This review was weird when I watched it last; he's great in the first half then starts saying opposite stuff in the second half that doesn't make any sense.

It was here, but "GlobalFilter" removed it. Hmm.

Embrace. Extend. Extinguish.

Sounds like "yes, the right is upset the left took over their extremist exaggerations".

Honestly, I like her more after reading through this, I'm use to sexual-bullshitting from the left, maybe the right is upset they stole "their" thing now?

She’s suggested public policy is driven by a “climate of fear, hatred & revenge” against sex offenders

Yes. It definitely has been.

I'm not going to run through this all but I'll remind you that "child pornography" has been defined in the US as anyone under 18.

This has led to utterly absurd cases they've brought charges of "production and distribution of child pornography" against 2 teenagers, dating each other, who took pics of themselves and sent them to the other teenager.

Oh yawn.

What's this about, is the right upset that the left took over their "all sex is bad" stance so now they're having a fit?

Wonder if this is why they're suddenly handwaving and distracting about going after "incels".

Feminists have been trying to blame incels since 2014. Every time there's any shooting shooting they work their ass off to try to tie it to incels.

Over the last 8 years they've found...what, 2 in the US, and 4 if you count canada and europe? Even those numbers are a bit suspicious as we have no idea what wide criteria they use.

A single summer weekend in chicago kills more people than incels have in 8 years.

It's clear there's an agenda behind it. Persecuting men for not matching women's sexual preferences?

Or is it like Puritinism where they persecute women who sleep around to much, and also women who aren't getting married when they should? I don't know but clearly it's not based on there being any actual numbers.

There's been 2 female mass shooters in the us (one girl and one trans (fake) man), and 2 male incel mass shooters. Literally the same numbers.

Men who can't get laid and have nothing to do are so dangerous guys!

So what's your plan?
Well...first we're going to make it either illegal or fireable / expulsion if men flirt with women.
Then, we're going to kick men out of jobs and replace them with women so they don't have a job to go to.
Then, we're going to constantly insult them as subhuman losers all the time.

Uh...that sounds a lot like they're trying to make this situation happen, either that or you don't actually actually believe they're dangerous. .

I saw that some male mayor of one of those ukranian cities was kidnapped and killed, and replaced with a woman. Thought of TheImpossible.

He just talks about women in the same way feminists talk about men. I find it refreshing.

US was 90% white in 1960.
US is 60% white and falling.

Globally ditching an entire class of aircraft, overnight, because of one crash, that more than half of the people on board survived? God, just that sentence alone gets the noggin joggin', and yet I never drew the oil oligarch connection.

I don't think that's actually accurate. I watched something about the US developing airships to use as a sort of aircraft carrier in the sky, they put several into service, basically bad weather would always crash them.

edit: ran across the video on it -
https://youtu.be/VNOusZLO7y4

They had power and they handed it to the woke lefties.

Agree completely.

JK Rowling and the "intellectual dark web" are not a voting bloc - there are about as many of them among the gen. pop. as there are nevertrump neocons.

I think there's a ton more of them than this, but they lack power over their party. I've voted liberal my whole life and I'm not going to do it next time. I will vote for people like desantis in a heartbeat over these fucked up assholes the dems put in power now.

That is to say, generously, that they represent about a fraction of a percent of the Democrat coalition.

I do not agree, but the problem as you put it is they have barely any power in their party. Maybe "none" would be more accurate.

They know their "nazi" obsession in the US is just lazy scriptwriting making a group that hasn't existed for 80's into the lazy villain.

So when someone else does it their first though is they must be doing the same thing.

Anti-woke leftists are basically a forced internet meme - they don't really exist in real life, and, even when they do, it's just a very thin veneer.

Disagree completely, but the problem is they have absolutely no power.

Always the same thing, he starts talking about women, in the same way feminists talk about men. Someone has a fit.

I think you're right in your perspective, but it could go the other way. I've read before that a 1 party government is the worst, and a 2 party government is the second worst, one might extrapolate that similarly a single global order is the worst.

China straight up says "yeah we're going to do this in-country, us stuff is banned".
Russia doesn't seem to be able to do that quite as directly, but perhaps this will lead it to the same end, seems like it would make a lot more sense for a russian payment processor to be developed in russia than to just send all the money made over to the US.

They keep talking about russia's biggest income stream being oil and gas. If the west goes to electric cars and oil demand drops does that seriously hurt russia? Seems like a declining nation with nuclear weapons is a dangerous idea. Better that they develop their own versions of western systems that keeps the money in russia.

As an individual I would like to isolate away from this political bullshit but I can't. An entire nation, especially one the size of russia, can, and would possibly benefit from it.

This is awful, but you hotta wonder if it's 1 step further. Maybe they're reporting them stolen to commit insurance fraud.

I mean, that stopped working, so now they seem to be trying to reverse course and go back the other way. Problem it doesn't work real well because people bought into what they were selling last year.

For Trudeau there's only people who agree with him, or they're nazis. Russia is doing the same thing.

Works for me.

The point is to give (mostly white) women something to fetishize.

...that the media gets excited about.

I've reached the same point for sure.
I just start to wonder if anything the media reports is true.

Well...actually...this is what "they" were telling their facebook followers and promoters from the beginning. Periodically someone would show up in comment sections saying "no, they said it's more effective to phrase it like this".