18
Bouldabassed 18 points ago +18 / -0

Glad he is putting them on blast but don't trust him for a second. Cernovich's reply is pretty perfect actually.

12
Bouldabassed 12 points ago +12 / -0

All other incidents aside, the first assassination attempt is the most "Nat 20" situation there is. More like rolling a Nat 20 with disadvantage. Dude had him dead to rights.

Edit: this comment made me realize once again how well they succeeded at memory holing that fiasco.

7
Bouldabassed 7 points ago +7 / -0

Okay, we'll see I guess. I certainly wouldn't need or care for an apology, I just ask people to look back and reflect. God knows I've seen retards (not you) post so much shit over the years that doesn't pan out and I'm left wondering if they ever acknowledged it and tried to correct going forward.

13
Bouldabassed 13 points ago +13 / -0

You've said this multiple times but what is your basis for it? Will you go back and reflect on where you went wrong when it inevitably doesn't happen?

I agree with most of what you post around here but this seems like baseless retardation posted smugly as if you're confident about something you shouldn't be that confident over.

3
Bouldabassed 3 points ago +3 / -0

True lol because they're dumber than a box of rocks and don't understand how the other side talks and thinks.

6
Bouldabassed 6 points ago +6 / -0

If God offered me a deal that if this is a hoax I get $50 and if it's real he smites me dead on the spot, I would take it so damn fast that's how certain I am this is a leftoid writing this.

18
Bouldabassed 18 points ago +18 / -0

I could have maybe believed it if it came up once. They said it like every single sentence. Completely laughable that they think people are retarded enough to fall for this.

5
Bouldabassed 5 points ago +5 / -0

Vance tweeted about this just a bit ago. Quit the doomposting and black pilling and just see how it plays out. The take is reasonable depending on how it's interpreted. Fed provacateurs don't deserve pardons.

9
Bouldabassed 9 points ago +9 / -0

While I understand what you're saying in theory, I wonder what percentage of actual cases were Japanese men running with a kid vs a Japanese woman doing so. Anecdotally, all the cases I ever heard about were women. Take that with a grain of salt.

20
Bouldabassed 20 points ago +20 / -0

People need to keep the pressure on and hold him to the fire on it.

That being said, we can't lose track of what we have here. Holy grails like ending birthright citizenship are actually on the table as a possibility. Keep steadily pushing to shift public perception and the overton window for this issue.

23
Bouldabassed 23 points ago +23 / -0

On one hand I could totally believe it's true. On the other hand I could also totally see her making shit up to secure a fat payment. The only thing I can be completely sure of is that I really don't give a shit either way.

1
Bouldabassed 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can find people saying no and people saying yes; it kind of exists on the edge. But as someone who played it for years I would definitely say no seeing as you don't buy currency or resources to gamble on receiving things.

There is an RNG system for constructing certain ships and equipment, but generally not the best ships and equipment, and one doesn't use resources from the shop to use those systems even if they spend money on the game.

So it depends where you personally draw the line.

1
Bouldabassed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmm? Kancolle isn't a gacha game even if it kind of seems like one in some respects. Waifu collecting shitfest, sure. But not a gacha. I played it for years and while there are microtransactions and pay to win, there isn't a gacha that you pay into.

New ships are introduced as event rewards and drops for clearing event maps. Not through ship construction. You don't buy from the shop to roll for ships or equipment.

4
Bouldabassed 4 points ago +4 / -0

I used to work at the facility that processes and sends out those cards. There's been a big backup since they outsourced most of the jobs to Indians.

5
Bouldabassed 5 points ago +5 / -0

Legit didn't even register for me he was talking about this place until reading this comment.

11
Bouldabassed 11 points ago +11 / -0

"Hurr durr why are you concerned about X when Y is the same thing but worse??"

This argument is never not retarded. Maybe just maybe people can be capable of being concerned about both? But when the spotlight is on X there should be no need to add a disclaimer about Y whenever it's mentioned.

1
Bouldabassed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your musings on this issue are so wildly off of the reality of the situation that your idea can be ignored entirely. We're facing the systemic genocide of White people across the entire planet, and you're arguing about things which will never happen.

My "musings" are far closer to something that could happen than yours of shutting off any and all immigration "until our countries are fixed and run by our own people." Realistically, both are relatively unlikely in the current situation though, unfortunately.

