100%

The real virus is fear

Really? What exactly did they allow their staff to say? I'm sure you wouldn't say so if they were just pointing out weird congruencies with Google search and saying that it's not good journalism to spam articles for high visibility. That would be rather tame for a legal threat.

Ok, I think I understand the confusion. You are correct that there is no direct proof of Valnet paying for visibility for any of its subsidiaries (screenrant). It is heavily implied when the pieces are put together, and I instantly assumed it was the obvious conclusion based on the circumstances.

Valnet has threatened legal action over a series of articles and social media posts. The threat itself is suspicious. If all they were doing is spamming articles, what would it matter for some internet journo to point it out? But if there is money changing hands behind the scenes then the threat makes much more sense.

Not nearly as big an issue as paying for search engine visibility which was my take away.

Wait, isn't the complaint that Valnet (and possibly other companies) are paying Google for visibility on their search engine?

Do you know if he's the one that wrote in Cadswain the gurlboss, or was she from Jordan?

Saw the words "Google" and "Jigsaw" next to eachother and knew it was going to be a horror story

I thought everybody knew the soviets won ww2

according to conservatives "Antifa are the real fascists"

The fallacy here is assuming that one cannot be a communofascist. They will execute the will of "the people" by force with coordination from various corporations as well as media. Corporate backing was one of the strongest indications of fascism in antifa.

The proof that it's not real: they claim to love the Nuremberg Trial, but also loved mandates for untested gene therapies.

That's weird that they say John Booth was an acclaimed actor. They even mention his brother, Edwin, who was by all accounts the much more accomplished actor. John was seen as rather mediocre by comparison. Makes the whole thing seem off.

I hit upon a surefire pumpkin pie recipe that yields a pie of similar consistency to those bought in the store but with much better flavor.

Easy version: 1 can pumpkin puree (15-16oz), 8 oz cream cheese (soft), 3 large eggs, ½ cup butter (melted), 1½ cups brown sugar, 2 tablespoons cinnamon, 4 teaspoons ginger, ½ teaspoon ground clove, ¼ teaspoon allspice, 1 teaspoon salt, 2 pie shells, optional: mix a few tbspoons cinnamon and sugar as a topping

Preheat oven to 350°, mix all filling ingredients in large bowl (electric mixer will keep the filling smooth, otherwise you will get tiny bubbles of cream cheese), fill shells and bake ~45 minutes. You're looking for the filling to be mostly firm but still wobbly in the center. If you're doing the cinnamon-sugar topping then put it on now. Turn off the oven and let the pie cool in the oven with the door slightly open for another 45 minutes or so.

Hard version: same as above but with 1-2 sugar pumpkins instead of puree, and make your own pie shells (not covered here). Cut pumpkins in half, remove the tough outer layer and boil the flesh either in water with a few tablespoons of butter, or in beef broth. I recommend the latter. Boil for 20 minutes then strain thoroughly. Pumpkin should be soft enough to mash, but not soft enough to disintegrate.

And he still wants to pump babies full of aluminum nanoparticulates. Yeah, the honesty about covid nonsense is great, but how about consistency of application?

Does this mean the CDC found the documentation for the pictures it used to "verify" monkeypox?

After seeing what our official experts are capable of lying about, we should wonder what's been lied about by their forebears. It's possible that the indirect-correlation-equals-causation-evidence is not a model of obscuring causation of diseases to monetize bogus preventatives, but we need transparency and hard evidence to know for sure.

Yeah, it's the same stuff. I got the name wrong though: carmine, not incarnadine. It's one of the most common "edible" red dyes in the world unfortunately. It's practically impossible to find ketchup made without it.

This is on par with severely autistic people arguing for more vaccines because they think autism is better than the risk of having a sniffle

I think every country allows incarnadine. Not saying it's good, but I don't think it's been banned anywhere yet.

Weird how giving up guns did fuck all to prevent criminal attacks. Must have been knives that were the real problem. This will surely be fixed in a way that allows pensioners to be arrested over table cutlery.

Still hilarious to me how many people they managed to convince that fascism is a right wing ideology

This seems likely to me as well. It also has the drawback that starving people in heavily populated areas may turn on eachother instead of banding together.

1. Normies are dumb and blind. Not saying that to attack, only to highlight the general reception of nonsense from "the people in the TV" as gospel truth. Believe it or not, there are fully autonomous adults that would ask, "Why would the news lie to me?"

2. MS news media is the propaganda outlet of the uniparty, so yes.

Yew got a loicense for them internets yew bean veiwin?! We keeps a list of everyone that buys a cellphone/modem/router.

I thought about it a while before responding.

Saving a religion by breaking its commandments sounds a lot like saving democracy by shutting down democratic processes. On the other hand, due to the unfathomable and ineffable nature of the divine, such actions could easily fall into the category of murders done in times of war/crusade.

In the end, I think maintaining a cohesive religion of that size without having that leeway to condone "inexcusable" actions is just as impossible as preventing 100% of the possible corruption of the organization. And honestly, I can't think of a more effective way of removing corruption within an organization.

I'll be the first to admit my understanding of catholic practice is not complete. Is the pope chosen directly by the cardinals or through every catholic church constituent voting? If it's the latter, then yes, that's definitely the way to do it, but if it isn't how should the people get the cardinals to do this?