Or why no one talks about how utterly evil fire bombing is. Because that tactic was literally designed to kill as many civilians as humanely possible.
It was designed to cause a firestorm in a densely populated area that reached temperatures high enough to completely incinerate bones. People out in the open got sucked in to get burned to ash and those unfortunate souls who were hiding in bomb shelters were cooked alive and the lucky ones were suffocated because the firestorm sucked up all the oxygen.
It wasn't about destroying infrastructure, factories, railways or anything that was actually militarily important. It was exclusively about deliberate mass murder. Or in a single word: genocide.
I find it funny that you never really see any pushback about the fact that the Manhattan Project was originally building nukes to drop on Germany. But the fact that nukes broke the Japanese and saved them from fighting to the last is lamented by every leftist "historian".
Yes. Before WW2 (1939). Twenty years before it to be exact. What's with the sudden upswing in bad-faith argumentation? Are you trying to prove something?
I'd ask if you're fucking retarded enough to think that the events of WW1 and what proceeded after it didn't have anything to do with WW2, but I know you're not.
It is something that always blew my fucking mind. How you are taught WW2 and they always make sure to ignore this one detail... when jewish communists massacred Germans and took power in Germany. Seems pretty fucking relevant to me.
Super weird how you never hear about history like this or the attempted jewish communist coup before WWII! Must not be too important I guess.
Or why no one talks about how utterly evil fire bombing is. Because that tactic was literally designed to kill as many civilians as humanely possible.
It was designed to cause a firestorm in a densely populated area that reached temperatures high enough to completely incinerate bones. People out in the open got sucked in to get burned to ash and those unfortunate souls who were hiding in bomb shelters were cooked alive and the lucky ones were suffocated because the firestorm sucked up all the oxygen.
It wasn't about destroying infrastructure, factories, railways or anything that was actually militarily important. It was exclusively about deliberate mass murder. Or in a single word: genocide.
Sounds like some kind of burnt offering! That's super weird!
Literal tornadoes of fire melting civilians. And the Allies were somehow the good guys while doing that and dropping nukes.
Dropping a nuke is more humane than turning a city into literal hellfire.
I'd argue it's still pretty bad and that they did it in addition to the hellfire compounds their crimes.
I find it funny that you never really see any pushback about the fact that the Manhattan Project was originally building nukes to drop on Germany. But the fact that nukes broke the Japanese and saved them from fighting to the last is lamented by every leftist "historian".
Funny how all we hear about the 1920s is Prohibition, jazz music and the Charleston.
Do tell.
Rosa Luxemburg. 1919.
Before WW2? Do you know when WW2 started? This was long before the Nazis even came to power...
Yes. Before WW2 (1939). Twenty years before it to be exact. What's with the sudden upswing in bad-faith argumentation? Are you trying to prove something?
I'd ask if you're fucking retarded enough to think that the events of WW1 and what proceeded after it didn't have anything to do with WW2, but I know you're not.
So I'm asking why you think we're that retarded.
ah yea you're right, I guess WW1 had nothing to do with WW2 either because it started even further back in history!
I'm sure you'll let us all know why we should care about the holocaust 80 years on though
It is something that always blew my fucking mind. How you are taught WW2 and they always make sure to ignore this one detail... when jewish communists massacred Germans and took power in Germany. Seems pretty fucking relevant to me.