Maga talking points words for word, just replaced other races with Afghans.
I didn't realize MAGA was explicitly racial. And "Hispanic" isn't a race, per se.
But, yes, every nation should expel foreigners that are detrimental to that nation's people. So if Afghans in Iran are a problem...yeah, deport. Iran should do that because, no matter how anyone feels about Iran, Iran obviously should be working in the interests of Iranians. It's practically their only job.
MAGA flavored fascism despite the fact...blah blah...fascism.
People HATE the current fascist government...
It's like this person has never picked up a history book or even glanced at Wikipedia. Fascists fight fascists all the time, just like they fight socialists and communists, and how socialists and communists are always murdering each other too.
Extremist or authoritarian government styles are often put into place when the people feel they need a very harsh answer to harsh problems. It doesn't always make sense. Sometimes the leaders proposing the best sounding answers to the fascist problem are fascists, or the people with the best sounding plan to the socialist problem are socialists. Heck, the most famous fascists were...National Socialists.
It's just fucking braindead to act like people are stupid for wanting fascism to fight fascism. You can argue with the rationality, or say it won't have a good outcome, or whatever...but it's understandable, if you look at history.
When shit breaks down, people look toward someone who promises to fix it. If the option is between a nationalist/populist and a ineffectual traitor...the nationalist/populist is going to capture hearts and minds. Even if he's a fascist, or a socialist, or a communist.
It's usually tragic, but it's also a basic check on the power of the elite, if they don't have the interests of their own people in mind. Screw people over for too long, they'll elect (or "elect") an extremist to...deal with the problem.
"How could people want fascism, when we're already suffering under fascism?" Well, firstly, random Redditor, you sound like a leftist, so I don't trust you to define...well, anything. But even assuming they were both fascists...maybe the fascist people are rallying around is promising solutions to the problems, and to put the people first. Maybe they're lying, maybe they're for real, but people are fucking sick of being betrayed over and over again by their own leaders.
I found the original thread. It is an r / news thread about the "far right" Sanseito party "shocking gains" in their most recent election. Predictably, because of course it is in r / news, it is full of redditiots who cannot see the real root of the problem.
Japanese people want Japan to be Japanese, not Somali, Han Chinese, or Vietnamese, or whatever other migrants come to their lands. Thanks to social media everyone can see what is happening in Europe, Australia, and the US, and they don't want that in their homeland.
(Burma) has been ruined and heavily oppressed by a fascist military junta
The only thing that ruined Burma was when the usual interferers (i.e. the UN, NATO) tried to foist that dirty commie Aung San Suu Kyi into power and the Burmese bought it so little that they ended up televising the subsequent coup.
I doubt that these clowns are even living in those countries. They're probably living somewhere in the West and have contracted the USAIDS mind virus from the locals, hence this open display of terminal symptoms online.
To the first brown clown: The Islamic Republic of Iran almost went to war with the Islamic Emirate (Afghanistan) in the 1990s. Iran appears to have even helped the US against Afghanistan during the early stages of the American occupation. The notion that animosity between some Iranians and some Afghans is somehow new is misinformation and long predates 2016. I can just as easily point to the Tehran Eight and Hezb-e-Wahdat as examples of good relations between Iran and Afghanistan throughout the past few decades.
To the second brown clown: Whatever the military rulers are, they have nothing to do with Fascism, nor did they destroy Myanmar. Actually, they've governed it almost uninterrupted since 1962. Thus, wouldn't they have destroyed Myanmar decades ago if they were so ruinous? Military rule goes back to the Buddhist-Marxist rule of General Ne Win (r. 1962-1988). After the famous 8888 Uprising of August 8, 1988, political power shifted from Leftist military officers to the more Rightist military officers of the SLORC, but these people remained closer to Buddhism than to any other belief system. In other words, Marxism got axed and Buddhism survived as the sole belief system, and Fascism is nowhere to be seen. The closest thing to the Far-Right are the fringe 'nationalist monks', but the government isn't particularly friendly to them, since they do not always share the same agenda.
As for relevant political parties, the NUP, descended from the Ne Win regime, while more Right-Wing these days, isn't even supportive of the government. That just leaves the main political party, that created by elements of the junta, the USDP, but they also lack Fascist characteristics, such as, for instance, in being too supportive of the free market. The bitter irony here is that the Left-liberal Aung San - who the West idolized, and whose father was a Marxist - and her NLD party were actually more anti-free market than the military rulers during the period in the 2010s in which the military ceded most political power to them. In an economic sense, the NLD was actually closer to Fascism than the junta and the USDP. Aung San did not want international corporations in Myanmar that did not engage only in State-sanctioned economic activity. If we agree that you can come in to manufacture, say, cars, manufacturing anything else would be breaking the deal, because that is not what we agreed upon.
There are other political parties, but they are all more fringe and less relevant than these three: he is probably thinking about the aforementioned three only, none of which are Fascist.
I also doubt his claim about the junta's unpopularity: it is unpopular among ethnic minorities living in the border regions. Practically every Burmese insurgent group has some sort of ethnic minority character. Many of them have ethnicities in their titles. Chances are, he is of a non-Burman ethnic minority and simply knows the opinions of Burmese living in the West, who would also be disproportionately non-Burmans. The true lesson of Myanmar is the failure of multiculturalism even among people who are highly similar and has nothing to do with an imagined Fascism.
Fascism fascism fascism. Those people are broken
Retarded beyond repair
Iran recently deported 1.8 million Afghans in 3 months. Iran's government seems more legit. Which is probably why isarel hates them.
I smell a deal. We let mullahs solve our illegal problem and in exchange we lift the sanctions and stop trying to start a war.
During times of war, foreigners are a liability.
