Guy, shame simps. As soon as simps stop giving hoes money and attention, they will move on.

Instead of trying to make women flashing their snaches more rare and valuable, remove the incentives.

Bros don't let bros simp for hoes. Shame those guys. Tell him to be honest with himself and rent an actual whore.

But if they don't, they promise to learn the wrong lessons.

How many times was Tim Pool swatted? Eight? Fourteen? I lost count somewhere.

With a frame designed and fabricated by Gustave Eiffel, the Wizard of Iron. Shipped over here in parts and assembled by locals.

I am a huge fan of Gustave Eiffel and his work.

IMNHO it was a small internal faction of the CIA that recruited assets from a couple criminal groups to extend their reach.

I think that the conspirators then got one of their own put in charge of the investigation, and used that power to misdirect people, destroy actual evidence and generally cover things up.

I think that any worthwhile government records will have been destroyed decades ago.

Trump was convinced that the BLM riots were a state and local issue. Which they are.

While Trump could have called out the National Guard, it would have been a huge overreach of his power as president and he would have been clearly stepping on the toes of the individual states involved.

I don't know why city mayors and state governors are so happy to have their cities burned down, but they absolutely were.

Now I think he'd be much better at finding excuses to get the FBI involved, charging specific people with federal crimes as they apply. We will see.

Huh, I guess you do believe that men and women are alike.

Sort of? Men have far more motivation to find self-awareness because being a male is performative. Men are men because of what they do; and the benefits of their actions peak much later. Men who are effective gain resources and social status.

Womens' social value peaks at about 18 and their marriage value (sexual marketplace value) peaks at about 22. That gives them the most opportunity while they are still relatively immature.

It takes effort and discipline for people to develop their thinking and sense of self through the 7 Levels of Consciousness and (IMO) women get stuck more often at about level 3.

Christianity places an emphasis on moving up through the levels, and holds up Christ as an exemplar of the seventh level of consciousness. We both know that Christianity is out of fashion and often attacked by the media machine and the Neo-Marxist 5th column in the Academy.

To sum up: Men and women are more alike than different. Men are much more motivated by circumstance to become self-aware and to mature, mentally. Women can get plenty of rewards just by being pretty and hedonistic, having successfully removed all of the social stigma that used to be attached to slutty behavior.

And for the record, I have always thought promiscuity was bad for men too.

I don't know what the fuck is going on with Kissin. I do know that his family was an elite family1 in the USSR and then forced into exile for political reasons. Why this is causing him to (of late) attack the 'woke right' as he calls it is unknown to me. Noticing that London is about two political terms away from falling to Islamic interests is toxic or something?

I agree with your analyses. Lindsey is utterly terrified of a Christian revival and that White Men will organize and decide that their opponents are neatly color coded, or something.

This is something that Jordan Peterson has also spoken about. JP points out that White Anglo Saxon Protestant men are the most effective group in the history of the world, and should they turn their goals to violence that the rest of the world will not stand a chance.

I don't think the fear is particularly realistic at this juncture, but it isn't my irrational fear.

It would be very interesting to find out what causes a woman to be self aware and to value marriage and men in general.

I'd bet that it is more common in women who were raised with a positive father in the home, something which is becoming vanishingly rare.

Tony, do you want me to point you to the seamy side of reddit where thousands of women have the specific fantasy about being sexually abused by a MAGA 'fascist"?

Why on earth would you think what women wants has anything to do with reality? In general women think with their feelings and vote accordingly. In general, women are selfish, self-centered hedonists being lead around by their pussy. In 'all of history' women have never been more promiscuous.

You know that rape fantasies are just about the most common fantasies amongst women, right?

I don't mean the actual reality of terrible, brutal rape. I mean what they imagine it is like to have a hot, strong Chad not take no for an answer.

The more "liberal" a woman, the more common the fantasy. There have been studies on it.

For all their "WE ARE STRONG WOMEN", these feminists really just want to be men.

This is a foundational aspect of the feminist movement. It is (IMO) based on a very special blend of the apex fallacy and penis envy.

When the Declaration of Sentiments was written in 1848, women were a protected class. Men had legal obligations to pay her debts, feed, house and clothe their wives and daughters. There were legal repercussions for failing to do these things.

Divorce (which was always with cause) when won by a woman allowed her all of the benefits of marriage without any of the obligations. She was entitled to a house, food, etc. for life while her husband got nothing from her. Things were pretty sweet, as long as a woman got her shit together to pick a good match and build a life with her husband. The Feminist political movement repainted this situation as "absolute tyranny over [women]."

