Prior to AI, I had done a lot of research into the dating stats and made some pretty bleak posts on ConPro about it. Now, we have AI (Germini Pro) so I got the AI to do the heavy lifting for me this time.
The estimated number of women in the USA who are White, single, between the ages of 18-25yo, don't have children, are not overweight, do not have herpes-2, have had 0-3 previous sexual partners, consider themselves right-wing politically and don't have visible tattoos in casual clothes is 150,000. That's 150,000 in the whole country.
If you live in a city with 1m people, there's on average about 440 women living in this city who meet this standard.
On the other hand the number of single men who are aged 18-35 is about 25m.
That means in a city of 1m there's about 73,500 men you're competing against for this kind of woman, of which, there are only 440.
You need to be in the top 0.05% of men if this is what you're after.
What makes you think you're in the top 0.05% of men?
Of course your own preferences, the preferences of the women and preferences of the men you're competing against matter to a degree but something tells me even when that's factored in, you're still scraping from the bottom.
If we just compare the number of single women without kids who are aged 18-35 (16.5m vs single men (25m) you still need to be in the top 66% of all these men to even have a shot at the loweat quality woman.
Now imagine being a man with standards. If you have standards, you better be in the top 0.1% of men or you don't stand a chance.
Especially true the younger they are. Young men are like this to an extent too. I've found the hotter the man relative to the woman, the easier it is to convince the woman of anything the hotter man says.
A woman's willingness to behave in a relationship is inversely related to her (perceived) ability to monkey branch to someone taller, richer, etc. It's why they'll let Chad beat the living shit out of them but cuck and divorce rape men who are near their SMV level. You have to have a significant attractiveness advantage over any woman you're with for there to be any hope of it being a net positive. Even then it only works if she's not delusional which is rare in the age of dating apps and social media.
Nah, everyone gets this wrong. Women cuck weak men. Women defer to leaders. Felon chad smacks her around, aka he's in charge. Beta Dave asks for her permission like a good boy, aka he's a follower.
Be a leader and your woman will respect you. Treat her like your equal in the marriage and she will cuck you. The ship can only have one captain and nobody wants a captain that's indecisive and deferring to everyone else for decisions.
Humans naturally see taller, more conventionally attractive men as leaders by default, however. If you are short and ugly, you have to earn the respect.
You're right. I've seen taller attractive men immediately lose leadership status by acting beta however.
That's why we need to go back to women being property, they need to be left without any means of escape so that behaving properly is their ownly option.
"if you wanna be happy for the rest of your life..."