4
Soperp 4 points ago +5 / -1

trans are 99% men trying to be women so it's an outbreak among men

2
Soperp 2 points ago +2 / -0

everything is cope besides sliding between them walls

1
Soperp 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess but I think it's really a symbol showing the roman empire never died and is still in control

1
Soperp 1 point ago +1 / -0

yeah I guess really the cross is a symbol of ressurection, they "took it back" I get that

4
Soperp 4 points ago +5 / -1

early christians probably thought they were being edgy and "taking it back" like the roman empire used crosses as a symbol of fear to make people stay in line or else they get tortured up on the cross. Still, it's an essentially passive thing to use your oppressors symbol. They also used the fish symbol for Jesus but that's not as prevalent.

-1
Soperp -1 points ago +6 / -7

i think all the cross imagery would offend jesus if he ever came back too

6
Soperp 6 points ago +6 / -0

he criticized bush, who was pretty bad so made jon look good. But he fully supported obama and that was 2008 so you shouldn't be surprised now

8
Soperp 8 points ago +8 / -0

it doesn't matter how much gold there is it's all relative, it's just better than fiat based on nothing. You can use dollars to buy gold but the dollars are really IOUs that nations could use to get their gold back from where it was stored, that's what convertibility means here

8
Soperp 8 points ago +9 / -1

no the opposite

2
Soperp 2 points ago +3 / -1

really besides his currency he was trying to unite all of Africa, that couldn't be allowed.

2
Soperp 2 points ago +3 / -1

we've seen the rhetoric from dems trying to turn USA citizens anti russia after were allies since the cold war, it's probably mainly to help them win elections with a boogeyman, they made up the trump russia connection for example. Putin probably saw that as a threat.

3
Soperp 3 points ago +4 / -1

not a good reason to just give up and allow more to be on the border, good to keep the nukes aimed at you as low as possible, they can survive a certain amount but at some point it is too much.

2
Soperp 2 points ago +2 / -0

his finite lifespan is an important factor, but a good king would just expand his kingdom as much as realistically possible and then leave a strong nation to his son to be the new king of.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›