My people are being genocided intentionally, and you call it "sperging out". Find better words to use. That, or you're revealing your true feelings, that you revile White people, and think we don't have natural rights, like having our own homes and nations, the right to protect our borders, the right to associate with whom we choose, the right to control who enters our homes and nations, the right to collectivize, the right to espouse and enforce our views, the right to violently stop the people hurting us.

I'm calling it what it is. You're turning away people who are 99% on your side with your retardation. I'm every bit as white as you, and yet in a couple of comments back and forth, you took "it would be best if we could let in like 100 geniuses and leave it at that" and turned it into "you're revealing your true feelings, that you revile white people." There is no universe where that isnt sperging.

I understand it's a very important issue and things can get emotional, but holy shit come on.

2
Bouldabassed 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're greatly overstating the coherence and cogence of the people sperging and cherry picking the worst and most simplistic counter arguments in an attempt to paint yourself in a positive light, but we both know you're well aware that's what you're doing.

It's not a binary "open the jeet floodgates and die" versus "shut them completely and prosper" kind of situation. I think it's good that this has been put into the limelight, but yes, people who are willing to throw away two very capable and powerful allies over this spat are shortsighted and not acting in a pragmatic manner. To the point it's understandable some would come to expect nefarious intent.

Doomposting and black pilling are almost never productive. Call out what you think is wrong and present what you think good solutions look like. Don't go around posting "we're finished," "Trump is done before even assuming office," etc. It's entirely counterproductive to your stated desires and goals.

One of the upsides to a Vivek / Elon vs a Soros is the level of transparency. This debate is taking place out in the open and putting a spotlight on this issue that it hasn't gotten before. This is inherently good for people who want to strictly clamp down on immigration; sperging and doomposting is not.

4
Bouldabassed 4 points ago +4 / -0

It legit seems like it sometimes, but some are users I generally recognize as being coherent most of the time. Just frothing at the mouth and not even reading things completely before responding the past couple days. "If I don't get 100% what I want right now then it's all over." Childish and unproductive.

9
Bouldabassed 9 points ago +9 / -0

Trump was never going to flat out rebuke what Musk was saying. Under his administration H1B rejections steadily rose each year. Is it as drastic a change as I would want? No. But I won't act like the sky is falling when I get what I expected instead of getting something way beyond expectations. Anyone who expected all jeet influx to end immediately is either retarded or feigning ignorance in order to doompost.

On the immigration front the influx from the southern border is an order of magnitude larger than the jeets. He's looking like he will be better on the former this time, so I'll be happy if he stays where he was on the latter. We will never get everything we want all at once.

14
Bouldabassed 14 points ago +14 / -0

Seriously, people need to calm down. It's a given Trump is going to be less restrictive on legal immigration than most on this board, myself included, would want. The question is only how much. The vague comments in this article do nothing to clarify how the next few years will look. It's not a binary case of Unlimited Jeet Works or nothing.

MAGA is not "dead" due to a couple vague and non commital comments in a NYPost article. People are beyond ridiculous.

1
Bouldabassed 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't comment on H1B at all. I was making a statement on legal immigration in general. When I say 100 people, I'm talking about literal genius level talent, the likes of which is limited to a very small handful of people globally. The 0.0001%. I'm not talking about the hordes of 10s of thousands of pajeets.

Bringing in geniuses on the scale of 100s of people annually (in reality it might not even be that many), is not a slow death when it's a country of 300 million people, and it's ridiculous to suggest that it would be.

You've sperged about a lot of things wrong with the current system that I would largely agree with, but it has nothing to do with my comment. Yes, I would absolutely agree that we should be poaching the Norweigan genius as well. As a matter of fact, given the IQ distribution of a lot of the less desirable races, the foreign white or asian (chink not brown) genius should be much more common than the pajeet ones. It's all about creating a system with strict guidelines and ensuring it isn't exploited for uses beyond those that were intended.

I would agree that as executed now, these programs could be scaled down by like 99% or more, and I can't be bothered to go back and forth about where to draw that line within the remaining 1% when we are so far away from what either of us would want at this point. I'm content to just agree that we know which direction things need to be pushed; we can quabble over when to stop pushing later.

7
Bouldabassed 7 points ago +7 / -0

A lot of people were sperging out hard on this board but it's true that Elon is wrong here and most of the people pointing that out are largely right. Just need to be tactical about it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›