Fairly certain it originated before gaming entirely, given it's prevalence in the jogger population and common use as cover for criminal behavior. At least it definitely predates the era where games getting frequent post release patches became common. You may be confused on it's origins.
The phrase is used for denying any accountability for personal actions.
Unrestricted democracy does not work, period. Allowing people without the moral capacity or incentive to care about the higher functions of society to vote results in an easily manipulable system.
Unfortunately this site is an offshoot of reddit, so basic technical competence and logical thought are rarer here than you probably expect.
Reddit was always full of web2.0 goons that don't belong.
He's talking about microsd storage for mobile devices, not solid state drive storage (which is wasteful for media drives).
The amount of memory stacked on those tiny things is incredible to an oldfag - you can get half tb storage in a slice of plastic the size of a pinky nail.
Purist democracy will always fail. The US was founded with limited voting rights in mind - universal suffrage was the death knell. In the modern corrupted system, simply reverting to land ownership would be insufficient, but for the time period it was much better.
In modern day I'd suggest a starship troopers style system of franchise only being earned through potentially deadly personal civic service.
I have always hated that phrase used nigh exclusively by self-absorbed faggots, that are knowingly doing evil things.
I can hate both.
I get plenty of value from reviews. First thing I do is check negative reviews to see if many of them are talking about similar problems. Positive reviews are a very mixed bag, but the negative side is usually decent for highlighting major issues and much faster than forum crawling. Positive reviews are mostly just simping, but if someone I know has good taste posts one or it's getting a lot of comparisons to other games I like I'll give it a second look if I was on the fence.
It's a tool, that used along with others informs the consumer. It's not ideal as a sole metric, but it's useful to look at aggregate opinions.
They aren't right wing. They're crypto leftists. They support centralized government and worship a socialist goblin - the prime difference between the wehraboo fags trying to subvert the right, and stalinist tankie faggots, is their false idol, not their ideology.
The brits are jews now?
And you are a rabid socialist mongrel. Quit pretending you aren't on the left, collectivist faggot.
Your existence is built around parasitizing any self-worth you have from the accomplishments of whites. As if slavs, germanics, francs, spaniards and such can all be pigeonholed into a single ethnic group for you to claim relation to - because you have no actual value to contribute, only the accomplishments of others' ancestors to steal. You even rage against christianity, like a good little lefty faggot.
Boy that sounds familiar doesn't it? Sounds like a certain group of so called KANGZ, no? You wuz vikangz?
Faggot.
Feedback for the developer isn't the primary purpose of the review system, though. That's what the forums are for. The review system is for informing consumers.
If your opinion is mixed and you feel so strongly about that, that you can't justify a positive or negative review, then your opinion does not serve the purpose of a review system to begin with, which is to inform purchase decisions.
And if a game is "meh" or can't justify a positive value judgement, then that should justify a negative. Because the game costs the consumer money, it should at least be a positive.
The neutral opinion is no review - if someone absolutely must tell the world that they don't have an actual opinion either way, that's just narcissism.
That people are cucks wanting to be a milquetoast faggot afraid to give offense even when trying to give advice on whether or not someone should purchase a product?
Mixed or neutral is negative. If a game isn't good enough to earn a positive review it's bad. If you're so neutral on it you can't make up your mind, then A: it's bad, because it's a waste of time to play something "neutral" or B: you don't need to review at all.
You're linking nationalism with socialism, implying that the two are connected "everyone should be national socialist to some degree" and that the nazis weren't just using it as cover. Nationalism is independent of socialism.
All strong nations have elements of nationalism. The original united states did. The current united states does. The soviets also did. The chinese do now.
Your post is trying to link nationalist sentiments to leftist ideologies as if leftist ideologies don't just use them to further their real cause of gaining power. Simping for socialism, essentially - playing cover for the fact that those faggots did nothing unique. My initial reply was telling you to stop playing propagandist for the wehraboos.
They are faggots, the conpro tourist brigade that doesn't belong here and has been steadily trying to slide the board are also faggots, their ideology is leftist garbage and this is a right wing forum on a right wing site.
