I just have a problem with suggesting there's $1.5t in fraud and all we have to do is get rid of the fraud then we can abolish taxes. This is mathematically incorrect and fairly naive.

There is fraud but it's not $1.5t worth. To abolish taxes, we'd need to get rid of government spending that wasn't fraud.

Okay, so prove it to me.

From my perspective, I think social programs are a waste of money but I don't think they're all fraud.

How do we prove to people that $1.5t is going to fraud?

Yeah, I'm not a fan of laws that prevent people from living how they want to live but I also understand why cities wouldn't want slums. They should allow them but keep them segregated, imo.

The issue is that "poverty" is just made up. It's not a real thing. There's no problem with people being poor nor is there a level of poor that's too poor. The concept of poverty is stupid. If you can't afford to live then you ought not to live.

The coffee fad was for millennial boss girls looking to signal their devotion toward career advancement. Zoomer girls are locked up in their bedrooms doing onlyfans and Uber eats for Starbucks just isn't worth it so they buy Starbucks much less frequently.

We all are literal slaves. That's what you are.

Some men lead and others follow. We're here because we're the followers and the men who led, specifically led us to this point.

No individual man has any power to do anything except get themselves thrown in prison or killed. Women follow power not example and no individual man has any power to lead.

I once calculated these numbers and came to a similar result.

I did not check the current numbers generated by the AI because of the fact that they aligned with what I once calculated.

I trust them because I know they align with what I once calculated.

I used the AI because last time I calculated these numbers it took me hours to find the data. The AI did it in 1 minute. Also, I find people trust AI more than they trust my numbers because most people don't understand how to verify if my numbers were correct but they're more inclined to trust an AI who they know is programmed to know how to calculate these things to provide somewhat accurate (rough) results.

Any issue women have with men was caused by women though which means women can solve the problem they've created by changing their own behavior but men can't change the problem of women by changing their own behavior. A man who hits the gym can't make women lose weight so at best the man is just competing for a shrinking group of women with an ever increasing group of men.

If men could sell to women, sure but women don't need to buy. There is a market to sell to gay guys and no, most guys aren't doing it.

Men aren't designed to sell sex but a woman is nothing but her sex.

Especially true the younger they are. Young men are like this to an extent too. I've found the hotter the man relative to the woman, the easier it is to convince the woman of anything the hotter man says.

I have a masters in financial stats so don't worry, I know all the limitations. Even with the limitations accounted for the numbers are bleak. I once calculated them myself as best I could and got worse numbers than what the AI came out with using some estimates in the ranges of covariances for the different factors.

I literally did include all of what you spoke of before and got worse numbers. I think the one factor I did include prior-to that ended with worse numbers was also "the woman never once engaged in any sex work including having an OF account"

Obviously no correlation exists between all these factors and the data doesn't exist to calculate them yourself so no matter what you're guestimating. As is the case with all projections.

I once did similar calculations myself prior to AI, as I did say in my post... the numbers I got with Google's AI were similar to the ones I once calculated myself. I actually calculated closer to 40,000 as opposed to 150,000 (my numbers were bleaker).

It did include single. My mistake.

Many women think men have gone downhill in quality but it's the opposite. Women's quality in the last 60 years is what has truly gone downhill. Men, are mostly the same. Women and their standards of men is mostly a joke because there's nothing wrong with the men but women don't want to admit they aren't valuable themselves so they come up with ridiculous standards as a self-defense mechanism to never have to come to terms with the fact they aren't 1 of the 150,000 women out there who actually are worth marrying for a man.

That's what I said though.

If you're looking for perfect, you aren't finding it. Even reasonable standards are out to lunch.

You need to be targeting overweight single black women with herpes 2 and children to stand a chance.

Why? BECAUSE WOMEN AREN'T PERFECT. If women were perfect, my post wouldn't have made sense. There'd be tons of women out there for the men if women were perfect. So thank you for agreeing with me.

Sounds like he's refering to something else with regard to "golden age".

For sharing ideas and discussing things that are outside the confines of what the establishment wants you to conform to, the past was the golden age. It was the Wild Wild West and it was fun.

