Three Feminists Slowly Realise They Are The Villains
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
One of the parts I found interesting was when they, and Sargon commenting, were talking about how the bad economy affects everyone, men and women, and yet women are filled with much more resentment and radicalized hatred about it. Now we know that women are actually affected less by the bad economy, due to them having more jobs, higher paying jobs, more training spots, more government programs available to them, and the option to always get some male sucker to pay for them by pretending to be interested.
But assume that men and women are both affected equally by bad times (though we know that isn't true). Women still react to it with more vitriol and seething rage then men. And I speculate that goes all the way back to how girls are raised by White men pretty much everywhere. Fathers love treating their daughters like princesses. Girls learn from a very young age the tears at the right time, a smile at the right time, gets them their way. Men are seemingly biologically driven to be much easier on their daughters than their sons. Women learn about the 'girl bonus' as they form sapience, and it becomes internalized around the same time they're learning to walk and talk.
Girls learn to expect easy mode and for someone to wipe their tears and solve any problem for them from birth, and they grow up expecting this is the nature of the universe. So when they finally get even a whiff of actual hard times, it's a much harder slap in the face to them. Boys on the other hand tend to learn to suck it up and deal with when faced with any adversity, so when they get old and life hands them Shit Sandwich #9,267, they are more likely to once again suck it up and deal with it.
I was watching a Dank video from maybe a month ago, and I remember a part where he went off on a tangent about how children need to be disciplined and need to be smacked around a bit when they misbehave and need to learn to deal with consequences and so on. But even Dankula then said something along the lines of 'But not my girls though. My daughters, I just can't do it. My boys, sure. But my girls, nah. When they look up at me, I just can't'.
It just struck me as a moment of "even Count Dankula, who tends to be pretty hard boiled on most things, still has that instinctual 'I have to shield my daughters from all adversity even when I know it's unhealthy for them in the long term." reaction. I'm not sure it's something we know how to fix or even if it can be. That feeling seems to be genetic, and I have no idea how our great great grandparents were able to keep a lid on it enough to raise daughters to not be spoiled brats who demand everything simply because they exist. Even the most 'based' right wing dads of today seem totally unable to do it.
This isn't a biological issue. All tribal societies had strict rules for girls. This is a modern issue. Read the books by Theodore Daleymple. He goes into detail how strict the Brits were in the Victorian era towards women. Women who slept around got sent to the asylum or left to die in the gutter. Not like today where single mom's are venerated. This tendency of spoiling women rotten seems to be an American attitude as Americans were always softer on women then European cultures. Some old Manosphere author dug up old church (as in Middle Ages) sermons where women were flat out blamed for the fall of men, all blame for the garden thrown onto Eve. The rules for women were legitimately strict back then.
That sounds more like it is a biological issue but successful societies created strict rules to control for it.
Except the Anglo societies are the only ones who removed the rules for girls. And even the most baseline hunter gather society has strict rules on women. That would indicate those rules evolved pretty early on.
Thanks for the recommendation.
Women worship is something only modern, white societies do. No one else anywhere on earth behaves that way. It's biological only in the sense that whites had it beaten into them for centuries so now it feels instinctual, but it's really not.
My real, honest opinion is if white men can't get this pathetic woman worship out of their system, it's going to be their downfall.
Agreed.
You're overthinking it. Women react to stimulus more emotionally. That's it. Something is bad for men, they acknowledge it, and understand that they'll have to deal with it. Something is 80% as bad for women, they think it is literally the end of the world, and start demanding that we delete thousands of years of civilization to overcome the inconvience.
Maybe there's an element of being sheltered, but even without that, you've got basic behavioral dimorphism.
This is a useful phrase.
Eggs expensive. Sperm cheap. Everything else is downstream.
I don’t think they do realize it. He wants to believe- and comforting truths makes for great subscribers
I like Sargon and don't mind these types of videos of reacting/reviewing another video but holy shit let the video play for more than three seconds before you pause it and comment on it.
YouTube is very copyright-strike happy if the commentator doesn't do exactly that.
There was a good reason I stopped watching him but forgot. I stopped watching a lot of youtubers around convid so maybe he had a really dumb take back then. Idk.
Yeah I think he just wasn't based enough for me to care anymore.
Sargon is truly a midwit. Great representation of the fedora-tipping hoi polloi, though.
They might have demonstrated to an astute audience that they are the villians, but they themselves realized nothing.