YES. EXACTLY. Which is why it's important to introduce incremental service and self-reliance, rather than dropping the baby bird out of the nest all at once and expecting it to make a good run of it.
It's like those adults who sneer and scoff at kids in restaurants. They want them shuttered and instructed at home, to somehow learn how to behave in public, without ever actually practicing how to behave in public. That's weirdo thinking.
Which is what I think about "oh no no never have a teenager help with the family finances heavens no, they need that money to lift their honda civics with the undercarriage lights. They'll learn how to use a checkbook when they have to pay back a two-hundred-thousand-dollar loan for their black lesbian studies degree."
Could be! Though that sounds kind of like a faggot job, probably more desk-surfing, and I should hope not. Veterinary would be nice, there's a lot of need for that around here. Folks around here don't really expect to "get" a job, they mostly make them. If I get my way, we'll build them homes after we expand the property, which we can use some of the money saved from their teenager jobs for.
I understand you're being ironic. Do you find that fun?
It's sad that you think massive fragility and helplessness is a natural state of being.
I like to think of myself as "in my right mind," and you bet your ass that my kids are going to be giving back to the household in a few years as soon as they are able. I find it bizarre that this is somehow outrageous to you.
Where I live, kids are expected to help with the home work around or before age 10. Then chores, including outdoor work, including outdoor charity work for the neighbors and the elderly, around 10-12. As soon as they can find outside work, they do, and it would be retarded for a 14, 15, 16-year-old to have control over their own finances, or for all of their income to be their own, while all their food, health, education, and shelter is still being subsidized by mom and dad.
When they're old enough to start thinking about a car, they'll pay part or hopefully most of it, if not all. If they go to post-secondary, their expenses are their problem, minus whatever we've socked away in accounts for tuition (which they've contributed to).
This is not a quinceanera pretty prince-and-princess culture. We don't raise Little Lord Fauntelroys who go away to faggot college so they can live childless adult lives in a faraway City drinking craft IPAs and boba, eating bibimbap, sitting behind a desk sending emails to other indoor cats all their lives, thus ending family lines.
You, uh, think the Buckeys were slaughtering toddlers en masse in their grove-slash-underground bunker Baphomet shrine?
Ok.
You ever see the 1995 movie with Julianne Moore, Safe? At least half your posts remind me of that movie.
LOL Many such cases!
After left my school's magic scene with my war bride, similar events happened with several young ladies in the scene, and across numerous men. Some of them ended up together, married, sometimes the lady ended up with one dude, then another, then another. The guys are all "friends" and stayed that way, which I always found weird.
From what I can see, what's missing is blatant batshittery. I saw the "evidence" that's in the video, and it was bizarre Satanic Daycare nonsense that the investigators had dismissed as obvious mentally ill crankery.
It looks like the FBI or whoever had set up in call-in line to take accusations. Predictably, many, maybe most of what was gained was crazy people speaking Moon. The data included a column that gave the investigators assessment. I saw a lot of entries with "We investigated, and this claimant has been bouncing in and out of asylums her entire life."
Which really wasn't even needed to see it was crap. When you have "evidence" that includes basement child auctions, with Donald Trump and Elon Musk sticking their fingers in kids assholes in front of an audience to check for tightness, you can pretty damn safely toss that "evidence" in the trash.
Delusional leftist fucktoids were trotting this shit around as a smoking gun. What it actually demonstrated is how many of these people are retarded and credulous beyond description.
You don't want to be a freier, do you?
You know that's funny, I forgot that part: This'll be hard for young folks to understand, but MtG was a great way to find good pussy. Somebody went and grabbed a chick and said "You've got to come see what this guy is about to do--he's going to blow up the whole table at once." She did, I did, and now we've got kids.
The writing was on the wall. If you'd been playing a couple years at that point, and were smart, you could see where it was going. Then you had a choice: Keep investing in beanie babies with a pretty okay game behind it (that they were clearly going to fuck with, forever) or jump ship. I jumped, found other shit to do and other places to put my money.
Somewhere in a drawer in a bureau in a shed I've still got some old beta, unlimited, dark, arabian, legends, unlimited, and 3rd edition cards knocking around. Don't even care what they're worth, they're the kids' problem eventually. For my money you can tear up a Chaos Orb and sprinkle that shit over the whole goddamn company.
