What does it say about me that I'm getting better at filtering those kinds of noises? Not that they don't bother me at all, but that I'm better at not letting them completely throw me like they used to.
Tolerating them when they're outside your control = good
Tolerating them when they're within your control = bad
That's how I see it anyhow.
First 2 are obvious but something like dog barking you'll often see low-IQ people not bother dealing with whereas high IQ people don't tolerate their dog barking without very good reason.
It says that you're not a self righteous autistic leaning into sensory intolerance and confusing it for intelligence.
You know what is an actual, proven sign of low IQ? Being unable to filter background noise and focus on a specific sound, specifically voices in noisy environments. The higher the IQ, the better people usually perform noise filtering tests.
Just to steelman them, it makes more sense if you presume that was directed at my first statement rather than the second.
autistic leaning into sensory intolerance and confusing it for intelligence.
Not that I think misophonia is usually considered a mark of intelligence, but it is a pretty subjective diagnosis and a tempting excuse to lean into sensory intolerance instead of exercising mental restraint.
Yes this is why niggers are loud all the time everywhere and never change their smoke alarm batteries, because of their incredibly high IQ noise filtering ability.
What does it say about me that I'm getting better at filtering those kinds of noises? Not that they don't bother me at all, but that I'm better at not letting them completely throw me like they used to.
There's a distinction to be made between developing mental discipline and simply not actually having the mental capacity to deal with minor problems.
More like minority problems.
Tolerating them when they're outside your control = good
Tolerating them when they're within your control = bad
That's how I see it anyhow.
First 2 are obvious but something like dog barking you'll often see low-IQ people not bother dealing with whereas high IQ people don't tolerate their dog barking without very good reason.
It says that you're not a self righteous autistic leaning into sensory intolerance and confusing it for intelligence.
You know what is an actual, proven sign of low IQ? Being unable to filter background noise and focus on a specific sound, specifically voices in noisy environments. The higher the IQ, the better people usually perform noise filtering tests.
That's not what this post is about. Being able to filter information and tolerating unnecessary noise aren't the same thing.
Yes, they're different things, that's why I said them as separate statements.
They even made up a word for it (misophonia) so they could be victims of a special disease instead of just being autistic.
Misophonia is an extreme dislike of certain sounds, not an inability to filter out noise from audio signal.
Just to steelman them, it makes more sense if you presume that was directed at my first statement rather than the second.
Not that I think misophonia is usually considered a mark of intelligence, but it is a pretty subjective diagnosis and a tempting excuse to lean into sensory intolerance instead of exercising mental restraint.
Yes this is why niggers are loud all the time everywhere and never change their smoke alarm batteries, because of their incredibly high IQ noise filtering ability.
Means you're dying on the inside and becoming apathetic to the decaying society around you.