muh beauty standards
Men may define beauty standards (for obvious reasons) but women are the ones policing them
Let's see, he called the coof shot a psyop and he called troons in sports "psychopaths". My guess is they gave him the "don't call us, we'll call you" treatment. But to be fair, maybe he saw Shankar was involved in the project and chose to steer away from this pile of burning garbage
When marxists are faced with the results of their failed ideology they can't help but to double down.
She illustrates this point by saying that while pundits on the left strive to educate people about policy, pundits on the right are likely to spend more time having long, unstructured conversations like what you'd find on the Joe Rogan Experience.
Left wingers have to give you these long lectures about why they are right and why being miserable is your fault. Right wingers just have to point obvious things everyone has been conditioned to ignore
Oof, anything but the money
It's the same for all those "progressive" causes. It's cognitive dissonance, they are trying to rationalize why some groups of people lag behind in certain areas, so they end up overcompensating.
They want to normalize this narrative about africans being the best warriors, who only lost because white people had guns. They want you to believe Yasuke was this revered figure the japanese people embraced and he became a samurai because just how competent he was when given a chance. When in reality, yasuke was kept around because he was an oddity, he wasn't a samurai, he was a poor warrior, to the point the real Mitsuhide let him live and sent him back to the portuguese because he wasn't a treat to him.
They have to frame it as SK being a dystopia is men's fault, else they'll have to admit feminism hasn't done anything good, not only for women, but for society at large
Yes, but that's something globalists don't want you to notice
For a bunch of man-hating "terfs" they do worry about antisemitism a lot
Oh, so they admit they think Stalin's Russia was real communism? 🤔
It's never enough for these people, SW could be Wakanda in Space and it'll never be enough
Art is stagnant, that's why you see things like banana on wall.
Wittgenstein did a number on them and Foucault solidified being a subversive retard as the evolution of art, artists (even pop artists) haven't recovered since, they think making trascendental art is useless and lowbrow
Again, secular religion. This is their satan
Artists think they are the shapers of culture, see also intelligentsia.
They thought they were untouchable until some years ago, they don't care if robots replace blue collar workers because they see them as uneducated.
Ackhyually those are based on Taishou era uniforms (except the yugioh one), before ww2
They are too retarded/coddled to recognize malice. All prog women think islamist are just ignorant/misguided and they'll change once they are educated. Worse yet, they think islamists act like that because of opression and once they're equal they'll behave
*everyone outside their gated communities
Ftfy
Op: 'Baning this is stupid, besides it's functionally the same as this tool'
You: 'you are as bad as the politicians wanting to confiscate property because of that comparison'
???
She was a Disney child actor
Breadtubers are literally funded by the CIA in order to "de-escale extremism", look it up.
If you think that's too far fetched google Encounter Magazine
I agree with the premise but disagree with the conclusion.
society changes
This is prefaced by three sophisms: Society progresses in a linear manner, America is spearheading said progress and society cannot change further
It's something marxists have been working a long time on, when Gramsci saw people were actually happy with capitalism and it didn't fall off naturally as stageism described, he proposed commies should start pestering people in private spaces, turn private into public
The indifference is the deadweight of history. The indifference operates with great power on history. The indifference operates passively, but it operates. It is fate, that which cannot be counted on. It twists programs and ruins the best-conceived plans. It is the raw material that ruins intelligence. That what happens, the evil that weighs upon all, happens because the human mass abdicates to their will; allows laws to be promulgated that only the revolt could nullify, and leaves men that only a mutiny will be able to overthrow to achieve the power. The mass ignores because it is careless and then it seems like it is the product of fate that runs over everything and everyone: the one who consents as well as the one who dissents; the one who knew as well as the one who didn’t know; the active as well as the indifferent. Some whimper piously, others curse obscenely, but nobody, or very few ask themselves: If I had tried to impose my will, would this have happened?
Yeah, funny how they won't question how a senile old man got the most votes ever
Because it enables left-wing sociopathy, it's par for the course at this point