Several months ago, there was a movie I caught a few minutes of, that my parents were watching before I came over to have dinner with them. It was the story of a black woman working for NASA during the space race, who was the modern feminist trope: the strong empowered woman who's better and smarter than everyone else, and who's the key to everything (making our space program work). They even made all the surrounding White men stupid and evil. I couldn't roll my eyes hard enough. Don't know the name of it, though.
I'm trying to red pill my family as much as possible, but it's a slower process with my parents, and some days are a struggle.
Agreed. I'll take it even further, and it applies to all groups of humans, regardless of pursuit. It's also why hobbies always start out with small, passionate groups, and the more "normies" enter it, the more it becomes watered down, pushing out the people who started it because they can no longer stand the medium or the people part of it.
Not sure how this can be combated, except through stringent gate keeping, and as a general rule, having a healthier wider society, with healthier and better people as part of the larger group of people/nation, that are less prone to watering down niche groups, and less wanting to do so, knowing the destructive nature of it.
In my experience, the passionate yet small indie devs in gaming make less buggy games than AAA studios. Bugs have nothing to do with complicated code and unsolvable problems related to computer hardware. Like all other things in a job, it comes down to the competency of the people working. AAA studios are much more likely to hire and employ useless people, fulfilling the Pareto principle. Smaller, more passionate groups are less likely to be accepting of idiots, slackers, and parasites.
Even hinting at the above 3 globalist foundational sins (at least with how it's enforced on us plebs) is an infraction worthy of unpersoning in the new world order.
Eh, maybe. If Matt Walsh wasn't controlled opposition, and came out with something that promoted racial differences, or in the extreme case started speaking badly about jews, I absolutely think he'd be censored. Talk about those topics results in censorship of big and small folk.
I agree that spirituality is a part of it, because the people in power are so vociferously anti Christian and increasingly becoming more open about being satanic, but I think constant failure at step 5, society wide, is due to people being brainwashed by most of society's institutions, preventing them from being able to properly identify the problem(s), and proposing solutions that work. It's also because the mainstream parties, politically and culturally, are largely captured and corrupt, a false choice trap, where they constantly misdefine problems and enact solutions that will never work, giving people the illusion of choice and resistance.
Because Scott Adams broke one of the foundational sins of the globalist world order: racism. Matt Walsh didn't. Weirdly, even though Walsh believes in differences among the sexes, which is almost always attributed to genetic differences, this doesn't pass over to believing in racial differences due to genetic variance, at least in normie territory for politics. However, Walsh is clearly protected, given who he works for.
There are two other subjects which form the trifecta of globalist sin, discussion of anything bad about jews, and anything contrary to the official history of WW2. White nationalism could be another topic, but if someone holds a view contrary to the globalists on the above 3 topics, they're usually an ethno nationalist at the minimum, anyway. Whatever your position on these subjects, every captured, corrupt, false choice, globalist subversive, and ineffectual normie, left or right, believes the mainstream position on these topics, and as such, they're increasingly becoming the best way to identify people you can trust and those you can't.
Of course it's never that simple, as there will always be outliers, but as the world slides into insanity, the dividing lines and identifiers will become increasingly apparent.
I agree, it does get old, and while you seem close to realizing the true reason, hinting at it, you didn't express it in your post.
The reason why you get fed up with non stop talking about problems is because it's non productive, perpetually kept in the early stages of the problem solving process, neutered of the entire point of talking about a problem.
Step 1: Acknowledge that a problem exists.
Step 2: Properly define and understand the problem.
Step 3: Propose possible solutions.
Step 4: Enact solutions.
Step 5: If proposed solutions fail, return to step 2 or 3 as needed and repeat.
Societal wide problems require communication and en masse action. However, if everyone on our side is perpetually stuck merely talking about a problem, and never acting to fix it, then they're not interested in solving the problem, only bitching about it to other people who also see it, in the hopes of getting money or fame from the popularity. Even worse, it's an intentional control mechanism to keep people trapped in the middle stages of the problem solving process without actually acting to fix them, or the controlled opposition continually misdefines the problem(s) and proposes solutions that never work. This is how the majority of mainstream right wing operates.
It should also be noted that bitching about a difficult problem to others, expecting other people to fix them, is womanly behavior. Anyone that's been in a relationship with a woman will understand. Seeing so many men do this speaks poorly of how much our society, and our men have been feminized.
