Isn't it a platform rule? Even if it isn't, is that what you're going with, "intentionally returning to places I'm not wanted and engaging in the same behavior repetitively isn't technically against the rules!"
I mean.. 'aight.. if you want...
"No. The first amendment means our institution gets to say whatever it wants, and you the citizen should go to jail if we don't like what you say."
Anyways.. this lady is crazy. On the board at Signal. Former CEO of wikipedia. Member of the CFR, the World Bank, and the Atlantic Council. Literally the type of person NPR would spend all day taking a shit on, and now she runs the place.
These corrupt fucks will stop at nothing. They're going to insert themselves into every last corner of our democracy until they destroy it under the weight of their collective stupidity.
Anyways.. I hope this bitch is vaccinated.
This is a forum.
It's for banter.
You clearly have no problem breaking the rules yourself and creating additional accounts to circumvent the ban. You're a hypocrite hoping to cast blame on everyone else for the same thing so you don't have to change your ways.
blech.
"He has been on the board of the Alamo Square Neighborhood Association. In the early 2000s, he worked to stop fast-food franchises such as Burger King and Domino's from moving into Alamo Square. Preston owns stock shares valued between $400,000 and $4 million in Apple, Microsoft, IBM and Cisco."
ah.. that kind of guy.. if he's so concerned, why not invest in grocery stores then, Dean?
jews think stirring up "anti semitism" is funny. it's also political capital. parading around 'we're special because god' in 2024 should get you permanently ignored. they know what they're doing and they should be ashamed.
as if we need more people to die in the desert on a complete fucking lie.
fucking hebes.. of course.. looking for someone else to fund it..
We are not getting out of this without bloodshed the likes of which western countries haven't seen for 300 years.
That's already happening, they're just good at distracting everyone, so it's not really shown anywhere. This is why the "optics fags" exist, because it's obviously tangential to the "permission" model of achieving an audience.
We're slowly moving away from that but we're between two worlds at the moment. Things like a legitimate cryptocurrency would definitely help there, but a half assed one can work too, anything to break up the old "natural" monopolies of the past.
If every person who ever publicly asked the question "why are there so many blacks in prison?"
So.. if I want to invoke this as an indication there's something wrong inside the "black community" then I should go to jail? If I use it as a defense in an argument as to why I don't "default trust" black people? Jail?
was arrested, spent the night in jail, and was charged a hefty fine the world would be a better place.
Is that like your biggest fear.. spending a night in jail? What do you think happens in jail?
You can't defeat marxism under a liberal framework
"You have to remove liberty to fight those who would remove liberty from you."
k.
"The people getting mad at this don't understand that this is the current mainstream narrative. This narrative is being broadcast because it's currently useful to whoever holds power. Which is obvious, because the person pictured has no power in our society, so there's no reason for the Bee to 'make fun' of this particular strawman."
The Germans, even when losing, never conscripted blacks into their army. They didn't hate blacks and had no real official policy towards them other than they couldn't marry and mix with Whites. They would have just preferred if they all stayed in Africa.
The French had no problem doing so, raiding africa, and turning anyone they could find in a "colony" into a "drafted soldier." They took hundreds of thousands of blacks and made them fight.
"interesting buddy relationship with another man."
"So.. he's gay? Like, gay for wolverine. Which, if that's what you want, whatever, but isn't it against your own 'homophobia' rules to say it that way? Just say he's gay for wolverine."
it's easier when you have someone present to make quick adjustments on the fly
Even in Apollo the humans were pretty far out of the loop. They had landing site selection and some variable thrust control. Their option was to trip an abort switch which would then automate the abort procedure.
The Russian probe that got pancaked last year might have been saved if someone had been on board to realize the automatic system was not functioning.
It might have not crashed into the moon. The ultimate result would have been the same. They wouldn't have had fuel for a second chance, the abort procedure prevents you from slamming into the moon, but it doesn't care about your ultimate orbit, so tons of station keeping would be required just to try a second time, and there's no recovery mission that's going to go get the thing.
It slammed into the moon because there was no point in adding an abort system and it was the most cost effective solution given the above.
That's why I said putting a craft on Mars is relatively easier. I was referring to a side by side comparison, not the trips required to get there.
To put something somewhere you have to get it there. You can ignore that as an engineering challenge if you like, but then your analysis will be wrong.
Welcome to Equality. As a man I'm not allowed to let other people step in on my behalf without having to openly recognize that I'm some kind of pussy.
You wanted the slot. You got it, stupid.