2
Hellsbells00 2 points ago +2 / -0

Leftist groups are composed of multiple classes of failure, the sociopaths are a small enough group that they usually end up only in management. The shock troops of leftist movements are basically religious zealots, that worship the state or communist ideology instead of god. Leftiist ideologies more closely resemble religions than economic or functional political theories.

Communism in particular is a structure uniquely suited to allowing sociopaths to manipulate large groups of useful idiots. Stalin was almost certainly one. Lenin and hitler were probably more deranged than sociopathic - the high functioning sociopaths usually succeed leadership rather than creating a movement.

0
Hellsbells00 0 points ago +1 / -1

It was also an attack on an individual, not a group. And despite what that conpro faggot thinks, vampires are not a jew stereotype.

1
Hellsbells00 1 point ago +2 / -1

They don't actually need to eat humans to live, as established by the one that turned an entire city to gold and lived in it for decades.

And nearly everything you just described can also fit the description of "human" sociopathic predators.

10
Hellsbells00 10 points ago +10 / -0

Did you watch the whole show or read the manga? Societal infiltration including of government is something the smarter demons did multiple times. This echoes the population of sociopaths. The majority of them are just dangerous animals. The smarter ones are much more insidious.

11
Hellsbells00 11 points ago +11 / -0

They're emotionless manipulators that look like people, but aren't, that will say anything or play any role for personal gain.

Am I describing sociopaths or the demons?

33
Hellsbells00 33 points ago +34 / -1

The demons in Frieren are a perfect match to the sociopathic predator. They ARE an allegory, for the evil masquerading as human in our midst, and the kind of people that make up the ranking members of the globalist cabal. And these barking seals can't see it because they've been trained to see criminal behavior and immediately defend it.

They aren't media literate, they're reality illiterate.

2
Hellsbells00 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the coof payoffs proved a doctor's license has little to no moral weight, and if the highest court in the land ignoring the 2020 election fraud suits didn't shake your faith in the mockery our legal system has become, then nearly everything else in the last decade should have.

No license nor institution is uncorruptible. Hacks, grifters and self absorbed sociopathics are only a payday away from a knife in your back at all times.

17
Hellsbells00 17 points ago +17 / -0

That creature looks like a vampire - the actual kind, not the sparkling faggot kind.

-10
Hellsbells00 -10 points ago +4 / -14

You losing your actblue job when the FBI gets fucked will make me cheer goblin.

-12
Hellsbells00 -12 points ago +4 / -16

You fed goblins have your containment board. No amount of brigading changes the fact that this board's purpose is directly at odds with your leftist faggotry.

Go back in your hole, goblin.

-11
Hellsbells00 -11 points ago +4 / -15

Don't use Christ's name as a euphemism for an insult, you mongoloid.

Actually go ahead, you just reveal yourself as a fake when you do. Only a goblin would try to twist that phrase into something negative like you do. You're no believer. You're a deranged faggot.

-5
Hellsbells00 -5 points ago +2 / -7

reeee joooooo you don't like gay race communism you're a JOOOOOO

Proving me right, leftist. Die mad about it, goblin. You act more like your faggoted german vegan socialist's stereotype of a jew than any actual right wing person would.

4
Hellsbells00 4 points ago +9 / -5

Wehraboo crypto leftist fags admitting to being NEETs is no surprise. But the vast majority of useless layabouts that aren't trying to find jobs are not right wing. Being unemployed because of a bad economy and being unemployed because you're a parasite are different.

-7
Hellsbells00 -7 points ago +2 / -9

At some point you have to realize none of these "reee jooooos" fags are intellectually honest. The entirety of their "movement" is propagated from a psyop. Racial idpol collectivism is leftist. Pushing that as right wing is an attempt to manipulate.

There are three goals of this psyop - first, convince normies / leftists of their horseshoe theory propaganda. They point to these insidious fag actors and say "see, the right is nazis". This is to defame right wing groups and muddle discourse with bad information, to cover up the fact that all authoritarian leftist governments have been evil and all of the greatest atrocities have been committed by them.

The second is to disrupt right wing activity. Sowing their moronic goblinoid bullshit distracts and disrupts right wing organizing and action.

The third is to convince retards that would be right wing to fall in with them. By converting morons into leftist collectivist ideology, they hedge their bets. Even if their standard leftist movement fails, if they can corrupt their opposition into building an authoritarian government they will have accomplished their goal of centralizing power. Then they just have to subvert it, which is their specialty.

