As a reminder, one of the founding principles of the Catholic Church is Covenant Fulfillment.
Namely, that once Christ died and was resurrected there ceased to be such a thing as jews. It was those who followed the Redeemer and those who did not.
And even if you subscribe to some modern nonsense about "well as long as they are good people, they can still get into heaven" the Jews have it in their books that Jesus was a liar and burns in pig shit in hell.
The literal only unforgiveable sin listed in the Bible was to blaspheme the Holy Spirit, who was testifying to Jesus came from God and was holy instead of demonic.
Which means there is still room for those who do not know (non-Abrahamic religions) or even accepted and built off it foolishly (Islam, Mormon) to make right with it all, but the Jews by their insistence on remaining Jews have committed the literal only thing the Bible considers unforgiveable.
Yes. The coming of Jesus fulfilled the old testament covenant, and instituted a new one, open to everyone. We all are God's chosen now, though the crucifixion of Jesus.
Israel is the church, not some tiny ethnic group. Paul says so explicitly in his letters. That beloved verse in Genesis that the dispensationalists so love is being misinterpreted, deliberately.
I don't see how you can be a Christian while also believing that Judaism is a perfectly fine religion. It's not. Otherwise, why did Christ and Paul convert Jews?
These 'Christian' Israel Firsters are traitors to more than just their country.
Hmmm, okay so lets consider the following example.
Someone borrows 200,000$, and has to pay 60,000$ each year, in 5 years. That's 300,000$. 100,000$ that did not exist in the first place.
So, instead of having to pay 300,000$ to the bankers, I pay off the debt early, avoiding paying any accrued interest. The person that owed 300,000$ to the bank now just owes me 200,000$+ one day of interest. That 100,000$ never existed.
.... yeah, this should work in eradicating debt. Now to tie a bunch of them longnose usurymongers up and explain this to use the steam from their heads to power a turbine for free electricity.
Each day I am more convinced this is a psyop. Both of these two were basically nothingburgers with dwindling popularity until like two months ago, but they keep getting treated as super ultra serious political figures on the rise. So much so that dozens of angles are trying to stomp on them, when they literally only have power because people keep talking about them and driving people into "well I hate you so I'll be with them" to supporting them.
It really feels as if they are being propped up for a purpose, and that purpose cannot be good. Whether its a scapegoat to "take down" to make Jews happy or a honeypot, who knows.
A broad range of sources and influencers act like Nick's ideas are original to him, when basically none of them are. He's just the last alt right influencer left standing. I wonder why that is??
Because he is a fed informant, given how he of all people was able to walk away from 1/6 unscathed and his own second in command claims he sold his followers' info to the feds after his own rallies.
Its why despite doing far more than most Far-Right influencers, he was left completely alone after 1/6 after being a decently big name in the aftermath of Charlottesville. And then suddenly he is on Tucker, everyone is supposed to take him dead serious and now his name is reaching the Pope's ears.
Its Andrew Tate all over again, but this time for antisemitism instead of antifeminism.
Yeah no kidding lol. Back in the wild west days he had a joint venture with James Allsup that he blew up by being a dramatic homo. James, one of the most reasonable, cogent voices on the alt right, then has his 400k subscriber channel banned and disappears into obscurity while Nick survives January 6th and goes on to endorse 10 or 20 brown, Muslim, or lib candidates while cavorting with Destiny.
I don't get that all the 'right' claims that Andrew Tate is innocent because he says so. Sure, the Romanian justice system is corrupt, but that doesn't make him innocent. Allegedly, he was caught after he was doing nasty stuff to American girls, rather than just Romanian girls whom they don't care about.
Tate isn't innocent of most things leveled at him, and I find his predatory camgirl empire that made him rich absolutely despicable and worthy of being hung even if it was fully legal.
But he was a big fish in a small pond, with only a marginal amount of reach outside the dregs of society. Until they blew him up into this boogeyman, and suddenly his reach was able to ensnare countless more simply because they never shut up about how dangerous and evil he was day after day. They made a monster just so they could have something to rally against.
Which is exactly what all this reeks of. Taking two people with almost no influence outside people who already believe everything they say, and then make them a martyr.
Both of them have been steadily gaining followers, I'm not sure why you think they were dwindling two months ago. Fuentes blew up in June because he called war with Iran and no Epstein files and Candace has been huge forever and both went to another level after Charlie died. Both have organic followings and have gotten more popular because people on the right feel sold out by Trump and are waking up to Jewish control and these two talk about it.
are waking up to Jewish control and these two talk about it.
