For Trump alone, there have been 3 different incidents:
- Butler, Pennsylvania - 1 audience member killed, 2 others injured
- West Palm Beach, Florida - Traffic stop resulted in injuries to a 6-year old girl
- White House Correspondents Dinner
Charlie Kirk's killer was also not identified based on pre-trial facts regarding the weapon and force. There are also some who question the sincerity of his widow.
So, with that said, why did they stage the press dinner? Which, if any, of the other events were also false flags?
DNA1 is a fed. Next question: Why, and who else?
Why would a fed say something was staged?
the same reason the SPLC laundered money to the KKK and other "far right" demonstrations: controlled op.
What's being controlled?
Trump is the most MIGA president in the history of the U.S. according to himself, and certainly he is the most modern one as exhibited by the Iran war.
Democrats could not ask for a better lightning rod. Republicans will be slaughtered in the mid-terms especially as the economy continues to worsen.
Discrediting conspiracies? We have plenty of them that the feds don't like such as 9/11. They don't involve aliens.
Go fuck yourself.
Trump being simultaneously the best president we've had in 25 years and being a terrible MIGA stooge (like all the rest in since Bush sr) is beside the point.
The point is the attempts on his life are incredibly impractical and dangerous to fake.
*The SPLC bought off informants in pro-White groups for the purpose of destroying them.
that's their excuse, but it doesn't explain how these groups and rallies only ever pop up at the worst possible times. Looking at you Patriot Front (who was also funded by the splc)
I don't understand how saying that events are false flags is an automatic sign of controlled op.
The first Trump assassination attempt had bizarre coordination from the secret service along with footage of an agent directing camera crews where to stand to take a picture of Trump's injury, which resulted in a picturesque photo op for him. I remember it coming at a point in the campaign where many people were still hesitant to support Trump due to failure from the first presidency; that changed significantly after the assassination attempt. Remember that one of Trump's primary roles is to serve as an avatar of the modern right wing and to harmlessly vent nationalist frustration.
Likewise, support for Trump is critically low currently, so it is extremely suspicious that there is another "assassination attempt", especially one with the fake right wing icon Erika Kirk in attendance, who took over Turning Point after the successful, probably-real assassination of Charlie Kirk following his beginning to question Zionism and jews.
I don't think it serves (((feds))) at all for people to immediately call into question political theater.
citation needed
it serves them greatly when it shields their radicalized warriors. there have been attempts on right winger's lives throughout the entirety of the 2020s, not just on Trump. they want to make opposition feel scary, they want you to feel like you'll get gunned down by a random nobody because you don't go along with their agenda. they want their future gunman to feel emboldened to carry out the deed, and brushing off such blatant and obvious violence as a conspiracy theory is a great way to do that.
Because every fucking retard in the country is now claiming that nobody on the left wants them dead even as they kill them. The left on the other hand gets to say their violent rhetoric isn't a problem
It doesn't make sense that stating that an attempt on Zion Don is fake equivalent to stating that nobody on the left wants right wingers dead. Zionald isn't even right wing. I also don't think anybody except literally retarded zombie boomers and do-nothing normie faggots believes that the left doesn't hold violent hatred towards them.
Because more than anything they fear people figuring out that genuine assassinations can work. As long as every event is a false flag, or is staged, or is Mossad, then it allows people to believe the comforting lie that they cannot do anything. This leads to inaction which is the same as a win for the powers that be. On the other hand, if a series of successful assassinations were carried out in the US, no matter who was the target or the political affiliation of the perpetrator, then the myth of government protection gets broken. From that point on, real vigilante justice would become commonplace.
Lol, which one of these has "worked"?
Kirk? Where he was replaced be his neo-con, zionist, (potentially) child trafficker wife? Did that make things better for the Left.
Or are you just fed posting?
I guess you completely forgot how the feds got everyone believing that Israel killed Kirk.
Anyone that actually believes the bullshit about Erika Kirk is retarded
Have you every played a video game where there are ranges greater than 30 feet?
You don't have to be close to the asshole that needs killing. You don't even have to be in line of sight in the modern world.
You're questioning the pre-established premise, now.
Not sure about that, but there is definitely a lot of flak in this thread...