None of the big names among the grifting online right wing influencers are leaders. But unlike Nick, Dan isn't running cover for Israel and isn't spouting anti-White shit and doesn't surround himself with grifting Jews. At least as far as I know. Haven't kept up with what Dan has been doing.
None of those were decentralised, they may have been compared to the aggressors but they were not decentralised resistance, they were highly organised and capable.
Vietnam was an actual country with a military.
Afghanistan was militia groups funded by outside entities. You have to actually have organised groups to supply and arm. Random goat herders pinging away at an APC with an AK 47 might exist, but they're just not going to do anything strategically.
Algeria - I don't actually know anything about this one
Chechnya - Chechnya is/was a breakaway region with it's own government in exile and highly organised around tribal/religion. They also don't really exist anymore because they lost.
Iraq - There were militia groups that were literally called armies.
Finland - I don't know how you call a states military fighting as a organised army decentralised or asymmetrical. Outnumbered and outgunned yes.
Guerrilla warfare, jungle terrain, and political mobilization defined Vietnamese asymmetric strategies against both France and the US.
The Viet Minh and later North Vietnamese Army (NVA) and Viet Cong used intricate tunnel networks like the Củ Chi tunnels, ambushes, and hit-and-run attacks to counter superior French and American firepower.
They avoided large-scale battles, instead focusing on prolonging the conflict to erode enemy political will.
Afghanistan: US and USSR
Decentralized command, terrain mastery, and foreign support enabled Afghan fighters to resist both superpowers.
Against the Soviet Union, mujahideen fighters with US support used mountainous terrain for cover, employed hit-and-run tactics, and received weapons via Pakistan-based sanctuaries.
Later, against the United States, groups like the Taliban and Al-Qaeda used similar methods, blending with civilians and using IEDs.
Algeria: France
Urban insurgency and international propaganda were key to Algerian asymmetric warfare.
The FLN (National Liberation Front) waged a campaign of bombings and assassinations in cities while leveraging global media and the UN to frame their struggle as a human rights and decolonization issue.
This political strategy helped win international sympathy and pressured France to withdraw.
Chechnya: USSR
Urban warfare and suicide attacks characterized Chechen resistance against Russian forces.
Though post-Soviet, the conflict began under the Russian Federation. Chechen fighters used guerrilla tactics in Grozny, turning cities into battlegrounds and using suicide bombings to maximize psychological impact.
Their goal was national independence, achieved temporarily through attrition.
Iraq: US
Insurgency, IEDs, and sectarian manipulation defined asymmetric strategies post-2003.
After the fall of Saddam Hussein, former regime elements and Al-Qaeda in Iraq used ambushes, car bombs, and improvised explosive devices to target US troops and Iraqi civilians.
They aimed to destabilize the new government and exhaust US public support.
Finland: USSR
Mobility, terrain, and scorched earth were Finnish asymmetric strategies in the Winter War.
Facing a much larger Soviet Red Army, Finnish troops used skis for rapid movement through forests and executed ambushes in the Karelian Isthmus.
They avoided direct confrontation, instead relying on delaying tactics and extreme cold to weaken Soviet forces.
In sum it seems the Maxwells did a number on you with their McGrawHill school books. Either that or you are a fucking zogbot. If the former read more. If the latter suck a bag of dicks LOL
Dan is a certified con artist and Nick is a fed. What's funny is that a close friend of my mine made a video about Blizerian and a bunch of bots accused him of working for Israel lmao
One thing I am not going to do is take the side of the guy who is on video saying he wants to be boots on the ground in Israel with a rifle shooting Jews.
He is too stupid to learn and incorporate the lessons of the Whitmer frame job, and the Jan 6 protesters. Never, EVER give the feds an excuse to come down on you like a ton of bricks.
Wanna know how the SPLC got so many paid informants in the WN movement?
THAT IS HOW.
Making stupid, low IQ mistakes that puts you in a position of having to take a deal where you inform on your friends to stay out of f***ing prison.
Never, EVER give the feds an excuse to come down on you like a ton of bricks.
They don't need one. Never did. They'll just invent one if they really want to get rid of you. Or frame you for some other unrelated stuff. The system doesn't protect you. The only thing that protects you to an extent is that they need to keep the illusion of democracy going.
A lot of Whites have a small amount of "jew" in them because all the spiritually good jews became Christian after Jesus and then gave up their "jewish" heritage while converting to Christianity and mingling with Whites.
Anyone who today can trace their lineage far enough back to determine they come from a jewish family is tied to the spiritually evil jews who never converted to Christianity after Jesus.
What if Dan Bilzerian is indeed 1/8th jew, and that totally explains his past materialistic hedonist lifestyle. He was behaving like a jew. But then he rejected that part of himself. Now he's a better man who names the jew, calls out pisserHell, and is simply a better option in this fake election.
I won't ever take the moral high ground on someone that was able to move past stuff like that. Because I wasn't perfect either and if I wasn't leading a life with some sin back then, I probably wouldn't be able to appreciate my position now.
Nick is still a fed. Not that I trust Dan in any way but he's far more trustworthy than that narcissistic faggot.
History shows that decentralized power structures and asymmetrical wars win every single time.
Fake leaders detract us from the only winning strategy we have.
Trust no one.
None of the big names among the grifting online right wing influencers are leaders. But unlike Nick, Dan isn't running cover for Israel and isn't spouting anti-White shit and doesn't surround himself with grifting Jews. At least as far as I know. Haven't kept up with what Dan has been doing.
Spic Fuentes wasn't running cover for israel until he was. These fucking fags follow the same script. Just give him time.
He just surrounds himself with anti everyone muslims and scams people out money
Name one.
