To be fair, at this point Hollywood is also incapable of anything other than copying and rehashing what it's been fed. All we're getting is meaningless slop either way.
Which is why I don't get why people want slop that looks even worse than Hollywood slop. The correct response to declining quality should be demanding better quality. To raise ones standards not to lower them even further.
There is no flaw. To copy and only rehash existing content is not creation. It sure as hell isn't creativity. What we call AI isn't actually intelligent. It's not capable of creativity or originality. So called AI 'artists' don't create anything. They tell a tool to copy and rehash the content it's been fed with. They literally don't do shit. They don't even cut up pictures to arrange them in a new way.
Photoshop isn't going to make images. It isn't going to create anything. It's a tool, used by skilled or unskilled people far more efficiently than editing on paper with white out and paints.
AI is the new brush and paint, not the painting. It's a new tool in the creative process. It isn't creative, those who use it are. Thog smash rock make new shape rock. Thog use hands to smash rock. Grog have rock-smasher hammer, rock-smasher hammer lose hand impact on rock smashing, no more original smashed rock sculptures. Statues no longer exist because Grog smash rock with hammer instead of hand.
Photoshop isn't going to make images. It isn't going to create anything.
And 'generative AI' is literally doing that. So AI is not like photoshop. Writing the prompt 'big tiddy goth gf' and AI shitting out an uncanny valley image straight out of a nightmare is not the same as drawing a big tiddy goth gf.
The only valid use generative AI has in the creative process is as a placeholder. For example in game development. For that use you can use it as a tool. For anything else it isn't a tool anymore just as microwaving a canned soup isn't actually cooking.
Hollywood is no longer creating, it's only copying and rehashing and niggerfying classic films. I don't see how AI is worse in this regard?
Proper artists, writers, and narrative directors who collaborate can make some pretty impressive stuff using AI. Even single artists can use narrative and visual outlines to create awesome original stories based on real-life events, like Psyop Anime:
In two years, channels like that will have OVA-length anime episodes, which will surely be better than any of the wokeslop coming out of Hollywood.
EDIT: Also, yes, people can create using existing design tools and improve/upgrade/modify it using AI. So you can create a 3D film and make it look live-action thanks to AI, using completely original scripts, visuals, and settings:
Because it looks like shit. The trailers you've posted look like typical Hollywood slop only shittified even further. Also at least humans create Hollywood slop. That alone makes it better.
Even single artists can use narrative and visual outlines to create awesome original stories based on real-life events, like Psyop Anime:
Write a book if you're too lazy to learn to draw and animate. The original One Punch Man webcomic has 'bad' art but looks infinitely better than any AI slop. You know why? Because it has soul. Because it was created by human hands. That's the reason why it got so popular in the first place.
That looks absolutely awful. Using NVIDIAs generative AI slop as a positive example is the worst thing you can do.
Frame generation in games is also 100% negative no matter how impressive it might be at some level. It looks like shit, it feels like shit and it gives developers the excuse of being lazy cunts and delivering products with godawful performance.
Unless you have a very loose definition of "proper movie" it's never going to happen.
AI can't create. It can only copy and rehash what its been fed. No amount of prompts can change that.
To be fair, at this point Hollywood is also incapable of anything other than copying and rehashing what it's been fed. All we're getting is meaningless slop either way.
Which is why I don't get why people want slop that looks even worse than Hollywood slop. The correct response to declining quality should be demanding better quality. To raise ones standards not to lower them even further.
Read your comment repeatedly and see if you can spot the flaw in your logic.
There is no flaw. To copy and only rehash existing content is not creation. It sure as hell isn't creativity. What we call AI isn't actually intelligent. It's not capable of creativity or originality. So called AI 'artists' don't create anything. They tell a tool to copy and rehash the content it's been fed with. They literally don't do shit. They don't even cut up pictures to arrange them in a new way.
"AI" is like "photoshop".
Photoshop isn't going to make images. It isn't going to create anything. It's a tool, used by skilled or unskilled people far more efficiently than editing on paper with white out and paints.
AI is the new brush and paint, not the painting. It's a new tool in the creative process. It isn't creative, those who use it are. Thog smash rock make new shape rock. Thog use hands to smash rock. Grog have rock-smasher hammer, rock-smasher hammer lose hand impact on rock smashing, no more original smashed rock sculptures. Statues no longer exist because Grog smash rock with hammer instead of hand.
And 'generative AI' is literally doing that. So AI is not like photoshop. Writing the prompt 'big tiddy goth gf' and AI shitting out an uncanny valley image straight out of a nightmare is not the same as drawing a big tiddy goth gf.
The only valid use generative AI has in the creative process is as a placeholder. For example in game development. For that use you can use it as a tool. For anything else it isn't a tool anymore just as microwaving a canned soup isn't actually cooking.
Hollywood is no longer creating, it's only copying and rehashing and niggerfying classic films. I don't see how AI is worse in this regard?
Proper artists, writers, and narrative directors who collaborate can make some pretty impressive stuff using AI. Even single artists can use narrative and visual outlines to create awesome original stories based on real-life events, like Psyop Anime:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OS19oNHNnJs
In two years, channels like that will have OVA-length anime episodes, which will surely be better than any of the wokeslop coming out of Hollywood.
EDIT: Also, yes, people can create using existing design tools and improve/upgrade/modify it using AI. So you can create a 3D film and make it look live-action thanks to AI, using completely original scripts, visuals, and settings:
https://youtu.be/KgV-uuURMMg?t=37
Because it looks like shit. The trailers you've posted look like typical Hollywood slop only shittified even further. Also at least humans create Hollywood slop. That alone makes it better.
Write a book if you're too lazy to learn to draw and animate. The original One Punch Man webcomic has 'bad' art but looks infinitely better than any AI slop. You know why? Because it has soul. Because it was created by human hands. That's the reason why it got so popular in the first place.
That looks absolutely awful. Using NVIDIAs generative AI slop as a positive example is the worst thing you can do.
Frame generation in games is also 100% negative no matter how impressive it might be at some level. It looks like shit, it feels like shit and it gives developers the excuse of being lazy cunts and delivering products with godawful performance.
...Still not seeing how that's different from Hollywood.
One is shit and the other is recycled shit that somehow was made even worse.