Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

48
McConnell announces that Senate will vote on Trump court pick (www.chron.com)
posted 5 years ago by AlwysHideUrPowerLevl 5 years ago by AlwysHideUrPowerLevl +48 / -0
35 comments share
35 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (35)
sorted by:
▲ 33 ▼
– Throwawaycuzmeh 33 points 5 years ago +33 / -0

100% the right play. Trump wasn’t elected president for 3 years and 9 months.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 21 points 5 years ago +21 / -0

If they did it they'd show a lot more of a spine than I'd expect from the republicans.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– TwelfthCycle 19 points 5 years ago +19 / -0

They're starting to realize that if they don't figure this shit out, they really will be up against the wall.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 17 points 5 years ago +17 / -0

I'll believe it when I see it. And a performative vote where they pick Romney to be the sacrificial "Principled One" to kill the vote so it doesn't happen before the election doesn't count.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SemperVenari 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Should be Barrett imo

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– christianknight 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

No. Barret is a wild card.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– TentElephant 16 points 5 years ago +16 / -0

The Turtle has spoken. If there is one man who can make it happen, it's cocaine Mitch. He lives to confirm judges.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 29 ▼
– stanzololthrowaway 29 points 5 years ago +29 / -0

Its not just that. He specifically warned the Dems in 2016 that this would happen when they changed the Senate rules to try and strong-arm Merrick Garland into the Supreme Court. He really needs to make good on that warning.

It came back to bite the Dems in the ass with Kavanaugh, and it really needs to bite them in the ass here.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– TentElephant 12 points 5 years ago +12 / -0

Stop, I can only get so erect.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– RoulerBleu 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Republicans, watching Democrats support violent criminals and rioters burning down the country.

Stop, I can only get so elect.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TentElephant 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

As taught in isolation and captivity training, take the small victories. You aren't going to kill my salt high.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Gizortnik 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

He's gonna need all of the coke after this one.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– xleb2 12 points 5 years ago +12 / -0

Can't turn this ship around fast enough for me. Monday will be fine.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– ramzaruglia 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0

Great Mitch, now nominate Amy Barret next week so we can get started.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– RoulerBleu 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0

Democrats were warned to not change the rules, but they wanted to rush their candidates, so they did.

Now they REEEE that Republicans will play by the rules Democrats set.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– RoulerBleu 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0

Hahahaha, this is going to drive Democrats absolutely insane.

They will be reeeing everywhere like headless chickens. Not just the little shits rioting in the streets for their martyr violent criminals, but the media establishment and the elected ones too.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Gizortnik 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

My problem is how many of them are declaring open war at this point.

This shit's gonna get fucking crazy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 27 ▼
– deleted 27 points 5 years ago +27 / -0
▲ 27 ▼
– AlwysHideUrPowerLevl [S] 27 points 5 years ago +27 / -0

All the rumors I've seen are suggesting that potential nominees will be women. Which on one hand I understand because of good optics, Ginsburg's feminist leanings and so on, but on the other hand choosing people based on gender is still sexism and more importantly is retarded.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 29 ▼
– MelisandeScott 29 points 5 years ago +29 / -0

good optics

That, and to avoid a bunch of made up rape allegations that stall proceedings, like what happened last time with Kavanaugh.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– TentElephant 19 points 5 years ago +19 / -0

They'll say she setup the girls for Kav's gang rapes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– stanzololthrowaway 25 points 5 years ago +25 / -0

I think Amy Coney Barrett is an excellent pick not because of her gender but because she worked under and was mentored by Scalia, is very against Roe v. Wade and Obamacare, and is pro-2nd Amendment, and from the opinions if seen her write, she is pretty anti-immigration too.

She's only in her late 40's, so she also has plenty of years left.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– TentElephant 17 points 5 years ago +17 / -0

Her name is Barrett. She has to like smacking down gun grabbers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– ajfofjakf 14 points 5 years ago +14 / -0

.50 cal Supreme Court justice, know what I'm saying?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– christianknight 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Where do you see she is pro 2nd?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– stanzololthrowaway 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

Here. Starts on page 27.

Massive tl;dr:

Barrett argues in a dissenting opinion for the right of nonviolent felons (in this case, a guy who was convicted of felony mail fraud) to possess firearms.

As a side note, I honestly can't believe that falsely selling therapeutic shoe inserts as "Medicare approved" and then billing Medicare accordingly actually counts as a felony. Fucking clown world.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– christianknight 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

I saw, the question can she be counted on to rule against the NFA.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– stanzololthrowaway 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Who knows, its the only opinion she's written regarding the 2nd Amendment I could find. Still, arguing for the ability of nonviolent felons to possess firearms is pretty radical, its not even something Scalia would argue, at least that I'm aware of. Don't quote me on that, though. Scalia has authored WAY too many opinions for me to go through all of them and look for that kind of thing.

EDIT: Also something I was unaware of till now, both the majority opinion judges on that case were Reagan-era appointments. Fucking digraceful.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– christianknight 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Reagan is very suspect to me these days. Just about everything he did policy wise has benefited the swamp.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Piroko 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

The consensus seems to be that he's going to pick Amy Barrett. Supposedly she was one of the three finalists last time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– cfl1 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Picking Gorsuch over Barrett last time was the big mistake.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 5 years ago +11 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– AlwysHideUrPowerLevl [S] 12 points 5 years ago +12 / -0

An understandable reaction

permalink parent save report block reply
View 1 more comment

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy