Reminder that we gave literal retards the ability to vote.
(web.archive.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
I don't understand why people who don't contribute to society and pay taxes can vote to steal resources from tax payers.
Without even getting into race or sex, if we just made it so you had to be a net positive tax-payer to vote most problems about voting would be solved.
I understand why.
That's what democracy is. It is nonsensical dysfunction. It is parasitism. It is destroying great nations as a sacrifice to the false god of equal.
But democracy doesn't need to be universal. I think the switch to universal was done on purpose because I think every major election that mattered for the last century has been rigged or influenced to get the desired result. Universal suffrage democracy gives the peasant class the illusion of power while making it easier for the ruling class to skirt accountability for their corruption and "mistakes" without the ruling class ever actually losing power.
Universal suffrage democracy is the most sinister form of government and the absolute worst of them all.
Show me a democracy that didn't succumb to universal suffrage or some other equally corrupt paradigm, because as far as I know no such thing exists.
The core idea of democracy is flawed and inevitably leads to the destructive end state.
Not in the modern jew-era but many non-universal suffrage democracies existed before that never succumbed to universal suffrage until the jew-era.
Greece, Iceland, Poland and Switzerland all had democracies at some point well before the 1700s that weren't universal suffrage.
Yeah, but that metric could be applied to any and all systems. They all have some level of vulnerability.
That isn't saying you're wrong, just that this argument isn't that great.
That’s what the word means now. Plato’s use of the term referred to a monoracial patriarchal timocracy—what the Founders created—and even in their time, ‘democracy’ had begun to mean ‘universal’ and so they explicitly made ‘democracy’ illegal and railed against it in their writings.
No shit; it was the fucking jews. That’s what communism is all about—the hoax of unquestioning egalitarianism.
Exactly, a constitutional democratic republic is the best political system to have because it's not about universal suffrage or "everyone gets treated fairly", but it's about representative regional governance and the prioritisation of local municipality (in theory).
The problem is that, like any system, it has been subverted via the long march over the course of a century.
It required a lot more effort and time to subvert than simply positioning a stooge in power in a typical monarchical system; but admittedly it's also next to nigh impossible to recover once it's been corrupted from the inside out. Hence, the only solution is to start over.
The only issue I see there is they would find some way to still drain money from you while not calling it a "tax" so that they could disenfranchise the middle class and concentrate even more power.
You're right. There are many hidden taxes that people pay. It's arguable that all employees pay corporate taxes because higher corporate taxes leads to lower wages. In economics, it's called tax incidence.
Race and sex are much better metrics to base voting suffrage on because they're much harder to fool yet correlate with exactly what we want.
Because then only white men would vote. And that’s evil because pile of shoes.
"Us" knowing better than "Them" is how the British nobility ruled over the US area.
Do you want a return to that or is it worth keeping as your own even if those lowly peasants get a vote too?
After all, you'll need cannon fodder to defend yourself :)