The Feminist political movement has imagined that all men are pussy-slaying Giga-Chads and applied political, legal and social pressure to get that for themselves.

A big part of the resentment that Feminists harbor is truly against the biological imperative to bear children and to raise them successfully. After the sexual revolution, they just ... don't really do that anymore. Women take hormonal birth control pills, pursue a career in an office and fuck every chad in 200 kilometers, starting with her collage campus. At 40 when the opportunities to party have dried up, she decides to enjoy the benefits of family and children; except she can't, so she buys cats.

Female teachers are getting there. The incidence of female teachers sleeping with young teenage students is many times higher than male teachers, per capita.

Are you serious? Is cup size the metric of maturity you want to see enforced?

Google Zhou Yaqin Chinese balance beam medalist. She is 19 now.

Does drawing a picture of Zhou Yaqin engaging in sexual acts deserve conviction and sentencing as a sex offender?

This thread is a discussion of new, proposed laws. About half the respondents are for it.

You know there are people like that in real life? Say, professional gymnasts or figure skaters.

If you draw one of these people, should you go to prison?

The central pillar of your argument is assuming that others, like yourself, are unable to distinguish representational art from real people.

I get that you really, really, don't like pedophiles. Your solution is to convict people on what they think rather than what they have done. That is a bridge too far.

"You thought about hurting a kid! That is the same as hurting a kid! Prison for you!"

That is bullshit.

If you want, argue that people who sexually abuse children should be shot. I won't even protest. As long as they actually did it.

I'm not going to go into it, but the Australian Aboriginal population has a fucking outrageous rate of child sexual abuse, intimate partner abuse, family violence, and more.

They get a free pass though, because reasons.

Meanwhile, your comic books can get you thrown in prison because you are not an Aboriginal.

This is not an exaggeration.

Child Porn is a strict liability crime.

If the law or legal officials declare an image as child porn (which is subjective) then just having it on your computer is enough for a conviction.

"Your honor, our legal process identified one pornographic image on @The_Shadow_of_Intent 's computer. It was a full frontal nude of a thirteen year old boy.

There is no question that this image was on his computer, therefore he is guilty."

Your only defense in this case is to admit that you did have an image of a nude boy, and then argue that it is a) a drawing, and b) not porn.

Under laws like this, the court does not have to accept your arguments.

Remember, this is strict liability. Someone sending this image to your email is sufficient to see you charged.

So, how keen are you to place yourself in this position, fully trusting that the legal process will produce a just result?

I am not even arguing. My favorite aircraft of all time is the F1-11, which was absolutely multi-role and started its life as a nuke delivery concept.

That said, it is a slider. On one side is "Fighter" and on the other side are ... other roles. The more the design compromises the fighter role, the better the aircraft gets at other things and the worse it is as a fighter.

It turns out that designs can get some ground attack capability and still be a great air superiority fighter; which can have tactical uses. It is great value. However I strongly feel that to excel in other roles dramatically compromises the air superiority capability.

None the less, my point is that supersonic air superiority fighters take the most amount of maintenance dollars per hour of flight time. It is cool to be able to drop two bombs half the world away in 20 hours (or whatever) but these days we send a cruse missile or a drone.

Not only that we now have the option of spreading total capability over two or three aircraft in an operation. One aircraft can be a spotter for a drone that can shoot missiles from over the horizon. New options are opening up with this kind of tactics.

Admit it guy, we both think sticking VTOL to a F-35 is a boondoggle. Scope creep is bullshit.

Seriously, the mission profile of the F18 Super Hornet is about perfect. An Air Superiority fighter which can launch from carriers and has a long operational range.

Fighters gain Air Superiority in a combat zone. Air-to-ground attack aircraft kill shit.

The A-10 is less expensive per hour of flight time than an attack helicopter. So use those. Send Reaper Drones (or whatever) as required.

The F-35 does everything but the maintenance costs are just stupendous when you cost them out per hour of air time.

I did not, in fact, outsource my critical thinking skills to something with less neurons than a snail.

I get your point.

I used one to put punctuation in a YouTube google video transcript recently. It took about 45 seconds, start to finish. It would have take me much longer.

Should I be pilloried?

I suspect that the place would immediately be drown under a torrent of stormfag wannabees calling for genocide for the Jews.

At that point the potential new members would drop to zero.

So, to be clear.

A person takes a blank piece of paper and a pencil. They draw something. They are then arrested, convicted of a felony and then added to a sex offender register for life.

And you think this is a good idea? You celebrate this law?