New owners of Tiktok
(twitter.com)
Comments (54)
sorted by:
Reminder: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protecting_Americans_from_Foreign_Adversary_Controlled_Applications_Act
Congress literally passed legislation to steal TikTok from the Chinese, and give it to the jews.
The only kind of legislation that seems to get bipartisan support every time...
Boy, I wonder who rules us...
Chyna and British royalty!
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/the-balfour-declaration-a-letter-from-the-united-kingdoms-news-photo/1035035964?adppopup=true
"Alec Trevelyan did nothing wrong."
Story of Christ in a nutshell. Comes out criticizing the jews, they go complain to the most powerful empire on earth to make the problem go away.
Surely this proves they don't own the media.
Also, and these idiots just can't see three steps ahead, people will just start using another word, they will cancel that word, and that will keep going until they just start using 'Jew'.
It's all so tedious and preventable.
Jew is the correct conclusion though so perhaps the jews are just helping people get to the right answer faster.
lolololol
Will only help redpill the normies, who are already primed to hate Isntrael
Wasn't free speech about being able to say bad things of the people in charge of the system?
It doesn't matter. Everyone knows the truth about the genocidal Israeli government. The genie is out of the bottle.
Ideologies have no rights. Socialists using jews as a skin-suit (Zionism), still have no right to this deflection.
You do nothing but run interference to prevent people from ever criticizing Jews. It's always Someone Else and not Jews with you.
Yeah but remember when he came back and he was TIRED OF THE LIES! He is totally on our side!
Yeah, when he came back from furlough after the government shutdown ended. Probably sitting at a desk in Elgin, going through his script.
We both know that's a lie. If you want to complain about jews, feel free to cite that video out of upstate New York. That is about Hassidic Judaism. It isn't about Zionism. Zionism is explicitly a Progressive Nationalist & Secular Ideology. It is fundamentally Leftist, and the first thing it did was use jews as a skin suit. The same way Feminists use women as a skin-suit, or the Labor movement use workers as a skin suit.
You're doing it again...while telling me that my assertion is a lie. You actively demonstrate the behavior while claiming that you don't do it. The brazenness is simply astounding. Is this what they call Chutzpah?
And my previous comment literally told you that you are free to criticize jews as a group and I gave you an example. That is why your assertion is a lie.
So we're only allowed to criticize Jews in the very narrow circumstances that you allow, almost as if it's some sort of containment operation. Sure, we're all free hate on some small town scamming welfare, but we damn well better not notice when Jews take control of a large propaganda platform and implement rules on it to ensure it can never be used to spread ideas that they don't pre-approve.
Disagree. My anti-AIPAC stance has been clear for years.
Someone who actually believed these things about Zionism would not be pro-Trump.
Trump is enacting pre-Progressive Era policies. I'm fine with that.
TRump would be a turbo socialist because of his Zionism, based on your interpretation.
Socialism for Israel. Better than Socialism for me.
Our tax dollars are funding it and even policing criticism of it in our own country.
In this view ideologies are phantoms that cross from the beyond and possess people lol. This is actually congruent with the existence of Satan, but you're an atheist.
I may be an atheist but I actually get what the Christians (and originally jews) are talking about.
First: ideologies are still metanarratives and world-views that inform morality; and as such they rival religions to some degree when not taken with the appropriate psychological boundaries that a reasonable person must establish when examining an idea set. If an ideology is unlimited in scope, and asserts a moral order, it is fundamentally indistinguishable from a religion, or more specifically: a cult.
Now, for a second, let's talk about Demonology! All of the named demons in the old testament are not really "demons" as we think of them. They are actually Babylonian gods that are rivals to Yaweh. In fact, the Jews are punished by Yaweh because some Jews are occasionally converted or swayed enough by the followers of these Babylonian gods, when they think Yaweh isn't doing enough for them, or isn't protecting them, etc.
The Old Testament basically slanders them as "demons", spiritual monsters meant to take you away from Yaweh and destroy your soul. HOWEVER THEY HAVE A GOOD POINT:
The followings of these polytheistic Babylonian Gods, are really just cults. In fact, most religions really seem like cults around this time. Even going back to the Assyrian Empire, that Empire was ruled by "The Cult of Ashur". Each God that existed in the Pantheon of the Assyrian religion was actually the god of a city. These city-state-gods were the physical manifestation of the metaphysics of the city (like the culture, aesthetics, attitudes, traditions, etc). These gods inhabited statues in the city center at the primary temple. In one instance, the Assyrians conquered a rival city-state, and then literally removed the statue of the rival god, put it on trial, convicted it, and threw it in a dungeon. They saw that their war was both physical and metaphysical; and the metaphysical gods could be treated physically if they lost to the superior god who won the conflict. It's crazy to think that the Assyrians literally put a god in prison, but that's actually how they saw it. The point is, each god has a literal cult-following.
