to be fair, a lot of normies are still programmed to instantly dismiss anything if it criticizes someone who is Jewish. if you want normie acceptance, it is better to focus on the individuals, organizations, and what they are doing.
Take the Soros conspiracy for instance. George Soros is a rich asshole who spends his money installing activist judges and funding riots. there's plenty reason to hate him. but the moment the Soros conspiracy gained traction, it was instantly put down by a single narrative: George Soros is jewish, therefore the Soros conspiracy is antisemitic. This worked.
the individual is an asshole because they are an asshole. their assholery may be influenced by their Creed or religion, but at the end of the day it is their choice to be an asshole. if you want support, focus less on their faith and more on them as individuals.
Optics fags are usually retarded, but they are right about one thing. We do need to actually sell our ideas to people, instead of just screaming in our bubble.
Part of that is knowing when to push or downplay things to better market it to the audience we wish to court. Normally, this will mean not being a sperg and screaming about Jews and Niggers directly and outright when making a point because, as you said, it makes everyone tune out immediately.
We are not getting out of this without bloodshed the likes of which western countries haven't seen for 300 years.
That's already happening, they're just good at distracting everyone, so it's not really shown anywhere. This is why the "optics fags" exist, because it's obviously tangential to the "permission" model of achieving an audience.
We're slowly moving away from that but we're between two worlds at the moment. Things like a legitimate cryptocurrency would definitely help there, but a half assed one can work too, anything to break up the old "natural" monopolies of the past.
to be fair, a lot of normies are still programmed to instantly dismiss anything if it criticizes someone who is Jewish. if you want normie acceptance, it is better to focus on the individuals, organizations, and what they are doing.
Take the Soros conspiracy for instance. George Soros is a rich asshole who spends his money installing activist judges and funding riots. there's plenty reason to hate him. but the moment the Soros conspiracy gained traction, it was instantly put down by a single narrative: George Soros is jewish, therefore the Soros conspiracy is antisemitic. This worked.
the individual is an asshole because they are an asshole. their assholery may be influenced by their Creed or religion, but at the end of the day it is their choice to be an asshole. if you want support, focus less on their faith and more on them as individuals.
Optics fags are usually retarded, but they are right about one thing. We do need to actually sell our ideas to people, instead of just screaming in our bubble.
Part of that is knowing when to push or downplay things to better market it to the audience we wish to court. Normally, this will mean not being a sperg and screaming about Jews and Niggers directly and outright when making a point because, as you said, it makes everyone tune out immediately.
That's already happening, they're just good at distracting everyone, so it's not really shown anywhere. This is why the "optics fags" exist, because it's obviously tangential to the "permission" model of achieving an audience.
We're slowly moving away from that but we're between two worlds at the moment. Things like a legitimate cryptocurrency would definitely help there, but a half assed one can work too, anything to break up the old "natural" monopolies of the past.