This creature you are trying to engage with is not a human trying to engage in good faith discussion. You cannot convince it. It is either a puppet, or something so retarded it falls for the convenient trap. It is natural to want the enemy to be easily identifiable by something as obvious as an ethnicity. It is also very obviously contradicted by reality. Human beings that are capable of basic observation don't fall for that.

2
Hellsbells00 2 points ago +2 / -0

The bioware of "old" was retarded, too. Dragon age was after mass effect, which was mediocre and followed up by garbage. The old star wars games were the last actually good thing they made, and even those are debatable.

4
Hellsbells00 4 points ago +5 / -1

They're a weapons testing ground for our corrupt military industrial complex. Much like Ukraine, a lot of the money stolen from us makes it's way back to politicians' pockets.

8
Hellsbells00 8 points ago +8 / -0

So if we downsize the federal government's staff by 90% and stop all the onesided censorship and institutional protection for leftists, can we get them all to leave the country too?

8
Hellsbells00 8 points ago +8 / -0

What does it cost in real money? Maple leaves and gravy are not substitutes for a real economy.

0
Hellsbells00 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes, the treaty of versailles that was quite bad. You're blaming that on the US bailing the allies out. You'd prefer the war completely decimated europe?

-1
Hellsbells00 -1 points ago +1 / -2

The wehraboo fags aren't "alt right". That's CNN terminology. Any kind of slander is thrown under that definition, it's like "assault weapon".

They're leftists. Anyone who advocates gay race communism is a leftist. Anyone who tries to screech "ree it's all joos" is attempting to distract from the real nature of globalists and derail actual right wing with idpol shit - you aren't wrong about that part. They may claim to fight the dominant leftist party, but they're still leftists. Don't let them pretend otherwise.

3
Hellsbells00 3 points ago +3 / -0

Guns are outright superior to not having them. Guns are the great equalizer. They protect the weak. The absolute hypocrisy of the weak faggots that hate guns is that without them they would have to live in fear of raw force.

1
Hellsbells00 1 point ago +3 / -2

You're blaming the US for Europe's mistakes now? Your dipshit leaders signed the league of nations, Wilson's retarded plan - the US refused it. Europe dragged the US into war both times.

Wilson wasn't even popular here. He only got the presidency because of infighting from the republicans and Roosevelt splitting their vote. That disaster really solidified the two party system here and gave us the fucking federal income tax which was supposed to be temporary.

1
Hellsbells00 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not only fear that pushes people towards good through religion. But some people are animals that need that fear. It is also the promise of reward for being good, and the social pressure of a shared moral framework. It is not a mark against the existence of god that religion is necessary. You're conflating theism and organized religion again.

The group that needs religion to function in society the most would not be religious without cultural pressure. The same people today become self-obsessed hedonists. Look at the leftist goons that exemplify your point of "rioting wildly out of control". They have adopted the progressive dogma as a replacement for an actually valuable religion.

You should know by this point that the human experience isn't universal, and there are plenty of people out there operating on lower levels of consciousness, that wouldn't even be recognizable to you. Like the people that lack an internal monologue - that literally move through life operating on instinct, not thought.

Good people don't need God to make them have a conscience - but good religion helps develop morals at a fundamental level before the level of logical thought, where someone can rationalize that altruistic behavior is better than acting purely for self-interest. And many people never reach that level.

To rise above the need for religion as a society is impossible. The human condition prevents it, even if you had a eugenics program and an education program of extremely high quality and uniformity, bad people would still exist. And those things would require a powerful and uncorrupt (impossible) state. The nature of power attracts evil to it, so in attempting to kill religion you produce the results you already see - a society of rot, with a bunch of malformed replacements for God in the state and the television.

Back to the point of calling religion theism - it is not. You are making a mistake to reject the possibility of a higher power just because organized religion is an unfortunate requirement of society. Like all institutions of men it is imperfect and corruptible - but you are right in identifying protestantism as a more palatable one because of it's decentralized nature. But the structures of religion and the existence of God are not the same topic at all.

1
Hellsbells00 1 point ago +1 / -0

And I would say most, because the psychology of leftist dogma parallels religions. Their "trust the science" and their political ideologies all emulate religious fervor. They replace faith in god with faith in the state or some other false god.

The structure provided by religion is part of what societies need, but they also need the enforcement of religion. They need to believe in a power beyond what is human to keep them in line even when they aren't being watched - to make them believe that being good is GOOD, not just necessary.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›