The Babylonians gods are cults. In fact, each of them are condemned, because each of them try to use different mechanisms to try and recruit the jews. Ba'al is a warrior god with the power of lighting, and he is re-framed as a god of violence and murder. In 40k, you could think of him as Khorne. Asher is a god of fertility, but the cult would "worship" through ritualistic prostitution; re-framed as a false god using sex as a weapon. 40k would think of her as Slanesh. And why are the followers of Yaweh opposed to these gods? Because they will destroy your soul. Well, metaphysically, wouldn't it be true that an obsession with violence (the sin of wrath), or an obsession with sex (the sin of lust), be personally destructive to people who followed it. Wouldn't it cause them to hurt themselves in the long run? Absolutely.
So, if the Babylonian cult gods are re-framed as demons; falling under the power of Satan to tempt people from Yaweh... is there any difference from a modern cult that might still use the same tactics? A cult that tempts recruits with sexual availability is still similar to what the cult of Asher would do. And if Asher is a demon, than isn't this temptation to recruit people into this sin Demonic? If it's Demonic, is it not Satanic by virtue of being a larger effort to tempt people from God?
I think it's fair to say that all of this is logically true. So, from a purely metaphysical perspective, if an ideology were to have no boundary conditions and assert a moral framework, and it were to tempt people into opposing Christianity by recruiting them through the same methods that propped up Babylonian cults... is there any reason to not call it Demonic or Satanic?
How can there be any metaphysical difference between a Leftist who has been so conditioned by propaganda that he's screeching online that he's glad Charlie Kirk got shot in the throat and that more people should die; and saying that this person is possessed by the demonic spirit of Ba'al as an act of Satan?
I don't think there is.
It may not be literally true. It may not be materially true. But an ideology possessing someone like this, and a demon possessing someone like this isn't metaphysically different.
And why did the Babylonians predominantly worship Ba'al and the Jews predominantly worship Yahweh?
The Ugarits and Canaanites were Ba'als area. Babylonians chiefly Marduk and Ishtar.
As I understand, the Babylonians predominantly worshiped Bel and Nebo, not Ba'al. That was the Cannanites.
As for why Ba'al and not Yahweh was worshiped by the jews/isralites, that appears to be a difficult theological question that is well outside my knowledge. At the time when they were rival gods, Ba'al and Yahweh were both considered fairly similar, since both were warrior gods, and Ba'al was also a god of sea storms, and Yahweh was a god of thunderstorms.
I guess the way I would look at it is: which god actually helped devotees more? If it's true that Ba'al's rituals involved human sacrifice of children, where as Yahweh had sacrifice of some animals, that might be a good indicator of which cult would have had more pathological tendencies. The modern concept of God is that of a father figure. If any of that goes back to the original Yahweh that was competing with Ba'al, then you have two very similar gods, but one is a fatherly god, where the other sacrifices children. We only need to look around to see how pathological a fatherless society is. So, the society that will have better outcomes for it's people would be a society that worships a father figure, rather than one that demands child sacrifice.
Right, right
What do you want me to tell you? I don't know that level of detail for bronze age theological disputes in the levant.
You think there might be something to different ethnocultures having different religions?
You'll have to explain how it's "slandering" these lesser gods when the Israelites were told not to worship Ba'al and Moloch by sacrificing their newborn to them via fire?
What, pray-tell is the civilisational upside to sacrificing newborns in the fire to lesser gods?
You're misunderstanding me. "Slandering" as in: taking them from the concept of a different god, to a literal metaphysical monster. They aren't just neutrally stating: "here is this other god, and this is what it's rituals are like." They are engaging in an act of character assassination against the god.
And rightfully so, because the character of that god encouraged acts of evil and destabilisation of society.
Correct.
(((Larry Ellison))) of Oracle bought Tiktok and now has control over the algorithms, what is allowed to go viral, or its reach, and stores all the American data on US oracle servers.
With that, (((hey))) will be able to suppress the Palestine happenings, and will restart (((their))) Palestine genocide with Americans none the wiser. Get ready, goys.
I’m sure he wouldn’t cover up a genocide
<Checks notes>
Largest donor to the IDF?
yeah right?
And Netanyahu, used to live in his NYC house, or was that the former Isreal PM? Either way Ellison is a pureblood jew and his actions show it.
Chinese: obey
jews: hold my gay beer
I've never used that app. But, my son has to keep changing how he uses that app. Now he makes accounts, and deletes them because all his different topic accounts get pushed the same garbage he doesn't care about.