points ago +18 / -0

This is like that sketch where the racist and wokie realize they have so much in common.

Sure. But putting aside the fact that "racist" is some bullshit Communist term for loving your own race over others and not actually about hating other races,

being against interracial marriage/dating/breeding is not a hateful sentiment.

4
anonymous570861 4 points ago +4 / -0

I learned the news on Twitter years ago. He was one of my favorite "Anti-Woke liberal" YouTubers since he was a Men's Rights Advocate and therefore wasn't against the idea of identity politics unlike other mainstream Anti-Woke types. He also seemed to like Donald Trump from what I recall, but my memory is shit so don't take my word for it.

2
anonymous570861 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm pretty sure that it's illegal to possess things like the Anarchist's Cookbook and guides to 3D printing guns.

It is not illegal in the USA. Nor should it be illegal.

Not holding feminists accountable for this harm now will end up with us right back here in a few decades. This ends when it's treated as the threat it is.

I agree.

8
anonymous570861 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ahaus667 gets it.

10
anonymous570861 10 points ago +10 / -0

Mgtow isn’t winning, queers and pedophiles are.

And feminists.

6
anonymous570861 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hornets of Peace.

10
anonymous570861 10 points ago +10 / -0

a female does not fit the GTA series at all.

This wouldn't be the first time the GTA series had a female protagonist, GTA 1 had some female protagonists to choose from (even if all the protagonists just looked like the same tiny undetailed person during top-down 2D gameplay). But of course Woke Left writing will absolutely prevent a good female protagonist, along with good female characters period. Don't be shocked if they get rid of the prostitutes.

8
anonymous570861 8 points ago +8 / -0

GTA Vice City already did Miami.

GTA loves to repeat certain cities. GTA 1 had Liberty City, Vice City and San Andreas as stand-ins for New York City, Miami and Los Angeles respectively.

GTA 2 had Anywhere USA an unknown city set in a corporate dystopian future.

GTA London 1969 and GTA London 1963 are the only times that GTA had a city outside of the main 3 that was also real life based, and in this case, the only city that was real life named.

14
anonymous570861 14 points ago +14 / -0

Remember

when you see a White character getting replaced by a Black character,

when you see a male character getting replaced by a female character,

when you see a female character's sexuality getting defeminized,

when you see a straight character getting replaced by a LGBTwhatever character,

that a group of anti-White anti-male satanic rootless cosmopolitans did this.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›