Here's the link to the song:
It's one (another) of the reasons why I think nationalists are more right than anyone else. People are extremely tribal by nature. It appears to be genetically hardwired into all life as a survival mechanism, most notably for social creatures (like humans). They like and forgive their own for almost anything, but attack and hate "the other" for almost anything.
Not just that, but it's a fallacious argument that we can't have multiple interests. I use ConPro more than any other forum, but I still make occasional comments in funny, KiA2, and gaming. I'd comment in other communities, but the site is so small that the hobbies/interests I have are pretty inactive here and don't make it to the trending page.
I grew up playing video games, and I still game a little bit to relax. Just because I use ConPro more than other forums doesn't immediately invalidate my other interests and make my statements about them wrong, and it doesn't make my posts or comments "brigading". That's a Reddit tier argument used to ban all dissent. Remember how Reddit power mods started banning users who merely participated in wrongthink subs?
I still have strong opinions about Hollywood, TV shows, and movies, even though I cancelled cable years ago, don't subscribe to any streaming service, and very rarely go see a movie in the theater. Just because I'm less actively involved in something doesn't mean I can't have an opinion, or that it's "brigading".
Your mistake is assuming that this site wasn't taken over by subversives. The actions of Doggos, -f-b-i-, and the other TheDonald mods prove what their priorities are, and it isn't free speech.
When people were saying he wasn't fit to be a mod for c/gaming, or that he should mod other people, he said he could do it by himself, and admitted to being a mod on Reddit subs with over 100,000 users. The stereotype definitely fits.
The basic rundown of what happened:
It all happened over the last week. Hexen made a post pointing out the Holocaust museum map added to Fortnite. Lots of comments were pointing out that the Holocaust was fake. They ended up being censored by CisSiberianOrchestra, and then the entire post was censored. I messaged Hexen to let him know what happened. Hexen then started pushing Cis's buttons by making fun of the bullshit "no racism" rule, and those posts were censored. Hexen then made another legitimate gaming post, with no racism in it, and that was censored.
Then there was a meta post where people were talking about what was going on in the forum, and rightfully criticized what Cis was doing. Cis claimed he censored the comments and posts because it was "brigading", which doesn't make sense. Cis threw a tantrum, modded Fishyman420, the most hated user there, pinned a message to the forum admitting that he did it just to spite the forum and the users, and then stepped down as a mod. If all the censored stuff was due to brigading, Cis wouldn't have punished the entire community, unless he hated the community.
People quickly got wind that Fishy was now a mod, people rapidly declared the forum was dead, started unsubbing from the forum, and criticized Fishy's hypocrisy and poisonous behavior in further meta threads about the situation. Fishy claimed he would be a magnanimous hyper efficient mod, being fair (except to the evil racists and Nazis), and that he didn't need any mod help (he didn't want to mod anyone else and take away from his power trip), and then he began censoring stuff. To his credit, he did approve certain posts and comments, but the dude is a known liar and hypocrite.
The entire community knew the "no racism" rule and what Cis censored was bullshit. C/gaming is pretty genuine. I never see brigading there. Pretty much all the users there want the "no racism" rule removed entirely or severely neutered.
In any case, I'm pretty sure C (the site wide admin) removed Fishy as mod, deleted Cis's pinned "fuck you" message, and now the forum is having an open discussion about who should become mod(s), and what the rules are going to be.
Cis admitted that's what he did in the pinned comment in c/gaming, that he made FishyMan420 a mod to spite the users and forum, even though he knew Fish is hated by everyone, and then Cis stepped down. However, after Fishy was removed as a mod yesterday due to overwhelming backlash, C (the site wide admin) recently deleted that pinned message.
The funny part is that CisSiberianOrchestra, the mod who sperged out, claimed they censored comments and posts because it was all "brigading" by us evil fascists. However, because Cis was getting so much justified backlash, from the gaming community itself, as a final "fuck you" to the forum and its users, he made FishyMan420 a mod, the most annoying and hated user in that community (and elsewhere).
If all of this was being caused by brigading, then why would Cis punish the "genuine" users by modding the most hated user? It doesn't make sense. So either Cis was lying when it was brigading, or he was lying when he said he could genuinely moderate a gaming forum (this is implicit and doesn't need to be said), which means he hates gaming and gamers.
