Yeah, dementia is one of the very few things I would never wish on anyone. It's a terrible fate.
Nah, it's a psyop. It's less about humiliation in Hollywood, and more about humiliating the public by having them go along with it and say it's actually completely normal and fine despite everyone knowing that's it's by definition abnormal and weird.
but it's not morally wrong
I consider cosmetic mutilation wrong. Nothing else needs to be said. That's all there is to it.
I seriously despise how circumcision is considered "normal". Outside of medical necessity, it shouldn't be done at all. It should be in the same category as any other cosmetic mutilation.
I think the funniest thing about it is that it's pretty easy to say that it's sleazy without it also being some grand immorality, because as OP said, adult women are perfectly capable of consenting.
But Feminists love ignoring the agency of women, and it's not limited to this either. Just look at how they react to women that say they want to be housewives and/or mothers.
I've never heard of Eliza Bleu, so Pool's effort has done more to make me aware of her, ergo make her more famous, than anything she'd done up until now.
Yes, but it's inevitable that easy catchall terms will be used. Woke. SJW/Social Justice. PC/Politically Correct. It's been going on for decades with very little difference between the terms.
It's a good thing you did since it has since been deleted.
german
Well, considering how you skirted the point, sounds like chances are you are not in fact Caucasian then.
As for my question being rude, I guess that was kind of the point? I certainly wasn't trying to stroke your ego considering I view idpol as some of the dumbest shit out there, regardless of whether it's demonising or idolising white people. Might as well be talking about astrology for how serious I'm gonna take it.
Considering you're probably not caucasian, it's certainly retarded at the very least.
This is one of the funniest parts about idpol crap from non-SJWs. You're all just as ignorant and stupid as those SJWs that lump everything together.
According to you, why is it caucasians specifically that are the descendants from angels? Why not the Normans? Or the Saxons? Or the Anglo-Saxons? Maybe the Slavs? Why caucasians specifically?
Because like SJWs, you all think it's interchangeable.
We are only allowed to say that all human beings descended from chimps and came out of Africa.
Just as retarded as the drivel you've spouted.
Palming the blame off to just neo-cons largely ignores the foundational issues with the party, and the two party system at large. Are there individual exceptions? Maybe, but I've found them to be irrelevant at best and shams at worst.
It's not something that can be fixed by "reforming" the party. You root out corruption, not foundational issues.
It should have been obvious decades ago. It was co-opted a looooong time ago, but most people bought (and still do buy) into the two party "conflict" and truly believe there are no other options.
It's because too many people believe that the enemy of their enemy is their friend, and that has never been the case.
The funny part about this is the idea that there's not force to try and get men to comply. There absolutely is. The difference is that, compared to women, most men are capable of not caring and doing their own shit anyway.
Which is funny, because even if there is "systemic racism", bitching about it won't actually change anything. The only way to beat such supposed systems is to actually beat it. Bitching about it, asking others to "dismantle" it won't do shit. Bettering yourself? That's how you beat it. It's not about "The Other Side™". It's about the person. The individual.
But that goes against collectivism, so Leftists (and let's be honest and not mince words, statists in general) hate such ideas because it's counterproductive to creating a class dependent upon them.
You're objectively a bad person for thinking unarmed men on the ground deserve to die because some cop wanted his power trip. Fuck cops, and fuck you.
Exactly my point. You cannot have generational wealth when you don't have stable families to pass wealth onto.
And there are theories out there that the government helped influence black culture to be this way (and I think there is some validity to that), but it doesn't change the fact that the solution isn't to simply give reparations or some shit like that, it's to put in the effort to counteract those internal cultural values. It starts with black dads actually being dads, and continues on with eliminating gang culture, drug dependency and removing/replacing the idolatry of being thugs (how much rap music is just idolising being a scummy person?). It starts from the inside, not from the outside.
The idea that "muh generational wealth" is god damn laughable when you compare different non-white demographics to each other. There's a reason black people are the poster child for poverty compared to latinos. And to an extent there are social factors, but it's almost all within minority cultures themselves. This bitch whines about "muh generational wealth" without even considering other cultures and their lack of fathers. That's why Asian's are rarely included in these discussions, because they disprove so much of this bullshit.
It's not racism, it's internal. And it's a damn tragedy, because it's cunts like this that help perpetuate such environments rather than rightfully exposing it for the harm it is.
She's worse than crab bucket mentality. She's outside the bucket and pushing any trying to escape back down. She's a part of the reason for these disparities.
And he deserved to die over that? Really? You're going to suggest he deserved to die because some agro cop felt threatened by a man on his knees?
The cops won't fuck you. They will shoot your dog and beat their wife though.
under which anyone who supports building roads "WANTS YOU SHOT".
Roads existed before the state came around to promise them (and then deliver some of the worst quality possible).
People care about their own lives, and their own lives are better with cops.
Nope.
And how much crime would there be with no cops?
Depends how you define crime, statist. But probably less considering speeding wouldn't be a crime anymore.
No cops is way worse though.
You admit that the system you shill for is for show and then immediately fall back on state programming. And you don't think you're licking the boot? You're outright shilling for cops under the admission that they're an illusion of safety.
Sucking off cops that execute a man on his knees doesn't make you a good person, it makes you a bootlicking faggot.
Do you think it'd be better without the cops though.
Yes.
"But what about-"
No, it's still not justified, it still won't be better. It's a lie sold to you that you need the police. The reality is that the police are incredibly inept. Violent and non-petty crime still goes on every single day, but their priorities are shit like parking violations and speeding tickets. They exist to create revenue and an illusion of safety.
There is no other way to prevent civil discourse other than threat of force.
AKA The Ends Justify The Means.
Less than 1% of interactions daily with United States Police Officers end in any form of violence.
Compliancy doesn't change the fact that all laws the police enforce are done through the implicit threat of force.
"The government investigated the government and found that the government did nothing wrong"
No way! I can't believe this is happening!
Seriously though, how many atrocities do states have to commit while justifying it in the moment and condemning it well after the fact with virtually nobody facing any repercussions and no meaningful changes be made before people will realise that the government can get away with just about anything and they know it?
There is no boiling of the frog anymore. The frog is boiled. Complacency is everywhere all because people aren't ready to risk the comforts they have become so accustomed to. We forgot what it's like to live for ourselves and not through the directives of another entity.