Pssh, you youngins.
The correct answer is Fallen Empires / Ice Age / Fourth Edition
Fallen Empires was all chaff, tedious and completely lackluster. FE teed-up the shit. Fourth Edition reprinted a lot of rare, valuable stuff with worse art, and faggoted the tap symbol for no fucking reason. This is when censorship rolled in as well.
Ice Age is when they knew they've got you, and screwed around with the rarities. Also it was clear that this was going forward as a milking operation.
This is all content complaints. A more adult answer would easily say 1999, when Wizards of the Coast got bought by Hasbro. This set the scene for future wokery. I can't exactly explain why, but WotC buying TSR in '97 also rankled. But to buy TSR and then get folded into fucking Hasbro a couple years later is something akin to a war crime.
Deutsches Filminstitut & Filmmuseum https://www.dff.film/en/
I'm taking several textbooks of nutrition and a couple semesters biochem, and yes, calling you dumb.
Would you prefer "very ignorant?" Would that help assuage your tender feelings better?
(P.S. still looking for a good home for that pancreas, since you claim not to need yours)
LOL fair enough. Too much chaff for too little wheat.
I heard you. Everyone heard you. You got downvoted for saying retarded things. You apparently haven't the faintest idea how any biochemistry works, no idea how hormones work, no idea how insulin works, no idea what's going on in the chemistry of the blood, completely ignorant of glandular function, and you're basically just dumb as shit.
Dumb and feisty is the worst combination.
Man I don't know what to tell you. I'm not new, I've been reading years of this community--since something like 2014 or 2015...whenever all the GG stuff hit reddit on KIA prime. I'm not saying this because I'm behind on the reading.
I simply disagree, strongly, with your analysis of intent. I doubt very much Imp has the social grace to be in any way any part of a "psyop." I watched him devolve over years, and nothing he ever did or said implied to me he was a part of anything grander than a single sick, sad person. This is clear from his nigh-total lack of engagement on the forums he's moderated. Tiny king of lonelytown; Friends: 1 (sometimes).
Anyways, not actually relevant here. "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" is only useful in limited circumstances to say that when caught in a lie, it can be safely assumed that nothing else the person says can be relied upon.
When the subject is saying true things, for instance, "Men get the short end of the stick in family court," that is a demonstrably, obviously true thing to say. Calling "Falsus in omnibus" when that's the context is just silly. And that's the kind of true thing that OP was clearly referring to. You want to "broken clock is right twice a day" this, that's the kind of aphorism I'm there for. "Falsus etc." no.
Sigh. No. You are talking weight management. Everyone here understands perfectly well you're talking about weight management. Everyone read it. Everyone understands it.
You are still wrong. Utterly, completely, ridiculously, enormously wrong. Everyone has very successfully read the enormously incorrect things you've said, processed them, and rebutted them.
Literally nobody has in any way said that you're talking about health outcomes. Everyone who has responded to you has done so sticking to the topic of weight loss.
You are correct about exactly one thing: This is a reading comprehension issue. You clearly can't fucking read.
This isn't a reading issue, you're simply massively incorrect, which several people have pointed out to you, and explained why.
Hey, can I have your pancreas? Since apparently you're not doing anything important with it.
LOL yeah that's exactly what I think when I see him post--someone who's totally on the ball and not the least bit deranged.
This is "hidden history?" I mean, those dirty Celestials were in Deadwood, fer crissakes.
That's for liars, not the mentally unwell.
Sources familiar with her thinking were overheard saying "ANDELE, ANDELE ARRIBA!"
This plan was better in Second Empire Victorian--most likely derived from a Type 7 or Type 9. I mean, the plan is identical, but the Victorian original didn't have those awful columns, and also had all sorts of delightful gingerbread (which is an utter nightmare to maintain). Lose the columns, make the roof Mansard, add some dormers and iron cresting, and then brother, you've got a beautiful house.
edit: Also, lose all those fucking railings. Those railings are for what--so the guy doing maintenance can climb out the window so he can...repair the railings?
Wait, he's supposedly using a parasitic infection clearing medication to treat a lymph disorder, and he's using this stuff on his face to do it?
I call shenanigans on this sir. Just tell us what kind of disgusting parasites you have crawling all over your face.