-1
Gizortnik -1 points ago +1 / -2

That's stupid. The Aryans literally don't exist anymore. You are, at best, a partial descendent of an Aryan, but so are the Indians and Persians.

-1
Gizortnik -1 points ago +1 / -2

"racial consciousness" is not the sole possession of the National Socialists.

Sorry, Jews are a religion, and Whites are a race. White Jews, Black Muslims, same difference.

7
Gizortnik 7 points ago +7 / -0

"I do find your language offensive, but I'd still be happy to help you with your crime."

I'd say "kill yourself you fugly cunt", because that officer is going to all but throw away and police report that gets filed, but we both know that this officer is ALSO looking for a reason to arrest the victim for something equivalent to a "Disorder Conduct" charge.

7
Gizortnik 7 points ago +7 / -0

Because the Fabian Socialists originate form Britain and have been desperately trying to push a full blown Socialist revolution in the country since the 19th century.

They keep getting within a hair's width of it too.

We must liberate the English from the London School of Economics.

10
Gizortnik 10 points ago +10 / -0

Well, you like fucking your team for your own personal advancement, while sucking a whole lot of dick, and doing it so you can use your power to push your work onto your subordinates, you're basically a Democrat already!

10
Gizortnik 10 points ago +10 / -0

"Former Marine" forgets that shooting steel with a rifle from 5 fucking yards is dangerous and stupid.

Someone shit me a fucking RSO to beat his ass.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

a person that is born and raised in the US but ethnically Japanese, or Indian, or Afghanistan may not fit well into the nation of their ethnic ancestors...

That depends. They may be ethnically American. American is both a Nation, by virtue of civic assimilation, but may also be (or becoming) an ethnos. If they are ethnically Japanese, they will have to join America civic-ly, and integrate into the US. Over a few generations, their decedents may become ethnically American.

I also reject the idea that "white" should contain "Jewish."

I'm not saying White contains Jewish by definition. That's the point of European Jews. They are White Jews. There are also White Muslims. Judaism is a religion that contains multiple ethnic groups. Some Jews are European, but some are also Middle-Eastern and African. It's not that White is a full container for all Jews. It's that there are Jews that are White.

sure maybe you can make a coherent category that does that, but you're still not addressing the actual point being made when most of the posters here use "white."

Unfortunately, many of the idiot users here are asserting a "White" that simply doesn't exist at all. A biologically homogenous European racial solidarity movement. There is no such thing as that. There is no racial solidarity between Albanians, Portuguese, Celts, Swiss, Boer, and Finns. The American definition of White is simply a container of "European", where as the British concept of "White" is basically just British, or Anglo-Saxon. What stupid people here like to do is desperately smash them all together where all "Europeanoids" are just culturally Saxon-Anglos that can only be saved by Socialism, if it just wasn't for those pesky jews.

My issue is that the Socialists here don't have points at all, and aren't engaging in an honest discussion about ethnicity in the first place when they aren't willing to accept distinctions between race, religion, ethnos, culture, and genetics. It's a completely upside-down idea that it starts with genetics, and then genetics informs race, and then race informs culture, religion, ethos, kin, clan, tribe, individual people, and nations equally, at the same time, to the same degree.

It is an intentional reduction of nuance to fit it into a historical dialectic. I can't accept the point, because the point is based on a false premise.

4
Gizortnik 4 points ago +4 / -0

"I just think it’s racist. In this city, it is outrageously racist. You can print that. It’s racist and disrespectful," Cora Masters Barry, Barry’s wife, told DC News Now. She said she wasn't contacted by the pizza chain about the dessert.

Barry's wife wanted a payout for using his name, and now she's harassing the business until she gets it.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you engage with me in good faith, you'll find my responses much different than, "shut up stormfag". That's my response because no National Socialist has ever yet interacted with me in good faith. Even the smart ones like Arch. It's actually infuriating.

So, here's my good faith response. Neither white nor jew is an ethnic identity. This is the problem of intentionally stuffing them into the wrong category.

Race is not an ethnicity, nor a religion. A race contains multiple ethnicities, and it may contain at least one religion. A religion is neither a race nor an ethnicity. A religion may contain one race, or it may contain multiple races given it's size. However, a religious sect typically only contains one race. Any religion of significance is typically multi-ethnic. An ethnicity may contain typically contains only religion. Races contain ethnicities, and not the other way around.

The hierarchy of familial categories that make nations from narrowest to broadest go as follows:

  • Kin
  • Clan
  • Tribe
  • Ethnos
  • Nation
  • Religion
  • Race

As such, jew is not an ethnos. It is a religious sect. Ashkenazi Jew is an ethnic group. Judaism is a multi-ethnic religion. White is race. It is a multi-ethnic race. White is sufficiently broad that it actually contains multiple religions, one of which is Judaism. This is why it "white jews" are not contradictory terms, it's race, then religion, with no ethnic group specified.

they do see themselves as a separate ethnic group

They sometimes see themselves as separate. Many jews integrated into the US to such a degree that it is used against them in Israel for being secular. German jews identified themselves as "Germans of a mosaic faith". If you are operating in bad faith, you assert an unfalsifiable position that every jew that integrates is a subversive, and every jew that doesn't is a separatist.

