Summary: the audio for the first 3 shots sounds completely different than the next 5 or 6 shots; there is no echo, it sounds slightly muffled. The first shot appears to have hit the top of the bleachers, slightly above Trump, which suggests an upward angle, not a downward angle. The reports from the gunshots are timed differently, which would only happen if they were fired from (at the very least) different weapons, but probably different distances as well.
That's very interesting! I had no reason to believe a second shooter, but the audio doesn't lie. ~Someone will need to explain it away better than this guy.~ Before I had just assumed the later shots were multiple counter-sniper rounds. They killed Crooks with one but that doesn't mean others didn't take shots.
Edit: I found a response thread from another analyst who convincingly dismisses both the second shooter and water tower theories. The gunshots on some videos sound different because of microphone direction, and the water tower doesn't have a line of site to the stage. u/Kienanu/evilplushie.
That's better evidence, if they actually play it, than that guy who did a forty minute video and then said "subscribe to my Patreon to hear the audio" or whatever. LOL.
Oh, this is that same guy. I hope he's at least actually playing the audio this time around. I'll check it out tomorrow. He's also one of the 'water tower' people, so we'll see.
He's not made any claims about a shooter being on the water tower. His claim about the water tower is that it is inexplicable that they wouldn't have posted someone on it.
The audio suggests that it's more likely that the first three shots came from inside a building.
Better 2nd shooter theory, with non-retarded evidence: Audio Analysis is 100% Clear: Trump & Crowd Were Shot At By Two Separate People
Summary: the audio for the first 3 shots sounds completely different than the next 5 or 6 shots; there is no echo, it sounds slightly muffled. The first shot appears to have hit the top of the bleachers, slightly above Trump, which suggests an upward angle, not a downward angle. The reports from the gunshots are timed differently, which would only happen if they were fired from (at the very least) different weapons, but probably different distances as well.
That's very interesting! I had no reason to believe a second shooter, but the audio doesn't lie. ~
Someone will need to explain it away better than this guy.~ Before I had just assumed the later shots were multiple counter-sniper rounds. They killed Crooks with one but that doesn't mean others didn't take shots.Edit: I found a response thread from another analyst who convincingly dismisses both the second shooter and water tower theories. The gunshots on some videos sound different because of microphone direction, and the water tower doesn't have a line of site to the stage. u/Kienan u/evilplushie.
That's better evidence, if they actually play it, than that guy who did a forty minute video and then said "subscribe to my Patreon to hear the audio" or whatever. LOL.
Oh, this is that same guy. I hope he's at least actually playing the audio this time around. I'll check it out tomorrow. He's also one of the 'water tower' people, so we'll see.
He plays the audio many many times.
He's not made any claims about a shooter being on the water tower. His claim about the water tower is that it is inexplicable that they wouldn't have posted someone on it.
The audio suggests that it's more likely that the first three shots came from inside a building.