However, if you need mainstream information for mainstream uses of said information then now is better for sure. I can find every recipe and cooking technique in a second. I can find detailed reviews on nearly every product or service in a second. We have tons of information now that's useful that we never had access to in the past but if I wanted to have a serious discussion about if society was a gynocracy, if we should change the laws because they're having a detrimental impact on quality of life and perhaps we need a more serious measure of QoL other than GDP and some wiki metric because of the inherent biases in them creating limitations in the usefulness of these measures... I can't really have it anywhere and the places I can have it at are now littered with Indians, governments, political activists and liberal mods who all have different motivations for throwing the discussion. Discussions used to be better even if every second user was a troll because the trolling tended to be intelligent in itself and proving a point with the trolling. The subtle art of trolling to actually add to the discussion was lost when the average IQ of internet users came down. And don't even get me started on like/upvoted and those systems that end up burrying real discussion from ever happening. The monetization of much of the internet has led to people fighting for hits rather than quality or serious nature of content. A problem Musk realized and has discussed but he lacks the capability of fixing.

Buy an escort dude. That's why they exist. For men like you. Your parents made a mistake in having you and you have to suffer the consequences until you die now.

Except, not many people around you do have what you want. You're just blind to see it.

How many of the men have a good looking wife? How many of these men had sex with their wife in the last week? How many of these men got to do what they wanted without their wife nagging at them for everything? How many of these men are 1 more bad spending decision of their wife causing them to be in bankruptcy. Then, how these men, in the next 5 years, how many will still have what you want? How many will have their wife leave them, owe child support and alimony, lose half their assets, not get to see their kid over some bullshit or limited time to see their kid? How many will have a kid that dies? Or a kid that themselves chooses never to have kids thus making your decision of passing on genetics a moot point?

Very very few people and especially men have what you want in this society.

Yes, that's a good idea too. What you should do starts with an R. That's what the 3rd world guys do to great success. But I won't tell you how to live your life.

The problem is that you want a lifestyle that only a select few of others are allowed to have but you were never born into it thus you were already destined never to live it from the day you were born. That's why you aren't allowed to live how you want but others are. Nothing can change this because it's decided by genetics and the circumstances of your parents. It's outside of your control. The idea that it's within your control is modern propaganda pushed by the have onto the have nots to try to maintain control. Even if you turned against those who have what you want to try to take it from them, through this process, in the end, you still would never get what you want. Don't have kids because your kids will be doomed to the same future you've been doomed to. Cut the line off. Choosing not to have kids has just as much impact on the future as having kids and it's still a torment on the haves because if every slave chose not to have kids, there would be no slaves and the masters wouldn't be masters anymore.

Then you should kill yourself (and I say that in the nicest way possible). Your parents failed you already by having you without already procuring the resources (women) to spread your genes. Break the chain and stop having kids when you are only going to doom them to a bleak future.

Parents that don't have substantial wealth and influence within social networks where they can essentially "hook up" their sons and daughters with whoever they want should not be having kids. Doing so causes tons of harm.

Your hand is free and you've already got an internet connection. The sad reality that 95% of men need to understand is that they'll never get a woman worthy of chasing so chasing women is a total waste of time/resources. Just focus on other things and some ugly fat chick will eventually decide she wants you then you can take her in if you want to procreate that badly, otherwise it's best to stay away from most women. 95% of men can't afford to have standards and they can't afford to have a woman. The other 5% can and do have standards.

100%, I do believe it was orchestrated but what they did was create the systems that then go on to self perpetuate the propaganda without much need for any control over them.

It's not a top-down directive that is continuously ordered and maintained such that if we just cut off the head of the snake, everything reverts back to square one. We've now entered an era where all the previously brainwashed people are running the system that was created with the purpose such that these brainwashed people would end up promoting the original objectives of what the puppet masters wanted without the puppets even taking in any new orders.

The carebear vs. hardcore gamer issue with gaming was always a problem and especially in the MMORPG space before women.