It's also possible that Cis was lying about both, which makes even more sense in lieu of his actions. You don't censor people you like and agree with, and you don't sperg out like he did if you like the people and forum you're a part of. We've all seen countless examples of globalist infiltrators and useful idiots admitting, explicitly or implicitly, that they hate the very spheres they infiltrate and the people in them. This hatred always comes out when the users say anything contrarian to the current message. The farther a comment, post, or discussion is away from the current message, the more vociferous and obvious the hatred shines through. The most extreme hatred comes with the discussion of the 3 most verboten topics: race realism, jews, and accurate WW2 history. That's why these 3 topics are the greatest challenge and indicator to anyone or anything claiming to be for free speech.
The left: everything we want is a human right, enforceable by the government and globalist apparatus.
The right: everything we want is "hate", and is punishable by the government and globalist apparatus.
Man, what a coincidence.
Can confirm. Indie developers are where gaming is now. I hope the same happens to Hollywood, but that medium seems much more difficult to produce.
None of the money they used to buy out entire sectors was earned fairly, either. They've taken over entire systems through corruption, lies, manipulations, and all other manner of crime. They're not punished for it, either, because they're in charge of most governments and both false choice political parties.
I just checked, because I was curious. Some of the largest shareholders of Activision Blizzard are Blackrock and Vanguard. This is clearly ESG woke bullshit.
Blackrock and Vanguard buy large percentages of shareholder stocks of most large companies, and then force those companies to push the woke crap. That's why we're seeing such a drastic uptick in all of this lately, because this is a relatively new phenomenon, at least through this specific tactic.
If you ever see a company pushing woke stuff, just do a quick internet search for who their primary shareholders are. Here are the primary shareholders for Activision Blizzard:
girls in this video
courtiers
Fucking LOL.
I also think it's hubris on their part. They're liars and defiant of God, thinking they know better, doing the antithesis of everything that's true and good. It ultimately means everything they do fails. Since they're weak and work through subversion, it takes time to thoroughly corrupt a good people and nation, so the poisonous fruits of their labors takes time to see in totality. We're in the later stages of seeing their fruits, so their lies are becoming more noticeable, as the results of their world degrade and accelerate toward collapse, destruction, and discomfort.
Also keep in mind that they want to get us from point A to Z (the naked truth of their evil), but can't jump to the end because they know people would immediately rebel and kill them, so they slowly move us from point A to B, B to C, and so on, slowly boiling us alive. However, truth is absolute, not relative. The further they push toward their end goal, the more people will notice and rebel. This is why a lot of normie right wingers are waking up and becoming more antagonistic against the globalists (whether they fully realize who they truly are or not), because of their ingress to sexualizing children.
We're not at the end stages of what they want, either. They're going to keep pushing. They might back off in an attempt to quell increasing dissent, but they won't stop. They won't stop until it's literally hell on earth. However, society will collapse well before then. Society only maintains itself on a foundation of truth. The more truth is abandoned, the more lies are accepted, the faster it will accelerate toward collapse, take away comfort, wake more people up to the truth, and increase dissent.
In every conceivable way we're headed toward a nexus. We're already past the inflection point. The genie is out of the bottle, and we're accelerating toward an inevitable conclusion. I know some of the black pilled here disagree, that "no one will ever do anything", but I thoroughly disagree. Civilizations always rise and fall. We're in the latter stages of falling. Collapse, violence, and misery are inevitable. It'll suck, but it's needed, as a means of atonement for our previous inaction, to weed out the evil, to reteach us past lessons we abandoned, and to cull the truly weak, to prepare for the beginning stages of the next civilization that rises from the ashes of the old. The only thing left to be decided is how we prepare, what lessons we'll carry over and teach to our children, in an attempt to lay a better foundation for the future, and what vestiges of grandeur of the past successes we'll protect and carry over, so we don't start from scratch.
How exactly the conflagration ignites, and how it burns, I'm not sure. I only know it will. Every measurable metric points in one direction. This is largely what my second book that I'm writing is about.
Is that not how we test and best learn about all things, to challenge it? Men, theories, science, structures, creations, sports, ideology,...
I know what you mean, but it won't start only when critical mass is hit, we'll see the effects gradually at first, and then it will rapidly accelerate toward collapse. If I had to guess, we're in the beginning stages of rapid acceleration. With how high Western cvilization has gotten, we're going to see a meteoric crash, especially when the mostly White boomer generation starts to retire and die off, being replaced by an ever increasing non-white population that can't maintain White systems and civilization.
I'll give her +1 point for knowing about pineal gland calcification.