I HATE knowing too much...
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
AI finally is at a point where the trailers are starting to look like trailers for actual movies:
https://youtu.be/2hXugZQ1pZE
https://youtu.be/idlG1AzBhbI
I'm looking forward to proper movies being made in the next two years only using AI.
Unless you have a very loose definition of "proper movie" it's never going to happen.
AI can't create. It can only copy and rehash what its been fed. No amount of prompts can change that.
To be fair, at this point Hollywood is also incapable of anything other than copying and rehashing what it's been fed. All we're getting is meaningless slop either way.
Which is why I don't get why people want slop that looks even worse than Hollywood slop. The correct response to declining quality should be demanding better quality. To raise ones standards not to lower them even further.
Read your comment repeatedly and see if you can spot the flaw in your logic.
There is no flaw. To copy and only rehash existing content is not creation. It sure as hell isn't creativity. What we call AI isn't actually intelligent. It's not capable of creativity or originality. So called AI 'artists' don't create anything. They tell a tool to copy and rehash the content it's been fed with. They literally don't do shit. They don't even cut up pictures to arrange them in a new way.
"AI" is like "photoshop".
Photoshop isn't going to make images. It isn't going to create anything. It's a tool, used by skilled or unskilled people far more efficiently than editing on paper with white out and paints.
AI is the new brush and paint, not the painting. It's a new tool in the creative process. It isn't creative, those who use it are. Thog smash rock make new shape rock. Thog use hands to smash rock. Grog have rock-smasher hammer, rock-smasher hammer lose hand impact on rock smashing, no more original smashed rock sculptures. Statues no longer exist because Grog smash rock with hammer instead of hand.
Hollywood is no longer creating, it's only copying and rehashing and niggerfying classic films. I don't see how AI is worse in this regard?
Proper artists, writers, and narrative directors who collaborate can make some pretty impressive stuff using AI. Even single artists can use narrative and visual outlines to create awesome original stories based on real-life events, like Psyop Anime:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OS19oNHNnJs
In two years, channels like that will have OVA-length anime episodes, which will surely be better than any of the wokeslop coming out of Hollywood.
EDIT: Also, yes, people can create using existing design tools and improve/upgrade/modify it using AI. So you can create a 3D film and make it look live-action thanks to AI, using completely original scripts, visuals, and settings:
https://youtu.be/KgV-uuURMMg?t=37
Because it looks like shit. The trailers you've posted look like typical Hollywood slop only shittified even further. Also at least humans create Hollywood slop. That alone makes it better.
Write a book if you're too lazy to learn to draw and animate. The original One Punch Man webcomic has 'bad' art but looks infinitely better than any AI slop. You know why? Because it has soul. Because it was created by human hands. That's the reason why it got so popular in the first place.
That looks absolutely awful. Using NVIDIAs generative AI slop as a positive example is the worst thing you can do.
Frame generation in games is also 100% negative no matter how impressive it might be at some level. It looks like shit, it feels like shit and it gives developers the excuse of being lazy cunts and delivering products with godawful performance.
...Still not seeing how that's different from Hollywood.
One is shit and the other is recycled shit that somehow was made even worse.
I'm still waiting for someone to whitewash TV Sandman, still not gonna watch it, I just wanna smile as I reap the salt.
I would love to watch Tenet with Daniel Craig replacing David Washington.
With AI, I would love to see remakes set in different eras and shot differently with limitations of the era.
For Tenet I want 1980s Bruce Willis* as the protagonist, Val Kilmer as Neil, 90s Gary Oldman for the main bad guy, Michelle Pfeiffer for the chick, there's a better choice for the chick not Sharon Stone but I can't come up with the name, just a lingering blob in my mind.
With a heavy ass 80s synth soundtrack.
*I believe Willis could've pulled it off because of his work on The Jackal. Only other person I think would be a good fit was Baldwin, no one likes him here, but I bet he wishes he can invert a bullet or two these days.
I had never even thought of it like that, but you're right -- Willis also would have been good because of his work on 12 Monkeys; being driven but disoriented really helped ground that movie -- so you're right, he would have been a very interesting lead in a film like Tenet.
Val Kilmer as Neil would have been a nice fit, too.
What about Aaron Taylor Johnson's role? I thought he was the coolest character in the film. Jean Reno, perhaps?
Also, speaking of Baldwin -- I would pay someone to put him in Burton's 89 Batman.
Burton had considered him originally but then said he wasn't gruff enough, which seemed weird to me because Baldwin is WAY gruffer than Keaton. Burton liked Keaton's aloofness and the way he turned up his psychotic portrayal of Bruce for that scene with Nicholson and Basinger in the apartment. But I think Baldwin -- had he been given the chance to screen test that scene -- could have nailed it; he can definitely and easily play psychopaths, Malice and The Juror were good examples of it.