This is all that matters to you, and anyone supporting these people. They are willing to say "DAE JEWS?!!?!?!" and everything else about them is ignored because they say what you want to hear. Anyone who brings unsavory facts up, gets accused of only doing so because they said negatives about Jews. Its a perfect defense cycle.
Candace was happy to take Jew money until it wasn't enough for her, and Fuentes literally sold his own followers out to the feds after 1/6 if not earlier. They are not your champion, they just know what will make you clap like a seal.
I don't really care if you like them or think they deserve their following, I'm just saying your description of their popularity is objectively wrong. I have no idea why you think they were dwindling 2 months ago or whatever, they have both steadily gotten more popular over the years and have blown up post October 7th because people wanted to talk about Israel/Jews. Like them or hate them, that's the reality of it
Because I was also paying attention to them, and they were blowing smoke into the wind that only people who already followed them were listening to. Candace had a brief uptick when she broke from Benji, but otherwise was still the same "we totally don't only listen to you because you are a niggress" diversity hire. Compared to their peaks, they were both fractions of themselves and likely would have petered out soonly and it only shows how recently you've started paying attention to think otherwise.
Then Kirk died and both used the dead man's corpse to grift themselves into the spotlight. And now people have to pretend they were totes always legit political forces and contenders to ignore how suspicious their sudden popularity is.
I'm not really following your logic here, I pay close attention to numbers and Candace has been doing huge numbers for a while, her Kamala stuff was massive, Macron stuff, then the Israel stuff took it even higher and the Charlie stuff sent her into the stratosphere. She has objectively been a political force for years, she was massive during the DW era for going against BLM etc, but she is bigger than ever and has only gotten bigger.
Nick only really became a force this year due to the combo of Epstein cover up and Iran bombing happening close together.
Candace was good friends with Charlie, the official story makes no sense. She should be investigating. And I'm not really sure how Nick is grifting off Charlie either, he doesn't mention him much.
You're free to dislike/distrust whoever you want, I'm not saying you have to like or respect either of them, but what you're saying about their relevance is just not reality. I also don't understand why you think it's suspicious that they're popular. People talking about Jews and Israel have dominated this year, the Israel/Gaza and Epstein stories have been massive, people are talking about AIPAC etc all over the place. Mainstream podcasts like Rogan, Theo, Tim Dillon etc are talking about it. Fuentes, Tucker and Candace are all befitting from a mass awakening on the right. Thats what the entire "woke right" debate has been about for a year. They have been trying to shut down Israel critics but they only get bigger.
Zionists are getting crushed in numbers too, Shapiro is buying views and is a joke now, the right has shifted massively in the past year or two.
Nick was literally one of the faces of the alt-right during Trump's first term and one of the biggest figures of the "terminally online" portion of it. He was one of the big names after Charlottesville and was a centerpiece of most political streaming.
His biggest peak was the "Groyper Wars" when he and Kirk literally feuded openly, with Nick sending his followers to disrupt and confront TPUSA and Kirk (and many other mainstream conservative figures) about Israel whenever they could. This was how he positioned himself as the "alternative" to the mainstream Right and as the big anti-Jew figure.
Kirk dying and people suspecting Israeli involvement was pure validation for him, and many of the mainstream discussions about him revolve around explaining what Groypers are and that entire period of discussion.
Almost like he, and Owens, have entire histories prior to the last two years and being your new champions. And propping up people as retarded as them attaches you to all their baggage as well, which is why it should concern you that they are the ones getting acknowledged. Its not because they are super awesome and a genuine threat, its because they are easily bought (again, Fed and someone who happily ate from Jewish wallets until she could monkey swing elsewhere) and look like fools if you don't already believe everything they say.
Nicks on a completely different level than he was during the groyper wars, because as I said the topic blew up on the right this year. This is much more simple than you're making it
As a reminder, one of the founding principles of the Catholic Church is Covenant Fulfillment.
Namely, that once Christ died and was resurrected there ceased to be such a thing as jews. It was those who followed the Redeemer and those who did not.
And even if you subscribe to some modern nonsense about "well as long as they are good people, they can still get into heaven" the Jews have it in their books that Jesus was a liar and burns in pig shit in hell.
The literal only unforgiveable sin listed in the Bible was to blaspheme the Holy Spirit, who was testifying to Jesus came from God and was holy instead of demonic.
