A recurring theme I see with pedo's is that they all seem to lean hard left, and now with Netflix coming out with that disgusting "Cuties" poster its obvious that this sentiment is now being pushed into mainstream media.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
What's the uncharitable explanation?
See: Simone de Beauvoir
Jean-Paul Sartre
Michel Foucault
Allen Ginsburg
A bunch of others I don't freaking remember where I saw it, maybe oldkia2, but there was a shitton of leftist figures on a list of people related to pedophilia and pedophilic groups. It was pretty surprising.
edit: If anyone has that list please drop it down in the chat, that stuff's worth saving for future reference.
Frits Bernard
Edward Brongersma
Judith Butler
Jacques Derrida
Harry Hay
Guy Hocquenghem
Alfred Kinsey
John Money
David L. Riegel
Gayle Rubin
David Thorstad
All leftist philosophers, politicians, academics, doctors, authors, "gender/queer theorists" and/or activists who were either explicitly pro-pedophilia, tried to make a distinction between "affectional pedophilia" and "sadistic pedophilia" (essentially arguing that non-violent pedophilia is acceptable because the children consented and were focused on love not sex), or at the very least refused to distance themselves from pedophile activists.
You might be referring to the 1977 French petition against age of consent laws. All big French philosophers (specifically key postmodern players, the grandparents of the socjus movement) signed it.
Arthur C. Clarke, possibly. Not only into polygamy, but also repeatedly endorsed uplifting other species just far enough to make them better slaves. Should be fun to see that gardening, babysitting Utahraptor slave in the 3001 mini-series I heard they're making. Total slimeball.
Like Michael Jackson, fled to a Muslim country that fit better with his grossness.
Goddammit. Apparently this is a bit of what he had to say on kids.
This isn't some news site but rather one for people that left the Children of God cult. That's a cult with a decades-long history of kid fucking so I think we can give it credence
I hope Robert A. Heinlein isn't one too. He was another sci-fi writer with a rather "bohemian" view of sex.
Fucking hell. We're talking single digits, aren't we? It's got to be something appalling if he doesn't even dare speak it in Sri Lanka
He is definitely right about this to some extent, but the fact that he seems to have made major life decisions that put him in a better position to fuck young boys tells me he was extremely predatory.
"have your kid suck my dick you bigot!"
... and they think it's funny.
Unless you're a lonely male virgin past a certain age that just wants comics and video games to feature hot girls with big tits.
The real probably is that gratuitous promiscuity featuring hot adult females is NOT celebrated by rather reviled
Because pedo's are actively campaigning to be known as an orientation in the gender alphabet groups, instead of as degenerate scumbags who fiddle with kids, and the left is where they can accomplish that goal and normalize it.
What's the difference.gif
"Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation."
"It is not necessary to figure parent-child incest as a unilateral impingement on the child by the parent, since whatever impingement takes place will also be registered within the sphere of fantasy. In fact, to understand the violation that incest can be and also to distinguish between those occasions of incest that are violation and those that are not it is unnecessary to figure the body of the child exclusively as a surface imposed upon from the outside... The reification of the child’s body as passive surface would thus constitute, at a theoretical level, a further deprivation of the child: the deprivation of psychic life."
"But, after all, listening to a child, hearing him speak, hearing him explain what his relations actually were with someone, adult or not, provided one listens with enough sympathy, must allow one to establish more or less what degree of violence if any was used or what degree of consent was given. And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable."
u/TentElephant , he's stealing your quote!
Shh...
Anyway, here's another one I don't recall TentElephant posting:
While today the very possibility of consent before puberty is polemic – often raising emotional responses and leaving intellectuals in a defensive position, in 1977–1978 Foucault, Hocquenghem and Danet admitted openly and with naturalness the idea of a non-abusive pedophilia. The 1977 petition refers to all ages below the age of consent in France (fifteen), including the ages before puberty.
Both Foucault and Hocquenghem agreed that consent is a contractual notion. "This notion of consent is a trap, in any case. What is sure is that the legal form of an intersexual consent is nonsense. No one signs a contract before making love", said Hocquenghem.
"When we say that children are 'consenting' in these cases, all we intend to say is this: in any case, there was no violence, or organized manipulation in order to wrench out of them affective or erotic relations", he completed.
The Hocquenghem quote is a good one. I'm stealing it. There are a bunch of other fun names on that petition to rape infants: Derrida, de Beauvoir, Sartre, etc.
So much cultural appropriation in this thread, I can't even.
Not to split hairs, but did the petition mention infants?
It doesn't explicitly mention infants. It is implied by the complete abolishment of age of consent.
The more the merrier. I don't have copyright on it or even like the concept. Go forth and spread the actual words of globohomo's prophets.
Camille Paglia's another one. Really hated learning this because she seemed like one of the more sensible feminists.