In many cases, particularly among Americans, they are simply wrong and are trying to avoid the category of being "white", while trying to benefit from being "jew", while pretending they are not white, and pretending they are jew, while not practicing Judaism.

At that point, they can be safely dismissed as a Rachel Dolezal level Leftist.

23
Gizortnik 23 points ago +24 / -1

A meme that no one knows about being amplified in hopes that the claim it was created by Russia can poison the well for more stories coming later.

5
Gizortnik 5 points ago +6 / -1

In fairness, some of them were openly treasonous, but at least they were openly treasonous for good reasons: "the war is lost and I don't want my kids raped by communists"; whereas our generals are openly treasonous because "I'm winning the war against you and I want your kids raped by communists"

-2
Gizortnik -2 points ago +1 / -3

No, you're good with them when they come over here and rape your sister. It's why you repeat whatever propaganda you get spoon fed to you by Qatar, and make their arguments more sympathetic.

Additionally, your efforts help to defeat populist sentiment, that way you're doubly effective at supporting both jihadis and the establishment.

-4
Gizortnik -4 points ago +1 / -5

Whites who are racially conscious don't consider Jews to be White, ergo why would we consider him a race traitor?

Because you know you are wrong, which is why you're constantly trying to look out for "jewish subversion", and why you accuse everyone you don't like of being a jew, like Tommy.

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

Again, the advertising oligopoly is a weapon of control.

Omni Group, WPP, and another "Advertising & Marketing holding corporation" are designed to control all ad-revenue on earth. This is why they do it.

-1
Gizortnik -1 points ago +2 / -3

Not exactly. The generals under-estimated the capability of the German Army early on, and Hitler was actually right to be as ambitious as he was. There was a ton of resistance from the German military about invading France. They didn't think they'd win the war, and they didn't understand how bad the military in France had gotten.

Both the military and the government pretended that they had preformed better against the French, Dutch, and Polish than they really did, and when they stormed into Russia, they over-estimated their capabilities.

The Generals were right at one very specific point: when the war was lost. The military had long since figured out that the war was unwinnable by 1944. Frankly, there were a lot of generals that thought the war might not have been winnable before the Normandy invasion. That's the thing that Hitler wouldn't accept.

5
Gizortnik 5 points ago +6 / -1

Hit and miss.

Some were excellent. Most of those were no longer in command or alive by the end of the war, and it was typically Hitler's fault. A lot of the "better" generals really just hyped themselves up to the press. Overall, most of them were simply competent.

3
Gizortnik 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are dealing with a Leftist infestation of art that began in 1903, when someone who hated the conventional art scene entered a urinal into a competition, and was surprised that he won.

During the progressive era, the concepts of "radicalism" and "counter-culture" became a middle-class intelligentsia luxury belief. Leftism has since squatted there until all it's become is that.

You are looking at the real-life BreadTube. This is nothing but manufactured appeal, political propaganda, and criminal embezzlement all rolled into one; long after actual culture has been displaced.

I don't think Art Museums should be banned, but I think everyone who works in them should be forcibly removed, most of the artwork with it, and the whole industry restructured.

17
Gizortnik 17 points ago +17 / -0

Good Try

That's how he responds to his own rhetoric being pushed back to him.

He knows his actions are bullshit.

1
Gizortnik 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can't just ignore the power of a religion over an ethnic bias, when you have something like Islam or Leftism which are totalitarian.

Put it like this, I don't care what Arabs are genetically predisposed towards in a vacuum. Islam promotes violence and close cousin marriage. The two fastest ways to decrease a population's IQ is to expose children to violence and marry cousins.

Is that an innate trait of Arabs stretching through all time? Or is it a totalitarian religion that literally breeds pathological behavior into populations. What was genetic, is now cultivated by environment into a new force that is influencing female sex selection.

Again, this is why East German IQ's are important. They aren't different cultures prior to Leftism. Not different languages or religions. Only politics. But that politics cultivates violence, corruptions, starvation, incest, and every other kind of pathology and degeneracy that could ruin a population and promote pathological behavior. The Leftism was only present for 3 generations, and it yet it still had a violent and immediate effect on the population's statistics.

If you work backwards from a Leftist environment and declare that the outcomes are normal for that population, then you've misunderstood what you are looking at. You are failing to recognize a population afflicted by a mental disease that attacks them at every possible level: intellectual, emotional, physical, linguistic, cultural, even genetic.

6
Gizortnik 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't necessarily agree that betting markets are better for predictions than polls because of reasons like this.

For example, Ronda Rousey v. Holly Holm had 4000:1 odds for Holly in Vegas because the media over-hyped Rousey.

What we've been seeing in the betting markets is the populism of free market, but also monied interests (both among Dems & Reps) to sway said market one direction or another.

Markets help push through bullshit and push polls, but a good poll is better than a betting odds.

-9
Gizortnik -9 points ago +2 / -11

Jesus, you Leftists really don't even have different arguments.

Do you write for the BBC when you're not here?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›