1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

To make the implication that men know men and are such a better judge of character is laughable. There are countless examples of men making the wrong assertions of another man's character.

Tell me, have you seriously never thought a man to be decent only to learn he wasn't? Are you going to say that you always know a good man from a bad one?

If you're honest, and say no, not always, then you can see here where the judgement can fail. You're human, you have faults. Women are human, they have faults. You take the time to notice the failures and try and make that be the end all be all, when you conveniently ignore the countless success stories of women finding good men early on.

So women devolve all the way down to 'ALL men act like this'

Hmm...saying "all x act like x" is devolving huh? I would agree with this. So why would you turn around and say "all women act like x"? Is that not also devolving?

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, you've already given 2% as a possibility, so no need for me to even make my own point.

But the implication that men will always prey on women is that men are inherently unsafe to be around because they will always be predators. It's a shitty view of men because it ignores the recognition of the majority of men who aren't predators.

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

Abortion.

"ripping a baby apart piece by piece" the dramaaaaaatics lol.

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think you're applying the right logic here.

The implication of the statement "men are always going to prey on them" is that men will always be predators, and that men aren't safe to be around.

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

You know when I wrote that comment I laughed to myself "this motherfucker is probably gonna say 'abortion'" and yanno I was right.

Hilarious.

Don't pretend that that qualifies as "violent crime"

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

You would agree that men are always going to prey on women?

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

How is this on women?

The other user (a man) said that "men will always prey on [women]" which is a shitty take. Men aren't always going to act like that, and to think so is pretty misandrist

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

So then why are you saying "men are always going to prey on them" if it's only 1 out of 10?

4
Modeler43 4 points ago +4 / -0

Take a day off and learn to just laugh at a movie man

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

Liam Neeson is on a similar trajectory. Normally known for serious stuff but he's hilarious.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/I1Egp4ty26s

3
Modeler43 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm looking forward to it. A bunch of friends have been saying some good shit about it. It seems like a classic slapstick

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, I figured because you think about faggots a lot. You've made that very clear, my guy. "I go on about my day" as if you don't impulsively respond to every comment I make

Do you know what an analogy is? It's when you think of something that's similar to the real thing. In this case, playing tee ball against kids is just as easy as getting you to look like an idiot. That doesn't mean the analogy is actually happening.

You're so creative with your use of cum. Must have a lot of experience ;)

Anyway, I'll let you write out whatever fantasy you have for your last word. I know you're desperate for that.

Love you baby! See you around when you seek me out next time!

xoxo

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, it's just so easy using your own words against you. It's fun, like playing tee-ball but all the outfielders are toddlers.

Aw, you're praying for me too. That's so sweet <3

I must really live rent free in your head

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

The hur dur every name I'm called is projection is a female defense.

Don't project your bathhouse fantasies onto me faggot

Damn man you really are good at self-owning lol. You must be a woman.

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you wanna scroll back, the thread was talking about "kicking down doors and waving around a fake gun." You wanted to come in crying your little tears about how one article said "bang," which mostly means nothing in regards to the original point at hand.

Yes, you did find an article that says "bang." It was very cute. But in terms of the overall discussion, it's kind of a pithy win tbh. It's not like it at all justifies a kid getting shot.

But hey, if you wanna ride hippie cock you're welcome to, but no need to project your fantasies onto me as you continuously do.

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

All I'm doing is proper research into what people are saying. Others on this thread are saying that he had a fake gun and a mask and I'm just refuting that (correctly)

You were the one coming in teary-eyed about "but but but one article said he banged on the door" as if that means anything.

You didn't prove me wrong at all. I said that there's nothing attributing the kid to fake guns and masks, and you cried your little tears about how one article used the word "bang." That's not proving me wrong, loverboy. No need to project your ass-taking onto me ;)

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, now I'm projecting???? Wow, hilarious. You can't go a single moment without mentioning semen and I'm the one who's projecting. That's rich, bud lol

You called me retarded for...rightly calling out someone else's false claims? And then you come in all teary eyed "nuh uh some of the articles said he banged on the door it's so mean :(((((("

Christ you're sensitive.

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, congrats! You found an article that says "bang"! None of the other aggressive stuff though huh? Crazy how that worked out. We've really moved the goalposts away from "brandished a fake gun, was masked, and tried to kick down the door," which is how the thread began.

I guess rules are rules though. Which gay bathhouse should I send your money to?

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmmm, let's check again!

This one does mention the tik tok trend at the end, but the main story where the 11 year old was shot says it was just a doorbell ringing

This one also says the act was "similar," but still, say it was just a doorbell ringing

This one says the victim "knocked," but nothing about kicking down the door

This one also mentions knocking, no kicking, no banging

None say the word "banged," none talk about ski masks, none talk about fake gun, none mention anything aggressive.

If you're so sure that there are articles saying that this boy did any of that, I'm sure you'll be able to find them!

$1000 says though that you won't post any links (because there aren't any) and will just go on about your gay fantasies again.

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay, so it's just your feeeelz that this boy is kicking down doors and waving around a fake gun.

Other shitheads did it, and even though countless other kids have done simple ding dong ditch pranks, this kid must have been staging a "prank" break in because...reasons!

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

My entire premise is that the story of this boy wearing a ski mask, brandishing a fake gun, and kicking down the door of the shooter is discussed solely and entirely in this forum.

I'm not going to just believe that without any evidence.

Actions of people in other parts of the world don't have any bearing on the actions in this specific story.

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

After I saw the tweet, I looked up the story to get more information. I found multiple sources discussing it, and every single one said that the kid rang the doorbell and ran away. None even seem to mention this ski mask tiktok trend that others are assuming happened.

Of course that isn't evidence, per se, but as far as the recount of events goes that is the current story.

The only people talking about the ski mask thing seem to be users on this forum, so that's what I'm looking to verify.

Both things can exist, where there is a viral dangerous "prank" happening in some places, and in this particular story it's a ding dong ditch.

It's a simple question: how are users here concluding that this kid did the viral trend when every story talks about it as ding dong ditch (which, arguably, is another viral trend, albeit much older)?

Your redirect seems to indicate that you're just assuming

1
Modeler43 1 point ago +1 / -0

How is it that you know that this is what happened here? Just guessing? Or is there any actual evidence of it?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›