Excerpt from her book, Sexual Personae
I'm also seeing she has/had a webpage devoted to her on NAMBLA's website but I don't feel comfortable checking that out on a work computer xD
Dammit, her quote about mud huts and the patriarchy was great but she had to say some gay shit like this.
Right? I learned about her right around the time I was discovering Christina Hoff Sommers (as far as I know, still isn't a pedo apologist, thank god) and Jordan Peterson. Seeing Paglia speak was really eye-opening, especially when she was speaking up about how men were being left behind, so I was really bummed to learn she was pro-child rape.
I'm stealing this one too.
You know how these people go after drawings of Japanese characters that so much as appear to have a flat chest? The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
Can't have the people who might actually go diddle a kid have a safe way to satisfy those urges.
To be frank there is no reason for a girl to have a flat chest, much less a drawing
What the hell is this shit lol
Flat girls need the D, too. They just gotta be not, you know, children.
They can upgrade their tits
Bio-leninism.
The more disgusting and reprehensible the identity a person has, the more likely they will be elevated to a position of influence where they will be taking orders.
Why?
Because it guarantees loyalty. If a pedo in position of power disobeys, then he will be instantly kicked out back to where he was picked up. Now the pedo is back being a pleb, has no party protection and is hated for what he did when he was serving the party.
That's why the pedo will obey.
I'll be cancelled I'm sure but pedo shit runs deep in the gay community. Actually talk to gay folks and a disturbing amount of them had sex with an adult while still a minor.
Don't need to think too hard to see how pushing that harder and harder and harder will result in regular pedos coming further forward.
Are we still doing "phrasing"?
There is no difference between pedo and homo in my mind
How do you think they became gay?
The left wants complete control. If they can have control of a person's upbringing, desires, body, etc., and corrupt those who should be off limits, then that would be ideal for them.
You can see this is everything they do. Double standards are meant to control what you do and allow them to do as they wish. Censorship is control. Making children do and say what they want is a high for them. Doing something to them that should never be allowed while we are unable to stop it is their ultimate high.
Whoever has Epstein's big book of blackmail now can't use it if pedophilia is accepted.
That's a Babylon Bee article, no joke
Oh, that goes way back. The pedos and LGBT used to be explictely allied, but they kicked them out because of the optics. But remnants of this still remain, particularly in continental Europe.
Easter Europe is a bit behind on that. They are most likely to kill a pedo if it is found it and then worry about any implications with the law.
Simple, because the democrat party for example has a long, long history of dehumanizing people. I mean they had no problem with slavery, founded the KKK, even in 1964 were still saying that black Americans do not deserve civil rights. That sort of evil, that has existed for so long, does not just disappear. The sort of scumbags that can look at their fellow man and see nothing more than something to exploit, of course they are gonna look at kids the same way.
This is why, even though I am not at all religious, I have come to believe that virtues like compassion, empathy, seeing each other as equals, believing that everyone has the right to their own opinion and the right to speak said opinion, the right to defend themselves, all come from our Judaeo-Christian society. I don't like the church but its pretty obvious that when left to our own devices, people are not inherently good, we are selfish fucking monsters.
The democrats, having never seen other people as real people and having no values see nothing wrong with rape, murder, slavery etc. They are a bunch of tribal scumbags who legitimately think they are better than everyone else, they think they are the elites of the world, and once you get in that mindset, who cares what happens to some lower caste brat.
And it has been this way all through our history, sure its still blatantly obvious in societies like the Chinese, India, Islamic countries, even Jewish communities hence the whole Nazi counter. But it goes right back with even the Romans having no problem abusing lower caste slaves.
TLDR: Judaeo-Christian values taught us better, the left are godless sons of whores who think they are better than everyone so see no problem with sating their desires with kids.
EXCUSE ME, that phrasing is completely non-inclusive of this victimized group. The correct terminology is "minor attracted persons".
No, really, what some others have said and also it seems like a bunch of them have become entrenched in academia, and you know how that type of venom spreads over time.
Hashtag MAPPride! (Posts selfie.)
(Actually I support them posting pictures of themselves on Twitter. Good to know who to avoid.)
https://youtu.be/EmroKlAJMsM Video on bioleninism talks about how communist look for the worst of the worst to get followers, pedos included.
Pedos are doubleplus good because it doubles as blackmail.
Well, not once its "normalized". I mean, homosexuality used to be a blackmail-worthy thing. Now? Not so hot on the market, is it? Even adultery still gets more mileage on the highway of shame ...
Gays are the straight white males of the alphabet people now. Pedos will eventually become the oppressor of the drukhari.
I give it 50/50 odds that if the left got absolute power they would stop pretending to care about pedos and most of the lgbt stuff and put them against the wall like they tend to do.