It's retards on Reddit being retards.
I didn't realize MAGA was explicitly racial. And "Hispanic" isn't a race, per se.
But, yes, every nation should expel foreigners that are detrimental to that nation's people. So if Afghans in Iran are a problem...yeah, deport. Iran should do that because, no matter how anyone feels about Iran, Iran obviously should be working in the interests of Iranians. It's practically their only job.
It's like this person has never picked up a history book or even glanced at Wikipedia. Fascists fight fascists all the time, just like they fight socialists and communists, and how socialists and communists are always murdering each other too.
Extremist or authoritarian government styles are often put into place when the people feel they need a very harsh answer to harsh problems. It doesn't always make sense. Sometimes the leaders proposing the best sounding answers to the fascist problem are fascists, or the people with the best sounding plan to the socialist problem are socialists. Heck, the most famous fascists were...National Socialists.
It's just fucking braindead to act like people are stupid for wanting fascism to fight fascism. You can argue with the rationality, or say it won't have a good outcome, or whatever...but it's understandable, if you look at history.
When shit breaks down, people look toward someone who promises to fix it. If the option is between a nationalist/populist and a ineffectual traitor...the nationalist/populist is going to capture hearts and minds. Even if he's a fascist, or a socialist, or a communist.
It's usually tragic, but it's also a basic check on the power of the elite, if they don't have the interests of their own people in mind. Screw people over for too long, they'll elect (or "elect") an extremist to...deal with the problem.
"How could people want fascism, when we're already suffering under fascism?" Well, firstly, random Redditor, you sound like a leftist, so I don't trust you to define...well, anything. But even assuming they were both fascists...maybe the fascist people are rallying around is promising solutions to the problems, and to put the people first. Maybe they're lying, maybe they're for real, but people are fucking sick of being betrayed over and over again by their own leaders.
I found the original thread. It is an r / news thread about the "far right" Sanseito party "shocking gains" in their most recent election. Predictably, because of course it is in r / news, it is full of redditiots who cannot see the real root of the problem.
Japanese people want Japan to be Japanese, not Somali, Han Chinese, or Vietnamese, or whatever other migrants come to their lands. Thanks to social media everyone can see what is happening in Europe, Australia, and the US, and they don't want that in their homeland.
this is good. the government of a country's first priority should be making their nation greater.
Iran for Iranians, Sudan for Sudanese, China for Chinese, USA for Americans.
The only thing that ruined Burma was when the usual interferers (i.e. the UN, NATO) tried to foist that dirty commie Aung San Suu Kyi into power and the Burmese bought it so little that they ended up televising the subsequent coup.
I doubt that these clowns are even living in those countries. They're probably living somewhere in the West and have contracted the USAIDS mind virus from the locals, hence this open display of terminal symptoms online.
To the first brown clown: The Islamic Republic of Iran almost went to war with the Islamic Emirate (Afghanistan) in the 1990s. Iran appears to have even helped the US against Afghanistan during the early stages of the American occupation. The notion that animosity between some Iranians and some Afghans is somehow new is misinformation and long predates 2016. I can just as easily point to the Tehran Eight and Hezb-e-Wahdat as examples of good relations between Iran and Afghanistan throughout the past few decades.
To the second brown clown: Whatever the military rulers are, they have nothing to do with Fascism, nor did they destroy Myanmar. Actually, they've governed it almost uninterrupted since 1962. Thus, wouldn't they have destroyed Myanmar decades ago if they were so ruinous? Military rule goes back to the Buddhist-Marxist rule of General Ne Win (r. 1962-1988). After the famous 8888 Uprising of August 8, 1988, political power shifted from Leftist military officers to the more Rightist military officers of the SLORC, but these people remained closer to Buddhism than to any other belief system. In other words, Marxism got axed and Buddhism survived as the sole belief system, and Fascism is nowhere to be seen. The closest thing to the Far-Right are the fringe 'nationalist monks', but the government isn't particularly friendly to them, since they do not always share the same agenda.
As for relevant political parties, the NUP, descended from the Ne Win regime, while more Right-Wing these days, isn't even supportive of the government. That just leaves the main political party, that created by elements of the junta, the USDP, but they also lack Fascist characteristics, such as, for instance, in being too supportive of the free market. The bitter irony here is that the Left-liberal Aung San - who the West idolized, and whose father was a Marxist - and her NLD party were actually more anti-free market than the military rulers during the period in the 2010s in which the military ceded most political power to them. In an economic sense, the NLD was actually closer to Fascism than the junta and the USDP. Aung San did not want international corporations in Myanmar that did not engage only in State-sanctioned economic activity. If we agree that you can come in to manufacture, say, cars, manufacturing anything else would be breaking the deal, because that is not what we agreed upon.
There are other political parties, but they are all more fringe and less relevant than these three: he is probably thinking about the aforementioned three only, none of which are Fascist.
I also doubt his claim about the junta's unpopularity: it is unpopular among ethnic minorities living in the border regions. Practically every Burmese insurgent group has some sort of ethnic minority character. Many of them have ethnicities in their titles. Chances are, he is of a non-Burman ethnic minority and simply knows the opinions of Burmese living in the West, who would also be disproportionately non-Burmans. The true lesson of Myanmar is the failure of multiculturalism even among people who are highly similar and has nothing to do with an imagined Fascism.
10$ these people arent living in those countries. Best case scenario, their parents originated there and they're larping from CA or NY.
More likely is just white people larping as browns. Leftoids love doing that. Black People Twitter showed us that lmao
Finally an alternative to the worldwide globo homo
A reddit screenshot of what could very plausibly be bots. Very compelling and indicative of anything at all.
Hating foreigners for shitting up your country is nothing new under the sun.