Yeah I noticed this as well. This is clearly done by somebody progressive in translation or the US office trying to impose it on the Japanese developers.
I'm all for more customization options like being able to put all voices, hairstyles, and beards on both sexes, but removing "male" and "female" is just biology denial.
It's quite clear that a lot of people are willing to submit to new measures at a moment's notice. It depends on the social network in question because a lot of these grew on Tumblr and have developed more on Twitter. I could see norms being changed as the internet cultures continue to develop further.
People are worried about things like birth control adding more xenoestrogen to the water supply. As well as the potential damage of micro plastics entering the body or insecticide on plants, but I haven't looked too deeply into things like that.
It's clear that something is happening. This is shown by how much men's testosterone counts have been dropping heavily since the 1970's.
I believe she is Jewish or at least her family seem to be, whoever put up that religious symbol on the front of their door.
The media didn't post the advertisement Germany made in WW1 to not board passenger liners to Europe. And it hasn't changed since then. It has been fully compromised.
At least now we have the internet, but that obviously can't reach everybody the same way centralized news can.
Not too surprising. There are so many accounts with virtue signaling that it will happen eventually, and most PR or social media people are on the progressive side. Unless a higher up at the company explicitly says "Avoid controversial issues or you'll be in trouble" then it's up to people like HR, and you know how that will end up.
Yeah polls are about how they want people to feel, not how they actually do.
They can manipulate the numbers by framing the question a certain way, changing the answers, and deciding which groups should be polled. That's if they're not just making up numbers as well.
I recently saw this post and it definitely seems relevant.
Modern environmentalism has always been that way. Its main purpose is to distract from the fact that the vast majority of pollution comes from massive companies, and instead blame average citizens. You end up with an industry which capitalizes on the overly emotional and naive and is incentivized to never actually solve what it claims it wants to.
You will also see these kinds of arguments when it comes to overpopulation. The logic is that fewer people leads to less pollution, which doesn't actually work that way. And at the same time they argue to bring in massive numbers of people from the third world and fund those countries with huge amounts of foreign aid which increases how much they impact the environment.
That seems to be the case. Some people end up getting away with a lot because of connections and then get lazy thinking they are totally safe. It's only until somebody high up gets really exposed that the whole thing falls apart, because there's no way to cover for them.
I'm just saying that the media's tactics to discredit something is to immediately call it a "forgery" which has nothing to do with the content itself, just that it was not the original source. You see this a lot with historical documents that people would rather not want to be acknowledged.
I haven't actually read it myself, just seen the knee-jerk response that happens when somebody isn't willing to outright dismiss it. And with the recent amount of things being "debunked" that tends to mean you should give it pause, but obviously not totally believe it because of that alone.
In this article they lump together many different conspiracies as well.
I suppose the truth of that claim depends a bit on how you define "current day." But the certainty that international Jewry was plotting to enslave the world and had even boldly transcribed its plan in a book called The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion swept the globe 120 years ago and is, even now, popular in Japan and the Middle East. The manic belief that the murder of John F. Kennedy more than half a century back was the sinister centerpiece of a coup by (take your pick) the CIA, the Mafia, Big Oil, or World Communism is still a planetary obsession. Then there are the 9/11 Truthers, the faked moon landing crowd, and of course the cabal of Freemasons who sank the Titanic. And don't get me started on the cover-up of Paul McCartney's death.
Before GamerGate I barely gave these kinds of things the time of day, but you end up with "If they're trying so hard to slander this one thing I know, what else are the media lying about?" becomes a much more compelling thought. I have since gained the belief that many of those things are not to be dismissed so quickly.
Oh right I forgot about that, and the fact that Jewish people accused of sexual crimes in the US can always go back there as well. They need to step up when it comes to interracial marriages then! China's way ahead in that area with the Uighur's, very progressive.
Yeah, they'll say "Oh they don't actually care about this ideology, they're just doing it for the money!" while major companies and governments burn cash at an unprecedented rate to instill out-group biases in advertising and education.
They aren't "racist" they're just anti-white. Racism is nothing more than an attack word used to make people back down. These people are the ideological descendants of those who popularized and made the term, it does not intimidate them.
The "true believers" will just shout back "You're the bigger racist!" to which the public will silently agree out of fear. If you call them anti-white, they may deny it or better yet try to show how that's a good thing. The public will begin to think in terms of pro-white and anti-white, at least in a very small part.
If somebody cannot be in favour of their innate nature, then they are so possessed by shame that you would be able to puppeteer them into doing anything.