50/50? You're more charitable to the commies than I.
The very first thing they do after a successful revolution is to mass-murder the undesirables who helped put them in power.
Communist countries don't have hypernormalization of sexual deviancy. It's not hard to figure out why.
What better way to draw the freaks out into daylight, than with kindness and tolerance? Then, BLAM! Just like bait.
This theory (I say this because I am not a scientist.... but I am not dumb) doesn't require me to point out political affiliation however for obv reasons that it mostly separates. I cant remember if I heard Jordan Peterson say this but it makes sense. Around 45% of people tend to be conservative, 45% liberal and 10% in the middle. Our upbringing will determine where we start however the tendency as we age is to get more conservative although social influence has a part to play....
For various reasons which JBP explains, in a stable society you need both sides however they have to come to the middle for progress (which is why dick gets done anymore in Washington).
The liberal side values free expression, and free thought and action, conservatives value rules law, order and personal responsibility. I think as time has progressed, the echo chambers of the internet have separated these two sides into echo chambers allowing the more radical elements on ether side to gain influence.... with that being said, the conservative elements are less involved in tech and are slower to change which is why this radicalization is less pronounced.... also conservatives had more radicals in this country then today(atleast in my view) 25-40 years ago, pre-internet boom and pre-media subversion. Basically everything has shifted liberal.
What happens with the liberal in their echo-chamber is that they become more and more degenerate... they put less and less emphasis on personal responsibility and more onto a collective thing (more government for example) but to the topic at hand that includes drugs and sex.... the more and more drugs you consume, the more you have to consume to yield the same effect.... same with porn and sex (once someone is exposed to enough porn).... the reason it works is novelty.... but as you progress, the soft stuff is no longer enjoyable. Everyone starts with soft-core and basic genres but you need more and more stimulation so it ends to into rape fantasies, cuckoldry, incest, trannies.... then children....
If there were a mix of different types of people in a group, things balance themselves out and you would never see such degeneracy, however with the advent of social media, you are separated into your own peer groups, and with the case on the left, actively suppressing the right... so you have more people supporting each-others twisted thinking, like being okay with 11 year olds striping and doing sexual acts, and it being okay, or that queer thinking is not only not a disorder, that it is somehow superior....
I know these things because I was once addicted to drugs, porn, atheism and the whole liberal mindset in general.... but thankfully I was an independent thinker and had very few friends so when my life started to turn to shit, I had to search for answers on my own which is how I find myself now more on the right.... Some people are too over-socialized and cant escape which is why we have so many trannies and pedos now adays.
What you're talking about is basic lack of self-control/self-discipline, and the lack of desire to develop it.
Yes, people can do certain things in moderation, but the most vocal ones are the ones who cannot control themselves, and don't want to admit they're such "animals" in that regard ("people" exercise self control, and can enjoy things in moderation. Right? Right.) Not everyone who drinks beer becomes an Everclear-guzzling alcoholic.
And yes, in a properly functioning society, the ones with no self-control are mitigated and subsumed by the larger, better-disciplined majority. BUT the marxist crowd has lionized this element of humanity (just like it elevates all the rest of the Darwinian behavioural dross that would normally be selected out at best, and a small but persistent part of the population at worst. They want to put these in charge. And yeah, the merchant class is full of this thinking, with their "constant sustainable human population growth" myth - they can't be happy with enough, they always need "more", and define "more" in the way Earl Sinclair does. Anyway, look at how one of the first things they went after was childhood discipline. And mandatory military service. Someone told me Army Cadets got pussified, too (in the 80s, they trained us on two different types of firearms, live ammo.)
Enough with the anti-porn crap in this sub, this shit is so dumb
Maybe YOU don't have a problem (doubt that) however it is a serious drug and as addicting any other and I believe it is the one of the top social issues of today....especially for men, because how of ubiquitous it is... I am not saying ban it (because prohibition causes its own problems) however it effects ones entire behavior greatly.
Try going without porn and jerking off for a month.... First off It I promise you the first 2 weeks will be the most difficult thing you will ever face short of being homeless or in a coma or some shit like that.... Ive been addicted to opiates, stimulants, alcohol.... way harder to get off porn.... in large part because of the justification. if you are successful, you will understand the weakened state it puts someone in. I spent 17 years of my life jerking off to porn every day, thought it was normal, acceptable and healthy.... "O its good for your prostate" BULLSHIT
That isn't even considering the moral hazard of knowing some of the girls you jerked off to were not willing participants... happens more than you know.
I know these words wont convince you of shit because I cant help someone who doesn't wish to help themselves, but understand it is not a healthy behavior and it robs you of your mental, emotional and even physical capacities.
Because leftists are by definition shitty people
it all started with gay rights, a dlippery slope of one degeneracy to another