Which means there is still room for those who do not know (non-Abrahamic religions) or even accepted and built off it foolishly (Islam, Mormon) to make right with it all, but the Jews by their insistence on remaining Jews have committed the literal only thing the Bible considers unforgiveable.
Yes. The coming of Jesus fulfilled the old testament covenant, and instituted a new one, open to everyone. We all are God's chosen now, though the crucifixion of Jesus.
Israel is the church, not some tiny ethnic group. Paul says so explicitly in his letters. That beloved verse in Genesis that the dispensationalists so love is being misinterpreted, deliberately.
Cool it with the antisemitism.
I don't see how you can be a Christian while also believing that Judaism is a perfectly fine religion. It's not. Otherwise, why did Christ and Paul convert Jews?
These 'Christian' Israel Firsters are traitors to more than just their country.
The existence of "sinful antisemitism" implies the existence of "pious antisemitism".
the_thinker.jpg
... wonder if that involves flipping banker tables and thrashing the nosecunt tribe with the Vampire Killer whip.
No, it’s just paying your debt off early.
Hmmm, okay so lets consider the following example.
Someone borrows 200,000$, and has to pay 60,000$ each year, in 5 years. That's 300,000$. 100,000$ that did not exist in the first place.
So, instead of having to pay 300,000$ to the bankers, I pay off the debt early, avoiding paying any accrued interest. The person that owed 300,000$ to the bank now just owes me 200,000$+ one day of interest. That 100,000$ never existed.
.... yeah, this should work in eradicating debt. Now to tie a bunch of them longnose usurymongers up and explain this to use the steam from their heads to power a turbine for free electricity.
They're so tone deaf. This would bring even more people, and Catholics specifically, into Nick's welcoming embrace.
Each day I am more convinced this is a psyop. Both of these two were basically nothingburgers with dwindling popularity until like two months ago, but they keep getting treated as super ultra serious political figures on the rise. So much so that dozens of angles are trying to stomp on them, when they literally only have power because people keep talking about them and driving people into "well I hate you so I'll be with them" to supporting them.
It really feels as if they are being propped up for a purpose, and that purpose cannot be good. Whether its a scapegoat to "take down" to make Jews happy or a honeypot, who knows.
A broad range of sources and influencers act like Nick's ideas are original to him, when basically none of them are. He's just the last alt right influencer left standing. I wonder why that is??
Because he is a fed informant, given how he of all people was able to walk away from 1/6 unscathed and his own second in command claims he sold his followers' info to the feds after his own rallies.
Its why despite doing far more than most Far-Right influencers, he was left completely alone after 1/6 after being a decently big name in the aftermath of Charlottesville. And then suddenly he is on Tucker, everyone is supposed to take him dead serious and now his name is reaching the Pope's ears.
Its Andrew Tate all over again, but this time for antisemitism instead of antifeminism.
Yeah no kidding lol. Back in the wild west days he had a joint venture with James Allsup that he blew up by being a dramatic homo. James, one of the most reasonable, cogent voices on the alt right, then has his 400k subscriber channel banned and disappears into obscurity while Nick survives January 6th and goes on to endorse 10 or 20 brown, Muslim, or lib candidates while cavorting with Destiny.
It's actually a bit worse than you think. Not only did Nick Fuentes get away from January 6th free, two of his associates, Elijah Schafer and Tayler Hansen also got away with no charges whatsoever despite BOTH having entered the capital building. Fuentes even posted proof that he was warned about attending Jan 6th, yet still commanded a crowd to "break down the barriers and disregard the police". He glows brighter than the sun to anyone who's actually paying attention.
Oh I know how much worse it gets, because I have a memory that goes back further than 6 months, unlike seemingly everyone who is propping him up.
I don't get that all the 'right' claims that Andrew Tate is innocent because he says so. Sure, the Romanian justice system is corrupt, but that doesn't make him innocent. Allegedly, he was caught after he was doing nasty stuff to American girls, rather than just Romanian girls whom they don't care about.
Tate isn't innocent of most things leveled at him, and I find his predatory camgirl empire that made him rich absolutely despicable and worthy of being hung even if it was fully legal.
But he was a big fish in a small pond, with only a marginal amount of reach outside the dregs of society. Until they blew him up into this boogeyman, and suddenly his reach was able to ensnare countless more simply because they never shut up about how dangerous and evil he was day after day. They made a monster just so they could have something to rally against.
