2
Hugs 2 points ago +2 / -0

I highly doubt a figure like that is legitimate in any sense of the word.

2
Hugs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Megan Rapinoe's comments about Dave Chappelle's jokes directly lead to violence.

8
Hugs 8 points ago +8 / -0

Using factors external to the film in order to review said film is okay when the left do it. When we do it, it's illegitimate "review bombing."

3
Hugs 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm so sorry I didn't archive someone else's post. I'll try not to be so faggoty and retarded in the future, massa.

2
Hugs 2 points ago +3 / -1

No dungeon crawlers have ever been able to live up to Diablo 2, in my opinion. That was the peak. I've tried virtually every dungeon crawler since and the best ones still have glaring issues (e.g., the best loot has random affixes you have to grind for eternity to get because it's all soulbound, or endgame is just running infinitely scaling "difficulties" in random layouts ZZZZZZ).

Grim Dawn is very good, but it's missing some soul somehow. I don't think the worldbuilding is all that special.

10
Hugs 10 points ago +10 / -0

My unsolicited advice is to not get caught up in comparing yourself to others, and to give up on the idea that others will lead lives that are acceptable to you. That letting go of "ideological control" is quite liberating. I think you should also meter your input of aggravating news and focus on things that satisfy you and give you some sense of fulfilment. Things you can control. There will always be a fight, but that doesn't mean you can't withdraw, focus on yourself and all the good things, regroup, then make your way back.

35
Hugs 35 points ago +36 / -1

You and I might bite our tongues and go along with what was legal even if it ran counter to our ethics or other values, but these women are not there to be judges, they're there to be activists.

6
Hugs 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah man, "holistic admissions" that take, e.g., zip code into consideration. There will be cases where this sidestepping takes place and constructive discrimination will be argued, but that'll be difficult to prove.

7
Hugs 7 points ago +8 / -1

They can always discriminate by race through some proxy. "Holistic admissions" etc.

14
Hugs 14 points ago +14 / -0

Can't wait to dig into this. I'll read the whole disposition this weekend. Is it as sweeping and general as the Bee has presented here?

1
Hugs 1 point ago +1 / -0

But don't developers like this scenario? They build fewer houses but the houses are worth so much more than they ought to be. That seems perfect for making money.

by folx
13
Hugs 13 points ago +13 / -0

Holy strawmammoth, Batman. Who is this creature arguing with, exactly?

12
Hugs 12 points ago +12 / -0

Ah yes, the "Islam is right about women" paradox that leftists refuse to acknowledge. I guess we learned that when confronted by it they just lock threads and say they don't want users "immigrating" to their sub as though it's some witty counter-hypocrisy. Ironically, making that joke and actually banning users undermines them completely and reinforces their actual hypocrisy.

8
Hugs 8 points ago +8 / -0

Total aside, but that article is full of grammar mistakes, missing words, and duplicate words. Yeesh. I couldn't focus on the content after noticing it a few times.

7
Hugs 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yes, it is. Alito is the only dissent. NG, ACB, CT side against Texas but for different reasons than the winning disposition.

4
Hugs 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is pretty grotesque. If true, Hunter sounds like a sociopathic narcissist who thinks he's the main character in a gangster movie. He really needs to be taken down several dozen pegs.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›