1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +5 / -4

the Quran explicitly states that the Bible is true and correct. the last dinner is part of Muslim cannon.

2
ApparentlyImAHeretic 2 points ago +2 / -0

where's a good place to read the direct text of the Talmund? I keep finding mixed results, often with certain passages having wildly different translations.

by Lethn
-4
ApparentlyImAHeretic -4 points ago +1 / -5

how many times must I say that pointing at the advantages of something does not equal support for it. my stance on race mixing is 100% neutral, can you smooth brains even comprehend the concept of neutrality?

EDIT: apparently not

by Lethn
0
ApparentlyImAHeretic 0 points ago +1 / -1

I agree, that makes these riots marginally better than the summer of love. but the anger is still directed at the symptom and not the cause. as a result, public support will decline, the crackdown will be severe, and the end result will be worse than when they left off.

by Lethn
-5
ApparentlyImAHeretic -5 points ago +1 / -6

terrorism does not help the cause. normies hate it.

if you actually want to change something through violence, you have to get organized and focus on the sources of the issue. the migrant hotels are not the source of the issue, they are a symptom, and these riots don't seem to have organization.

Without organization, they are ultimately doomed to fail. this is how public support for black lives matter declines so sharply, and it is how public support for the anti-immigration movement will decline. without public support you just have more resistance, or worse support for the opposing side.

generating enemy soldiers is not a winning strategy.

by Lethn
9
ApparentlyImAHeretic 9 points ago +9 / -0

I disagree, the majority of the illegal immigrants are dependent on government welfare which is perpetuated by the Democrats. the Democrats are not shy about reminding them of this.

by Lethn
-22
ApparentlyImAHeretic -22 points ago +2 / -24

arson

I don't care that their cause is just, this tactic is never justified.

5
ApparentlyImAHeretic 5 points ago +5 / -0

gaming itself is compromised. even singal player games report back to headquarters. if you want to game, don't game on a machine that also contains sensitive personal information.

1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +1 / -0

fair, but it still comes. a dissatisfied populace or weak leadership would make a country ripe for conquering.

1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +3 / -2

the problem with elites holding the reins is that it inevitably leads to collapse. as generations go by, and elites are born into elite life, their position is taken more and more for granted. eventually their distant children have a more skewed view of the world than the lowly peasants do, and the unrest begins to fester (you are here). barring a voluntary and peaceful change in the ruling class, elites eventually get overrun and destroyed without mercy. This destruction comes either from the peasants, or neighboring societies looking to capitalize on the weakness.

It happened with Nero, it happened with Mary Antoinette, it happened with Tsar Nicholas, and it will happen here eventually. The time from inception to destruction varies greatly, but it goes without fail.

1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +1 / -0

if that's what happened, it sounds like he got what he deserved.

0
ApparentlyImAHeretic 0 points ago +1 / -1

the term "Cis" is only ever used in a derogatory manner. It's a way to identify people as not being part of the alphabet club and therefore not worthy of praise.

People who call you cis do not respect you, and are not worth your time.

2
ApparentlyImAHeretic 2 points ago +2 / -0

you put words in his mouth, then argued against those words. he never demonstrated anything about being obsessed with witness in this conversation, so why would you accuse him of doing so?

you need to read what people are actually saying, and argue against them on their merits. you can't just assume things about people.

1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +1 / -0

yes, it's a slur. I have yet to meet a tranny who doesn't deserve it.

1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +1 / -0

if you look at my post history, you'll know that I hardly ever use this term. all you have done this entire conversation is fabricate things that your opponents never said, and argue against those fabrications. you never engage their arguments, heck you never even demonstrate that you even read their arguments past the first few sentences.

I'm trying to teach you how to be convincing, and how to actually reach people. I'm trying to help you.

34
ApparentlyImAHeretic 34 points ago +35 / -1

sentenced

good. thieves deserve prison.

to 15 years

Not even drug dealers or child abusers get this much jail. Clown world.

15
ApparentlyImAHeretic 15 points ago +15 / -0

why in the absolute fuck would you even try to put yourself through that if you don't enjoy it? This isn't even degeneracy at this point, it seems like it's self conditioning to be a tranny.

1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +1 / -0

make up argument, put it in your opponent's mouth, argue against that made up argument

I got news for you: that's called straw-manning.

examples from your rant:

you only seem to become concerned about "the children" when they or their families object to your own agenda: LGBTQ+ kids, kids with different political views, kids who reject your own political views, etc. You go absolutely wild for those kids, yet ignore every other child out there and their suffering.

your opponent never mentioned "the children", """alphabet""" kids, or anything of the like. This was purely your own fabrication.

Sometimes you even PRAISE child brides, teenagers literally sold by their families to adult men like property

citation heavily needed. your opponent never mentions this, you just made it up.

Do you care? Do you make posts mourning the children and sending prayers to their families? NO! You outright tell the victims of school shootings that their children's murders were hoaxes and then harass grieving families. Child soldiers? Children in poverty? Homeless children? Disabled children? You. Don't. Care.

so you ask a whole bunch of questions, then answer them for your opponent and attack the answers you yourself gave him. it doesn't get more straw-manning than that.

On a side note, making social media posts about a tragedy is about as pathetic as calling it a hoax. all it does is sensationalize the events and help spread misinformation.

It's clear you have a statement to make. in order to actually reach people, you need to understand their position. Straw-manning is counterproductive to this goal.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›