18
WeedleTLiar 18 points ago +18 / -0

aren't allowed

Laws are downstream from culture.

Why shouldn't I be allowed to recover my property? Especially in this case, where it's how I pay my bills. If my kids go hungry because of "mere" theft, how is that different from the thief starving them directly?

14
WeedleTLiar 14 points ago +14 / -0

That sounds more like it is a biological issue but successful societies created strict rules to control for it.

9
WeedleTLiar 9 points ago +9 / -0

Nons aren't in Britain because of the land, they want to parasitise the prosperity of the people.

Wherever you run, they will follow.

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think they've had enough sun...

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

Even niggers hate niggers. They survive in small groups (30-40) if they can release their stress through gang rape and genital mutilation.

But if you get a few hundred together? They're just going to start attacking each other at random.

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

What makes him think those aren't the parents? Just leave the baby in the car, or you'll miss the chimp out.

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's partly because the "greater good" line has been heavily co-opted by bad actors; see Israel.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Never said they were; "allowing themselves to be used" means you are responsible for whatever evil use you're put to.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's why you have a shot with millenials.

Holocaust bad. Jews? Jews also bad. Who did the Holocaust hurt?

millenial brain explodes

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure, but your mind goes right to the Nazis. Not the Holodomr, not the Great Leap Forward, not the Armenian Genocide, not Rwanda, etc, etc.

Why do you think that is?

11
WeedleTLiar 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yep, the real uncomfortable truth; the "system" is made of people who allow themselves to be used in it's service, even though they could be converted to your cause given the right circumstances. If you can't stomach taking those people out, you'll never defeat the system.

Turner Diaries (briefly) grapples with this.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's their escape route; they had a better chance taking the guards by surprise than defending their own helicopter during the extraction.

14
WeedleTLiar 14 points ago +14 / -0

Don't forget that an actual contractor then approaches them and says "I wouldn't have taken a job like that, knowing the risks". Especially since the first DS blowing up a central planet as an example to those who oppose the Empire, amd it's subsequent, unlikely, destruction, would have been common knowledge.

This is actually one of the small acts of virtue we can, and should, all engage in; don't work for scum bags. Do what you have to do, but do everything you can to work for good people and avoid helping those taking advantage of you.

6
WeedleTLiar 6 points ago +6 / -0

So the new Bond game came out which, of course, prompted me to go back and play 007.

The vast majority of people you kill in that game are "innocent".

The dam level is a chemical plant that the guards are defending from thieves/terrorists (realistically, it would be morally better to kill the scientists making the chemicals than killing the guards stopping them from falling into the wrong hands).

Severnaya 1 is just you checking out why they're excavating a new facility; you kill dozens of guards.

Silo is just a soviet satelite launch facility that happens to be launching the Goldeneye. Again, dozens.

Sevsrnaya 2 is killing Russian troops investigsting the same terrorists you're chasing in order to keep a lid on MI6's involvement.

Statue Park and the whole Russian sequence is basically just killing police officers.

The only levels in which you are explicitely killing bad guys are Frigate and when you actually storm Janis' base.

But, if you read the briefings, it's made clear that more people will die if you don't do these things (chemicals used in terror attacks on civilians traced back to the Facility, Goldeneye would be used against allied targets, etc).

So these things are usuallu justified, morally; though you could go a bit more in depth, would it help these stories to do so?

6
WeedleTLiar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nah, he took the job, he gets the flak.

I've quit jobs over the company being shitty to customers. I don't lie for money. I don't cover for incompetence.

If the phone tech is polite and competent, even though I have serious beef with his employers, he's dealt with politely. But if he tries to play the fuck-around games the company wants him to use on customers, he gets the find-out.

26
WeedleTLiar 26 points ago +26 / -0

Okay, who had "Israel takes advantage of the ceasefire to sneak attack Iran" this month?

Oh, everyone? Even the Zio-cuck Boomers?

Shiiiiieeeet...

27
WeedleTLiar 27 points ago +27 / -0

Can you imagine that every movie you've ever seen was wrong?

Boomers can't.

6
WeedleTLiar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hitlet's Germany

Hmmm, getting started but not quite there...

Why would you use Germany's "genocide" as a comparison, rather than a larger one actually perpetrated by Jews (ie Yagoda's Holodomr)?

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're treating the symptoms, not the disease...

7
WeedleTLiar 7 points ago +7 / -0

I gather there are power features that MS has which makes it appealing for big businesses (although I've never used them) but why do governments use MS? They don't give a flaming fart about compatibility or efficiency so why don't they all go with the free option by default?

6
WeedleTLiar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ah, I see the problem; someone let these women out of the kitchen.

Time to learn to do something useful, ladies.

36
WeedleTLiar 36 points ago +36 / -0

-Illegally attacks Iran.

-Fails to acheive military victory.

-Has economy destroyed by (actually effective) Iranian "sanctions".

-Cries to UN.

Analysis...you's a bitch

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›