Prior to AI, I had done a lot of research into the dating stats and made some pretty bleak posts on ConPro about it. Now, we have AI (Germini Pro) so I got the AI to do the heavy lifting for me this time.
The estimated number of women in the USA who are White, single, between the ages of 18-25yo, don't have children, are not overweight, do not have herpes-2, have had 0-3 previous sexual partners, consider themselves right-wing politically and don't have visible tattoos in casual clothes is 150,000. That's 150,000 in the whole country.
If you live in a city with 1m people, there's on average about 440 women living in this city who meet this standard.
On the other hand the number of single men who are aged 18-35 is about 25m.
That means in a city of 1m there's about 73,500 men you're competing against for this kind of woman, of which, there are only 440.
You need to be in the top 0.05% of men if this is what you're after.
What makes you think you're in the top 0.05% of men?
Of course your own preferences, the preferences of the women and preferences of the men you're competing against matter to a degree but something tells me even when that's factored in, you're still scraping from the bottom.
If we just compare the number of single women without kids who are aged 18-35 (16.5m vs single men (25m) you still need to be in the top 66% of all these men to even have a shot at the loweat quality woman.
Now imagine being a man with standards. If you have standards, you better be in the top 0.1% of men or you don't stand a chance.
You're right. I've seen taller attractive men immediately lose leadership status by acting beta however.
True