I think you also do not understand what nationalism is. The nazi racial policies are not inherent to nationalism. Racial collectivism is not inherent to nationalism, either.
All leftists are bad. Socialism here does not excuse the socialism in Germany - which is what they should have discarded after ww2, but instead they discarded nationalism. FDR was a socialist, and a colossal faggot that set in motion the death of the US.
"The west attacked him". He invaded Poland. The first act of aggression was him. And he conspired with the commies to divvy up eastern europe because like all sociopath leftist dictators he was a power mad faggot.
I am not open to crypto-leftists trying to slide right wing websites by simping for an authoritarian leftist regime, claiming it is opposing communism. Nazis vs commies is just leftist infighting. Nazis are not right wing.
What part of "planned central government control of economy, purges and war" doesn't sound like communism to you? The part where they pretended to be looking out for their people (communists also pretend that). Which was the propaganda, as demonstrated by the results.
As well, Hitler instigated WW2 alongside the Soviets. Had he actually been benevolent and concerned for his people's welfare he wouldn't have worked with the communists or started invading other nations. He and Zelensky are guilty of similar crimes when it comes to fucking your own people for personal gain.
Are you that ignorant? In actual function, the nazis were just another authoritarian leftist dictatorship that left nothing but ruin in it's wake.
Harry potter is accidentally the most pro 2A thing to ever come from the brits.
Wands are guns and everyone in their society is constantly armed. The government is corrupt at best and is actively subverted by evil people, by the end it literally requires armed rebellion to overthrow the tyrannical authoritarian government.
The wehraboos pretend to be right wing as a psyop. Many of the dumber ones do not understand what actually defines political ideologies at all, but the ones pushing it from behind the curtain have always been the globalists.
It is useful on many levels for them to associate nazis with the right. It is a propaganda tool for them to claim that both sides of politics end in authoritarian hellscapes - horseshoe theory, when that is actually just the result of leftism. It is also a tool to subvert right wing movements, and turn them into supporters of left wing ideology - it's their backup plan, hedging their bets.
The globalists do not care what they have to pretend to believe to seize power. Any ideology that pushes strong centralized power is good for them, because their bread and butter is climbing bureaucracy and corrupting organizations - sociopaths do excellently at that.
They weren't "race first, with minor socialism". That's the propaganda they fed to the useful idiots. They were a sociopathic leftist cabal leading a horde of useful idiots into an authoritarian death cult that ended in the total destruction of their nation.
In window dressing they claimed difference from communists. In function they were the same.
You're confusing propaganda for ideology. The few elements of it that you have identified positively are neither inherent to, or exclusive to, national socialism.
Nationalism or at least some nationalistic elements are part of any strong society. Nationalism is also not tied to either side of the political scale - actual american nationalists, not the wehraboo larping faggots, are right wing, while national socialists are leftists.
Username checks out
I don't think even that matches the sheer level of nastiness of EVE. That game's biggest stories are all out of game activity, actual social engineering, doxxing and fraud type shit. And it's all driven in a game that codified pay to win shit - you could trade subscription fees as currency, IIRC. So they just cut out the gold selling middleman and did it themselves.
Damages from fuckery in EVE have actually been measured in dollars because that mechanic allows a direct conversion.
The rot has always existed, GG was a great red pill delivery system though by showing a micro-scale version of what the big leagues do. The pulitzer prize for example has always been a joke, the guy that covered up the Holodomor got one.
The image of honor and integrity these faggots ginned up for themselves over a century getting stripped from them in 2014, and then hammered again in 16 by Trump, has been highly entertaining for people that know how much of a bunch of faggots they really are.
Killed it? That kept going off reddit for a long time, I didn't even recall they tried that until you mentioned it. Reddit was never the primary discussion zone for any of the real autists coming up with ideas and actually doing shit.
You can notice the majority of them have the local fed board in their post history. What they do, what they tried to do to c/gaming as well, is a standard forum manipulation tactic. They are trying to manufacture outrage, from which to demand the admins put someone else in charge either directly from their suggestions or from a "vote" that will be astroturfed as fuck.
The entire wehrabooo pretend neonazi movement is a fed psyop.