Good luck. The FBI has already cleaned (literally) the crime scene. They hosed down the roof (because that's an important thing to do, right?). If there were other shooters, I'm sure those locations have been cleaned as well.
Just like how they fixed the asphalt after the Las Vegas shooting. The FBI also has cleaning and blacktop repair operations -- who knew?!
He plays the audio many many times.
He's not made any claims about a shooter being on the water tower. His claim about the water tower is that it is inexplicable that they wouldn't have posted someone on it.
The audio suggests that it's more likely that the first three shots came from inside a building.
Better 2nd shooter theory, with non-retarded evidence: Audio Analysis is 100% Clear: Trump & Crowd Were Shot At By Two Separate People
Summary: the audio for the first 3 shots sounds completely different than the next 5 or 6 shots; there is no echo, it sounds slightly muffled. The first shot appears to have hit the top of the bleachers, slightly above Trump, which suggests an upward angle, not a downward angle. The reports from the gunshots are timed differently, which would only happen if they were fired from (at the very least) different weapons, but probably different distances as well.
I clicked Don Jr's RNC speech link to see his speech and was greeted with this dude. I listened to the first couple of sentences and my only thought was, "that's all well and good, but did you ever have any interest in suing them for anti-Whiteness? Or do we only care when Jews are burdened with collective guilt?"
Hell, if I had to guess, I'd assume that he'd be happy to work on the other side of a civil litigation suit when some evil white supremacist dared to sue for being discriminated against based on race (let alone being forced to take classes that told him how evil he was).
Then I skipped through the the rest and the following couple of speakers who also whined about Nazis and rah-rah'd for Israel (to thunderous applause).
Fortunately, neither Jr. or his daughter's speeches had nothing to do with any of that shit.
It sucks, but it is what it is, and we're not going to get any better on this election cycle.
Maybe.
But I doubt it.
I think Mike Benz is the most credible-sounding person I've found on this subject and he's very much of the opinion that the foreign policy apparatus of the CIA is completely out of control, to the point that it is now also completely taking over the domestic affairs of the US.
Victoria Nuland says one thing, George Bush says another on the campaign trail.
What Victoria Nuland says ends up happening.
Victoria Nuland says another thing, Barack Obama says another on the campaign trail.
What Victoria Nuland says ends up happening.
Victoria Nuland says a third thing, Donald Trump says another on the campaign trail. 4 years of the most obvious, petty weaponization of the government against the Trump administration ensues. Victoria Nuland's plan ends up mostly happening anyway.
I do not believe that the president has much control over it at all.
Hell, I was 100% on-board the "Bush is a war criminal!" train before Obama was elected.
Then during Obama I was like, "oh, none of them are actually in charge of anything related to foreign policy."
He's not what I thought he was in 2001-2008, but he's still an establishment piece of shit.
I won't claim one way or another, but I will say that after his Covid and financial reporting, I'd seriously consider anything that Martensen says.
If I were guessing and there were two shooters, I'd say that the second shooter was the one that took the shot that grazed Trump's ear, and the patsy (let's face it, even if he was the lone shooter, he was a patsy) took the rest. The ear shot was a perfectly placed kill shot; Trump just moved at the last instant.
I don't really have an opinion one way or the other on a second shooter, except that it would make it make sense as to why there was no friendly security posted on the water tower.
I do not believe that they were incompetent enough to just not think to use the highest easily accessible point that gave them eyes on the entire event.
And "we didn't put someone on that roof because it was pitched (at like 8 degrees) and wasn't safe" ... as they had snipers on other roofs with steeper pitches ... that's just insultingly stupid. Nobody believes that (except perhaps the DEI idiot running the Secret Service).
Chris Martenson at Peak Prosperity has been going off the past few days. He's, uh, kind of had it with the "incompetence" and the Mockingbird Media disinterest in asking substantive questions.
This video breaks down the shooter positions and where the bullets went, includes 3 eyewitness news segments that I had somehow not seen yet in which 3 people claim that they heard shots from both the roof and the water tower.
Other videos of his worth checking out: Be Careful, We’re Entering the Wild & Unpredictable Stage - Peak Prosperity and Trump Assassination Attempt... What happened, What's Next?
I'd say of all of the coverage I've looked at over the past few days, these 3 videos are probably the best and most cogent breakdowns of not only the assassination attempt, but also the state that we are in with the utterly evil, corrupt cretins that currently occupy our government.
Yeah, was pretty nice back in the early '00s and even into the '10s, but it's fallen off a cliff in the last 5-10 years.
I was visiting friends once shortly after Obama was elected ... one of them went off on this weird rant about how the his election was somehow bad because it would be used as an excuse to show that racism isn't a very big deal any more. I mostly ignored and shrugged it off at the time but now see it as an indicator of where we're at now.
I haven't talked with said friend since about 2015; last I saw he was a queer polyamorous activist who constantly whined about how he didn't make more money at his career of ... working a ticket counter at a movie theater.