Libertarians are completely ideologically defenseless against organized hostile collectivists. That is why they constantly get bodyslammed by the main two parties in every election even if they have a much better candidate (like Ron Paul).
Their policies, even though I like most of them, can only really exist in a society comprised of 130+ IQ Whites. Any kind of multi racial or multi ethnic society is a death sentence for libertarian ideals because the different ethnic groups will just collectivize for their own advantage. You already see this with Indians in western countries once their population gets large enough.
Some lolberts like Clint Russel are starting to become more racially aware and are starting to break out of their lolbert programming, but you also have lolberts like Dave Smith who think Vivek is going to let Dave's kids have a job.
Libertarianism is a utopianist ideology on par with communism. “If everyone just does X, then we’ll be all good.” Everyone is not going to do X. They never have, and they never will.
Libertarians can't even agree on what being a libertarian is. That's how individualist they are. It's just constant infighting to the point where they have different caucuses in their own party vying for control.
That and "free" trade where we have to tie both hands behind our backs while everybody else doesnt play by the same rules and fucks us over undercutting our markets and stealing all our industry. Because fighting tariffs with tariffs is bad somehow.
The position is fascinating when you think about it. they want the borders to be open so that anyone can come in and out without vetting, but they want to get rid of the welfare systems the cost so much and cause people to become dependent on the government.
their rationale is that getting rid of an incentive for leeches to come would halt the hordes, making everything balance out, but they ignore the human trafficking and crime aspect of open borders.
Rand Paul is a libertarian and the libertarians are essentially pro-open border. it's the biggest downside of their position.
Lolberts have no answer for bad faith. They never have.
Libertarians are completely ideologically defenseless against organized hostile collectivists. That is why they constantly get bodyslammed by the main two parties in every election even if they have a much better candidate (like Ron Paul).
Their policies, even though I like most of them, can only really exist in a society comprised of 130+ IQ Whites. Any kind of multi racial or multi ethnic society is a death sentence for libertarian ideals because the different ethnic groups will just collectivize for their own advantage. You already see this with Indians in western countries once their population gets large enough.
Some lolberts like Clint Russel are starting to become more racially aware and are starting to break out of their lolbert programming, but you also have lolberts like Dave Smith who think Vivek is going to let Dave's kids have a job.
Libertarianism is a utopianist ideology on par with communism. “If everyone just does X, then we’ll be all good.” Everyone is not going to do X. They never have, and they never will.
Libertarians can't even agree on what being a libertarian is. That's how individualist they are. It's just constant infighting to the point where they have different caucuses in their own party vying for control.
That and "free" trade where we have to tie both hands behind our backs while everybody else doesnt play by the same rules and fucks us over undercutting our markets and stealing all our industry. Because fighting tariffs with tariffs is bad somehow.
Rand Paul said “build a wall around our welfare system” (and they will stop themselves from coming)
The position is fascinating when you think about it. they want the borders to be open so that anyone can come in and out without vetting, but they want to get rid of the welfare systems the cost so much and cause people to become dependent on the government.
their rationale is that getting rid of an incentive for leeches to come would halt the hordes, making everything balance out, but they ignore the human trafficking and crime aspect of open borders.