Thought experiment: if this was a left-wing judge complaining about threats, would we be saying that this is her 'admitting the effectiveness of right-wing terror'? Or that she is exploiting threats in order to play the victim and push her agenda?
"Leftists accuse Judge X of buckling under supposed right-wing threats - because these rulings were so obvious and common sense that she was on the side of the conservative judges" - I guess.
"As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." (Isaiah 3:12)
The administration did, the conservative movement did, because for all their talk about “knowing what a woman is” they don’t
I don't remember getting to vote in a supreme court justice. This person talks like it's all the people's fault that the administration did something stupid. When it happened there were a lot of people saying the same thing that ACB is saying right now. That she'd fold to the violence, that she'd use emotion, not the constitution to deliver verdicts.
At least Ketanji Jackson Brown is just fucking retarded and can't help being a fucking moron. Who also shouldn't be there, but for very different, but also similar reasons.
Oh yeah, that's not great. Although as bad takes go, being a Stephen Miller fan is borderline forgivable. He is the glaring exception proving the rule.
Hot take: if you haven't put your life on the line in service of your country, you shouldn't even be allowed into the bureaucracy.
This sounds like a recipe for absolutely minimal bureaucracy, so yeah go for it.
In Republican Rome, people would start wars in order to win the glory that came from putting their lives on the line 'in service of their country'.
Are the reasons that we start wars now any nobler?
Good.
or allowed to vote
Thought experiment: if this was a left-wing judge complaining about threats, would we be saying that this is her 'admitting the effectiveness of right-wing terror'? Or that she is exploiting threats in order to play the victim and push her agenda?
What are rightoid influencers saying in your scenario?
"Leftists accuse Judge X of buckling under supposed right-wing threats - because these rulings were so obvious and common sense that she was on the side of the conservative judges" - I guess.
That sounds pretty dumb so probably accurate.
Well, take solace in that you voted your conscious, right?
Or.. is something suddenly bothering you?
Is the purpose of the court to enforce bad laws or to be the last defense of the voice of the people?
Stupid whore knows better. Ate her cake. Now she wants to have it too.
I don't remember getting to vote in a supreme court justice. This person talks like it's all the people's fault that the administration did something stupid. When it happened there were a lot of people saying the same thing that ACB is saying right now. That she'd fold to the violence, that she'd use emotion, not the constitution to deliver verdicts.
At least Ketanji Jackson Brown is just fucking retarded and can't help being a fucking moron. Who also shouldn't be there, but for very different, but also similar reasons.
Has Auron had a bad take?
Yes
https://xcancel.com/AuronMacintyre/status/2008388103371673901
Oh yeah, that's not great. Although as bad takes go, being a Stephen Miller fan is borderline forgivable. He is the glaring exception proving the rule.
Auron also works for Glenn Beck. Slipping subversive Philosemitism in between "based" takes is his job.
He's done nothing significant. He just talks tough on Fox News.