Why just one when there are tens? I'll give you a few:
Vietnam: US and France
Afghanistan: US and USSR
Algeria: France
Chechnya: USSR
Iraq: US
Finland: USSR
None of those were decentralised, they may have been compared to the aggressors but they were not decentralised resistance, they were highly organised and capable.
Vietnam was an actual country with a military.
Afghanistan was militia groups funded by outside entities. You have to actually have organised groups to supply and arm. Random goat herders pinging away at an APC with an AK 47 might exist, but they're just not going to do anything strategically.
Algeria - I don't actually know anything about this one
Chechnya - Chechnya is/was a breakaway region with it's own government in exile and highly organised around tribal/religion. They also don't really exist anymore because they lost.
Iraq - There were militia groups that were literally called armies.
Finland - I don't know how you call a states military fighting as a organised army decentralised or asymmetrical. Outnumbered and outgunned yes.
Vietnam: US and France
Guerrilla warfare, jungle terrain, and political mobilization defined Vietnamese asymmetric strategies against both France and the US.
The Viet Minh and later North Vietnamese Army (NVA) and Viet Cong used intricate tunnel networks like the Củ Chi tunnels, ambushes, and hit-and-run attacks to counter superior French and American firepower.
They avoided large-scale battles, instead focusing on prolonging the conflict to erode enemy political will.
Afghanistan: US and USSR
Decentralized command, terrain mastery, and foreign support enabled Afghan fighters to resist both superpowers.
Against the Soviet Union, mujahideen fighters with US support used mountainous terrain for cover, employed hit-and-run tactics, and received weapons via Pakistan-based sanctuaries.
Later, against the United States, groups like the Taliban and Al-Qaeda used similar methods, blending with civilians and using IEDs.
Algeria: France
Urban insurgency and international propaganda were key to Algerian asymmetric warfare.
The FLN (National Liberation Front) waged a campaign of bombings and assassinations in cities while leveraging global media and the UN to frame their struggle as a human rights and decolonization issue.
This political strategy helped win international sympathy and pressured France to withdraw.
Chechnya: USSR
Urban warfare and suicide attacks characterized Chechen resistance against Russian forces.
Though post-Soviet, the conflict began under the Russian Federation. Chechen fighters used guerrilla tactics in Grozny, turning cities into battlegrounds and using suicide bombings to maximize psychological impact.
Their goal was national independence, achieved temporarily through attrition.
Iraq: US
Insurgency, IEDs, and sectarian manipulation defined asymmetric strategies post-2003.
After the fall of Saddam Hussein, former regime elements and Al-Qaeda in Iraq used ambushes, car bombs, and improvised explosive devices to target US troops and Iraqi civilians.
They aimed to destabilize the new government and exhaust US public support.
Finland: USSR
Mobility, terrain, and scorched earth were Finnish asymmetric strategies in the Winter War.
Facing a much larger Soviet Red Army, Finnish troops used skis for rapid movement through forests and executed ambushes in the Karelian Isthmus.
They avoided direct confrontation, instead relying on delaying tactics and extreme cold to weaken Soviet forces.
In sum it seems the Maxwells did a number on you with their McGrawHill school books. Either that or you are a fucking zogbot. If the former read more. If the latter suck a bag of dicks LOL
I think we obviously have different ideas of what decentralised and asymetric refer too.
Dan is a certified con artist and Nick is a fed. What's funny is that a close friend of my mine made a video about Blizerian and a bunch of bots accused him of working for Israel lmao
0.1% doesn't disqualify you from participating, imo, but I would never take advice from someone with any Jewish blood.
correct answer 👆
Yeah l, Bobby Fischer anyone?
Your Jewish if your mother was Jewish. That's the rule they go by. Nothing else matters.
One thing I am not going to do is take the side of the guy who is on video saying he wants to be boots on the ground in Israel with a rifle shooting Jews.
He is too stupid to learn and incorporate the lessons of the Whitmer frame job, and the Jan 6 protesters. Never, EVER give the feds an excuse to come down on you like a ton of bricks.
Wanna know how the SPLC got so many paid informants in the WN movement?
THAT IS HOW.
Making stupid, low IQ mistakes that puts you in a position of having to take a deal where you inform on your friends to stay out of f***ing prison.
They don't need one. Never did. They'll just invent one if they really want to get rid of you. Or frame you for some other unrelated stuff. The system doesn't protect you. The only thing that protects you to an extent is that they need to keep the illusion of democracy going.
"There's ostriches on a farm nearby you,gotta suspend your rights."
They'll find the flimsiest excuses.
What is this post about?
Op being retarded but still overall correct
Correct about what?
Fuentes is a fed and none of these people are to be trusted
Is that a Dan Bilzerian quote?
"I'm a midget with a conman father and anm currently living off of the money he stole. I also like sucking cock."
-- Dan Bilzerian, allegedly
Don't care. Fuentes is still a fag
A lot of Whites have a small amount of "jew" in them because all the spiritually good jews became Christian after Jesus and then gave up their "jewish" heritage while converting to Christianity and mingling with Whites.
Anyone who today can trace their lineage far enough back to determine they come from a jewish family is tied to the spiritually evil jews who never converted to Christianity after Jesus.
And look at where we are now. I wish he didn't.
Irrelevant. Our problems today make Weimar Republic look like kids play.
I'm not your son fag.
What if Dan Bilzerian is indeed 1/8th jew, and that totally explains his past materialistic hedonist lifestyle. He was behaving like a jew. But then he rejected that part of himself. Now he's a better man who names the jew, calls out pisserHell, and is simply a better option in this fake election.
I won't ever take the moral high ground on someone that was able to move past stuff like that. Because I wasn't perfect either and if I wasn't leading a life with some sin back then, I probably wouldn't be able to appreciate my position now.
https://scored.co/p/1ASYz1ql0f/x/c/