I've read this theory that dems deliberately used research on what women get from men in order to campaign on reolacing men with the goverment and corporate, wondering if you haapen to have seen any sources on that.

When in men's ability to be physically mobile meant life or death they wore what were basically skirts. Greek Hopolites wore "skirts". Roman soldiers wore "skirts". The scottish kilt is a "skirt". Or the hunter-gatherer equivalent - the loincloth.

"Skirts" were a very mobile and functional piece of clothing, before they became unfashionable or correlated with a certain personality meaning.

Attention is the thing they really get out of it.

One decade they'll be protesting for no bras, the next they'll be demanding face covering that are paid for by the government, none of the logical parts are important to them at all.

Who on earth would want to wear trousers if they could wear skirts and look good? Trousers are horribly uncomfortable in comparison.

Same thing as today - you don't really grasp the danger you're in until it's to late.

Some suffragettes, including Sylvia Pankhurst, of the militant Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU), showed scant regard for the sensitivities of the occasion, asserting that – as “women and children first” was the “universal” rule – the men’s actions were not “chivalrous”, and insisting their sacrifices did nothing to offset the shoddy way women were treated in everyday life.

This is really the problem, if a man says he's going to do something, there's plenty of room for skepticism. Put "women" in there and they're suddenly shocked when women with power behave the same way the worst men with power do.

Well, I was told that if we put women in charge all our issues would go away? How could these issues exist.

I never thought I would live in a time where they socially popularized genital mutilation on a nationwide scale, but...here we are.

I think the claim was that there's another dinosaur that is that size but doesn't have a cool name. He mixed them up either by accident...or on purpose 'cause the name sounded cooler.

Gee, notice a pattern when you make a white women your next in line?

Rice’s top lieutenant, Dana Walden — who also made the move from Fox to Disney — will be taking over his responsibilities.

Hmm, am I the only person who read the link?

They say -

Part of me believes I was lied to about a lot of things about transitioning but I still believe I would rather have been born a cis man/be a cis man. However I have come to the conclusion that no matter how much i transition I will never be CIS. so although femme things used to bother me I sit here wondering if maybe I would have been better off staying as female

Hmm.

I would note that once again they're lying.

They use a bunch of emotional words, the same ones they lied about covid with - "surging" "eluding" "spreading" "mutating". All bullshit.

The majority of shooters by race are not white.
White guys make up 60% of the population in the US, and less than 60% of the shooters.

These are evil people pushing an evil narrative.

The dems felt it could take over by looking at demographics.

40% non-white.
30% white women.
30% white men.

When you combine both race and gender, white men become a minority. The dems creating a hate group that combines non-white everyone + white women would be 70%.

I mean - this is how a genicide-type hate group operates.

I assume they love their fathers, uncles, brothers.

American culture declares endless war on attachment, in order to "be the first" to get places and rake in profit from being the first people there. I'm not sure they have a lot of attachment left.

P.S. I don't remember the number but if I remember right > 40% of white women voted for trump, so perhaps it would be more accurate to say "liberal white women".

It's a power trip.

"The fact that people aren't accepting my abuse just shows the need for me to abuse them further".

Have you seen the shift in young men away from democrats and into being republican?

The reasonable men left, so the men they have left are crazier to begin with then start circlejerking each other into even more insanity.

One of the elements of facism is that the enemy is both weak and worthless, while simultaneously powerful beyond measure.

Look how manipulative they are. "Gender Affirming Healthcare" - this should be reassuring people the gender they're biologically born as is good and they are a-ok how they are.

Instead it's giving them extra special attention if they move towards genitally mutilating themselves.

"This strategy might be used for people we abuse to defend themselves against our continued, escalating abuse towards them"

I think Rollo Tomassi is the only person left seriously discussing the gender warfare/dating stuff. If your goal is to get away from the women-are-wonderful effect fresh and fit kinda illustrate which kind of women you're actually talking to online.

The "here's my exciting adventure of sleeping with women" types - from grifters to the halfway serious - always sorta fade out after a while. It's kinda predictable whether they're attacked or whether they're exalted, the game gets old and you lose interest in churning through more numbers and you get tired of reteaching the same stuff to people who react incredulously each time.

So...why do you think franken was sacrificed?

They weren't exactly shy at the time that franken needed to resign to give the appearance that they were serious about sexual harrassment in their own party, not just a tool the attack the other party with. They later abandoned that but it was what they were saying at the time.

I still love the comment on this site that said something like "GamerGate was fighting against Cluster B personality disorder women, so whenever they start saying gamergate tactics and gamergate led to this, they are often technically correct.

Anyone else notice how all those narratives they spit out about the last shooting happened to replace the fact that the cop who took down the shooter was a white guy, and a border patrol agent?

There's like 1 story mentioning that, then suddenly they're going on and on about open doors, closed doors, mothers supposedly rushing into the school, etc. The narratives bordered on right wing which seemed odd...then I realized they're spamming out anything to take the focus away from the only actual hero of the situation.

You are overestimating a lot their morals

I don't think they hate amber heard because of a sense of morality, they hate her because when men aren't around women are fighting amongst themselves and they just hate the amber heard type.

Women's game amongst themselves is some sort of flipping around between authenticity and manipulation, amber heard doesn't have authenticity. In girl battles she's the female equivalent of the man who comes to fight club and in the middle of the fight - pulls out a knife and starts stabbing the guy he's fighting.

Amber Heard is like if the non-schwarzenegger terminator in t2 won at the end of the movie. It's like if Dwight became the manager of The Office.

They don't hate her out of compassion for men, they hate her because they personally don't like her type.

It's first that people inherently care less about men than they do women.

It's second that feminism is a well funded political group entrenched in society, while mra's are just some random people.

That sounds nicer than the other ones I've seen, but it seems like the inherent paranoia turns nasty.

The issue is the attractive types have better career options vs becoming a political figure where you can't go to wendys without running into someone who thinks you're the devil.