All law is fake. It's highly selectively enforced, and even if it is enforced, it's just a set of instructions for judges, and if the judges ignore it, there are often no repercussions. See: "Living document".
Yvette Cooper's Home Office Defies Epping Ban on Asylum Hotel
The Home Office, led by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, has appealed a High Court injunction banning asylum seekers from the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, arguing that migrants' human rights under international law outweigh local safety and planning concerns amid reports of protests and alleged offenses. Lawyers for the Home Office described housing asylum seekers as "critical national infrastructure," dismissing crime links and warning of broader impacts if similar bans spread. The appeal has ignited backlash from politicians and social media, with critics like Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe and Conservative MP Chris Philp condemning it as a betrayal of British citizens, highlighting deep divisions over migration policies.
Lawyers acting on behalf of Yvette Cooper have said 'the rights of illegal migrants are more important than the people of Epping'
2
The Home Office is appealing the decision to close the Bell Hotel.
The gov argues the rights of asylum seekers trumps the rights of Epping locals.
Edward Brown KC, for the Home Office, told the Court of Appeal that housing asylum seekers was “in the national interest”.
3
The Home Office instructed their lawyers to argue that the rights of illegal immigrants claiming asylum are more important than those of local people
4
The rights of asylum seekers are more important than those of Epping council according to Home Office lawyers when making their submissions to the Court of Appeal on behalf of Yvette Cooper.
5
Keir Starmer’s government have just argued that it is in the ‘national interest’ to give illegal immigrants free hotels.
I don't think they realise that this means one next pssible step from the locals is to make it so hostile that it could be considered a violation of the migrants' human rights to place them there.
This has mostly been the ladies, the women and girls, that have been out to protest peacefully. Don't give them a reason to send the lads out. They won't be so peaceful.
I've had similar thoughts for how Britain could solve this whole situation: if you tell France that you're sending them back with or without bodybags, now France has to offer them asylum, right?
Immigration is war. Specifically, war against the White race.
"International law" is fake.
All law is fake. It's highly selectively enforced, and even if it is enforced, it's just a set of instructions for judges, and if the judges ignore it, there are often no repercussions. See: "Living document".
I didn't know Andrew Wilson posts here.
Labour in the UK say the very quiet part out loud.
Similar to the last post I made this is a link of an archive of Twitter trends regarding the development of the same story.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/19BtGYhV6y/get-womped-uk-high-court-evicts-/c/
https://x.com/i/trending/1961152174702133574
1
2
3
4
5
And so on.
I don't think they realise that this means one next pssible step from the locals is to make it so hostile that it could be considered a violation of the migrants' human rights to place them there.
This has mostly been the ladies, the women and girls, that have been out to protest peacefully. Don't give them a reason to send the lads out. They won't be so peaceful.
I've had similar thoughts for how Britain could solve this whole situation: if you tell France that you're sending them back with or without bodybags, now France has to offer them asylum, right?
The next possible step is to kill the invaders and the traitor politicians that put them there.
From where are they emigrating and why are those places so shit? 🤔
"See I have some top secret clown business that supersedes any plans that you might have for this here vehicle".
Does this mean occupancy laws go out the window so you can get paid the house 50 migrants in the same two bedroom apartment?