It's nothing more than the same repeated points about industry exploiting people with attempts to blame problems between the sexes on porn and men at the end of the interview.
It's also outdated as there will be a shift to A.I generated erotic media with it's own different problems.
Bear in mind a lot of anti porn factions don't have men or sex workers best interests in mind. There's a reason why terms like tradcuck exist.
Others have been saying for decades that the age of consent to perform in pxrn should be 25-years-old for this very reason.
and do the same for driving,voting,the military and all the others?
The reason is that communists are subhuman demons who thinks you’re going to change your behavior away from objective reality because they called you insulting words.
There are no replies. It's fine if you disagree, but can you at least explain why? He seems to be making good points.
While not taking a stance on if he's correct, I don't like the "25 year maturity" argument, as that is also used to go easy on criminals. For some reason, the woke establishment thinks that 5-year-olds are developed enough to choose to deny their gender, but 24-year-olds aren't developed enough to know that murder and rape are wrong.
Because he took down this thread and reposted it with the exact content to try to get more engagement. Also, like a Twitter faggot.
The "sexual maturity at 25" thing is also a classic argument of people trying to close the overlap between the healthy fertility window and social acceptance window to zero among Whites in the West, while everyone else pumps out kids.
Because he took down this thread and reposted it with the exact content to try to get more engagement.
That is a reason to downvote the thread, but not the comment.
The "sexual maturity at 25" thing is also a classic argument of people trying to close the overlap between the healthy fertility window and social acceptance window to zero among Whites in the West, while everyone else pumps out kids.
Yeah, I really doubt that anyone thinks that 24-year-olds should not have sex, or that this is used for that at all. Like I said, I dislike the argument for different reasons, but not because it's anti-[w]hite.
They just want to infantilize women because they hate males, plus some would say it's some kind of weird mating strategy, because women hate men going after other women under the age of 30. It's basically one huge avoidance of accountability attempt mixed with misandry
I didn't watch the video. Did he address the coming AI pornopocalypse or other non-porn-industry forms of obscenity? There are many good arguments against porn but if human trafficking in the industry is his problem, that will be mostly eliminated in a decade.
Why was the other version deleted?
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/1ARJr1byiH/x/c/
I'm guessing it wasn't getting a reaction, so he deleted it to put it atop the forum hoping for a better reaction
It's nothing more than the same repeated points about industry exploiting people with attempts to blame problems between the sexes on porn and men at the end of the interview. It's also outdated as there will be a shift to A.I generated erotic media with it's own different problems.
Bear in mind a lot of anti porn factions don't have men or sex workers best interests in mind. There's a reason why terms like tradcuck exist.
and do the same for driving,voting,the military and all the others?
They are tradcucks because of this simple reason.
Tradcuck: women are like kids, you can't trust them or give them responsibilities
Non-tradcuck: So, you are giving men their authority back?
Tradcuck: lol no. We need men police other men, using the state if necessary in order to protect women
No they just relish the idea of infantilizing women so that they can avoid culpability, and then also call men groomers and rapists.
The reason is that communists are subhuman demons who thinks you’re going to change your behavior away from objective reality because they called you insulting words.
Guess it worked on you.
Reported for antisemitism
There are no replies. It's fine if you disagree, but can you at least explain why? He seems to be making good points.
While not taking a stance on if he's correct, I don't like the "25 year maturity" argument, as that is also used to go easy on criminals. For some reason, the woke establishment thinks that 5-year-olds are developed enough to choose to deny their gender, but 24-year-olds aren't developed enough to know that murder and rape are wrong.
Because he took down this thread and reposted it with the exact content to try to get more engagement. Also, like a Twitter faggot.
The "sexual maturity at 25" thing is also a classic argument of people trying to close the overlap between the healthy fertility window and social acceptance window to zero among Whites in the West, while everyone else pumps out kids.
That is a reason to downvote the thread, but not the comment.
Yeah, I really doubt that anyone thinks that 24-year-olds should not have sex, or that this is used for that at all. Like I said, I dislike the argument for different reasons, but not because it's anti-[w]hite.
Comment is also a repost from the other thread.
They just want to infantilize women because they hate males, plus some would say it's some kind of weird mating strategy, because women hate men going after other women under the age of 30. It's basically one huge avoidance of accountability attempt mixed with misandry
Because he writes "pxrn" and "p*rn" like a Twitter faggot
I didn't watch the video. Did he address the coming AI pornopocalypse or other non-porn-industry forms of obscenity? There are many good arguments against porn but if human trafficking in the industry is his problem, that will be mostly eliminated in a decade.