What WoW did was prove the carebear model was more profitable and thus all gaming companies and especially MMOs chased the carebear model. This didn't ruin gaming so much as it ruined MMORPGs but frankly, MMORPGs were dying out anyway before WoW because the nature of hardcore gamers is that they don't like to play if someone else has an advantage and they don't like to play if they can't gain an advantage over someone else, so after any initial game launch, a group would gain an advantage such that everyone else (even if they were a hardcore gamer) would quit the game, then the server pop would decrease and the company would pull the plug.

Outside of MMORPGs, there's a lot of different reasons for the destruction of games. I was a pro CS 1.1-1.3 player and I could go on for hours about how and why FPS games were ruined... but instead I'll focus on single-player RPG games.

The issue truly does come down to hiring female developers. The reason is because of the difference in the nature between men and women. When men do fantasy, they create characters that they want to be like as the primary motivation and then they make these characters somewhat like them as the secondary motivation. A nerdy guy who can't get girls makes a hot dude with a harem but has qualities somewhat like himself (the dude is smart and isn't a brute). When women do fantasy, they create characters like themselves as a primary then make the characters somewhat like what they want to be like. So when you hire ugly adversarial feminist lesbians to program you fantasy games, what do you get? You get ugly adversarial feminist lesbians as the main character who also save the world (but as the secondary). This completely ruined gaming for men, yet it didn't necessarily help expand the target demographic because not every woman out there is an ugly adversarial feminist lesbian but when you hire these women to make your games, they will make the games about themselves rather than make the games in a manner that truly expands the target demographic BUT at the MBA meetings, the women will lie and say they believe this will expand the target demographics. The useless boomer executes/investors don't understand how things work and it sounds plausible so they go with it. The result actually has been the destruction of the video gaming market without the boomers or feminists either having a clue why.

A bunch of White men who understood things and wanted to expand the target demographic could still make video games that both men and women enjoyed without the bias that female developers would have on how they were making the games.

The average person doesn't care about the future. Give a man $10m and some young girls (Epstein Island) to fuck & he'll see his entire civilization destroyed as long as it's destroyed after he's gone.

This is what the jews discovered. This is why it's a "slow boil" and not imminent destruction. Most people are sellouts. You are too. I guarantee you are. If you were offered $10m and hot women to worship your cock if you just did nothing, you would take it. Because the alternative is no money, no women and a lifetime of hardship with 0 reward.

Nothing changes until we take away the resources of the rich and powerful. Only when there is no way to offer a man $10m and hot whores will change happen. The only way to reasonably accomplish this is to destroy all power plants. Without electricity, people's quality of life will drop and it will drop suddenly. But until then, enjoy the decline. Nothing will change. Our leaders don't care about us and never will because they have $10m and hot whores to fuck. Our leaders are comfortable doing nothing except what the jews want so they will do nothing except what the jews want because it's easy and they are comfortable.

In my experience (and I have lots). If a woman isn't fat, does her lips and/or nails and has visible tattoos in her casual clothes, there's like a 90% chance she works in the sex industry or at least did at one point.

Of sex industry workers who are 25yo+, there's like a 75% chance they have herpes-2. When you hear the story of the "reformed slut", which is the girl who was a huge slut who decided she's no longer a slut and wants to settle down, oftentimes it's because they caught herpes-2 and it had a negative impact on their mentality with regard to casual sex. Instead, of just sleeping with everyone they finally realized their mistake and now are embarassed and too self-conscious from the herpes to continue doing it. These are the "good ones" (often the ones without tattoos) since many actually still continue to sleep around despite the herpes and don't give a fuck.

Now, there's tons of fat ugly women on Reddit with tattoos because these women wanted to be like the hot girls in high school (who went on to become sex workers) so these Reddit tier whales emulated what they saw the hot girls who were banging the hot men do (get tattoos) in hopes it would help them snag a bad boy (but it didn't help). Many women have tattoos and the tattoos ultimately mean nothing because these women are failures in other regards but skinny women who're somewhat pretty with visible tattoos who put effort into their look (lips/nails/hair/makeup/fake tits) are almost always run through whores and especially past 25yo. They're ratchet chicks. These are the kinds of girls who work as a waitress, then fuck a sugar daddy before heading back home to their black boyfriend, masturbate on cam for OF then head to the gangbang party. If you don't want to catch herpes, stay away.