If you want to complain about college sports, you need to stick to any sport other than football. Football brings in way more money than it costs. The schools aren't paying anything for it. They are using the profits from it to bankroll the other sports that don't make money.
Traffic enforcement brings in more revenue than dealing with violent crime. That doesn't mean that the priority of a police force should be speeding tickets. Collegiate sports were created so students could engage in structured physical activity, not so universities could transition into event promoters.
They might as well start a college OnlyFans league. I'm sure they could bring in way more than they spend on it. They could start offering full scholarships for really nice tits. As long as it's cash positive, right?
And what? Claiming that colleges "allocate funding" to football is not true, period. That funding is only there because the football program brought it in to begin with. This fact has absolutely nothing to do with whether colleges should have sports teams. You are arguing a complete non sequitur.
You've mistakenly narrowed the scope of the topic. Your comment assumes that the reason allocating large amounts of funding to college sports is ridiculous because it's not profitable. That's not why. It's ridiculous because it shows where the college's priorities lie.
Saying, "Football brings in way more money than it costs," is the non-sequitur. That is irrelevant to why it's a problem. That's why I suggested a Division I Thot League. Would you agree it's an awful idea, even if it brings in more money than it costs? Or do you think it's a good allocation of college resources as long as it's financially self-supporting?
It surprised the hell out of me, but NCAA basketball makes well over a billion(1.38 billion) in TV ad sales just in the month of March. NCAA football apparently only brings in 1.1 billion in TV ad sales for the entire year, though it probably makes more in actual ticket sales since the outdoor stadiums are bigger.
If you want to complain about college sports, you need to stick to any sport other than football. Football brings in way more money than it costs. The schools aren't paying anything for it. They are using the profits from it to bankroll the other sports that don't make money.
Just because there's an economic case for it doesn't make it any less of a kabuki boomer goyslop embarrassment ritual.
That wasn't his argument though. He was simply against us funding it. But we aren't. It's funding itself.
Stop insulting Kabuki like that. We got Ganbare Goemon and Momotaro from it.
And?
Traffic enforcement brings in more revenue than dealing with violent crime. That doesn't mean that the priority of a police force should be speeding tickets. Collegiate sports were created so students could engage in structured physical activity, not so universities could transition into event promoters.
They might as well start a college OnlyFans league. I'm sure they could bring in way more than they spend on it. They could start offering full scholarships for really nice tits. As long as it's cash positive, right?
And what? Claiming that colleges "allocate funding" to football is not true, period. That funding is only there because the football program brought it in to begin with. This fact has absolutely nothing to do with whether colleges should have sports teams. You are arguing a complete non sequitur.
You've mistakenly narrowed the scope of the topic. Your comment assumes that the reason allocating large amounts of funding to college sports is ridiculous because it's not profitable. That's not why. It's ridiculous because it shows where the college's priorities lie.
Saying, "Football brings in way more money than it costs," is the non-sequitur. That is irrelevant to why it's a problem. That's why I suggested a Division I Thot League. Would you agree it's an awful idea, even if it brings in more money than it costs? Or do you think it's a good allocation of college resources as long as it's financially self-supporting?
Like how nearly all female sports programs are funded by male football. Occasionally by their basketball too.
That is entirely school dependent. The university I graduated from couldn't even fill the stadium on a homecoming game.
It's also not worth having the niggers roll though on finals week blasting their music so loud it rattles the desks.
It surprised the hell out of me, but NCAA basketball makes well over a billion(1.38 billion) in TV ad sales just in the month of March. NCAA football apparently only brings in 1.1 billion in TV ad sales for the entire year, though it probably makes more in actual ticket sales since the outdoor stadiums are bigger.