Which is exactly what all this reeks of. Taking two people with almost no influence outside people who already believe everything they say, and then make them a martyr.
Maybe just to sabotage the right.
Both of them have been steadily gaining followers, I'm not sure why you think they were dwindling two months ago. Fuentes blew up in June because he called war with Iran and no Epstein files and Candace has been huge forever and both went to another level after Charlie died. Both have organic followings and have gotten more popular because people on the right feel sold out by Trump and are waking up to Jewish control and these two talk about it.
Lol. I suppose grifting is organic these days.
This is all that matters to you, and anyone supporting these people. They are willing to say "DAE JEWS?!!?!?!" and everything else about them is ignored because they say what you want to hear. Anyone who brings unsavory facts up, gets accused of only doing so because they said negatives about Jews. Its a perfect defense cycle.
Candace was happy to take Jew money until it wasn't enough for her, and Fuentes literally sold his own followers out to the feds after 1/6 if not earlier. They are not your champion, they just know what will make you clap like a seal.
I don't really care if you like them or think they deserve their following, I'm just saying your description of their popularity is objectively wrong. I have no idea why you think they were dwindling 2 months ago or whatever, they have both steadily gotten more popular over the years and have blown up post October 7th because people wanted to talk about Israel/Jews. Like them or hate them, that's the reality of it
Because I was also paying attention to them, and they were blowing smoke into the wind that only people who already followed them were listening to. Candace had a brief uptick when she broke from Benji, but otherwise was still the same "we totally don't only listen to you because you are a niggress" diversity hire. Compared to their peaks, they were both fractions of themselves and likely would have petered out soonly and it only shows how recently you've started paying attention to think otherwise.
Then Kirk died and both used the dead man's corpse to grift themselves into the spotlight. And now people have to pretend they were totes always legit political forces and contenders to ignore how suspicious their sudden popularity is.
I'm not really following your logic here, I pay close attention to numbers and Candace has been doing huge numbers for a while, her Kamala stuff was massive, Macron stuff, then the Israel stuff took it even higher and the Charlie stuff sent her into the stratosphere. She has objectively been a political force for years, she was massive during the DW era for going against BLM etc, but she is bigger than ever and has only gotten bigger.
Nick only really became a force this year due to the combo of Epstein cover up and Iran bombing happening close together.
Candace was good friends with Charlie, the official story makes no sense. She should be investigating. And I'm not really sure how Nick is grifting off Charlie either, he doesn't mention him much.
You're free to dislike/distrust whoever you want, I'm not saying you have to like or respect either of them, but what you're saying about their relevance is just not reality. I also don't understand why you think it's suspicious that they're popular. People talking about Jews and Israel have dominated this year, the Israel/Gaza and Epstein stories have been massive, people are talking about AIPAC etc all over the place. Mainstream podcasts like Rogan, Theo, Tim Dillon etc are talking about it. Fuentes, Tucker and Candace are all befitting from a mass awakening on the right. Thats what the entire "woke right" debate has been about for a year. They have been trying to shut down Israel critics but they only get bigger.
Zionists are getting crushed in numbers too, Shapiro is buying views and is a joke now, the right has shifted massively in the past year or two.
Nick was literally one of the faces of the alt-right during Trump's first term and one of the biggest figures of the "terminally online" portion of it. He was one of the big names after Charlottesville and was a centerpiece of most political streaming.
His biggest peak was the "Groyper Wars" when he and Kirk literally feuded openly, with Nick sending his followers to disrupt and confront TPUSA and Kirk (and many other mainstream conservative figures) about Israel whenever they could. This was how he positioned himself as the "alternative" to the mainstream Right and as the big anti-Jew figure.
Kirk dying and people suspecting Israeli involvement was pure validation for him, and many of the mainstream discussions about him revolve around explaining what Groypers are and that entire period of discussion.
Almost like he, and Owens, have entire histories prior to the last two years and being your new champions. And propping up people as retarded as them attaches you to all their baggage as well, which is why it should concern you that they are the ones getting acknowledged. Its not because they are super awesome and a genuine threat, its because they are easily bought (again, Fed and someone who happily ate from Jewish wallets until she could monkey swing elsewhere) and look like fools if you don't already believe everything they say.
Nicks on a completely different level than he was during the groyper wars, because as I said the topic blew up on the right this year. This is much more simple than you're making it
Jesus died for that so we can keep turning tabled at markets, I think I am good
I’m ready to start another crusade.
Vatican 2 is fake and gay!
Jews = 💩