Okay, so there''s this skeevy bitchhead for a Mexican president, right? Absolute jackass. So what we do is fly a few B2 bombers, and fucking shadow her wherever she goes. Major event? Speech? Whatever, it's cool. Then you start dropping mexican illegals taken by ICE around her via B2 bomber bays. Just wherever the fuck she goes, fucking random-ass illegals falling from the sky. She's sleeping? Doesn't fuckin' matter, a goddamn mexican smashes in through the ceiling and splatters into the bedroom.
Keep it up until the lizard-faced freak surrenders. Murica! Fuck yeah!
Al-Dawlah Lashkar is a known terrorist organization seeking to reinstate the 'Islamic State' after their defeat in 2017. Their name meaning "The State's Army", they are vicious and dangerous criminals who have no issue with running drugs and prostitution to ensnare politicians into blackmail. Veterans of the Islamic State, they are well funded by the State Department of the USA via money laundering through CAIR, the Pentagon and wealthy donors in Qatar, Israel and Saudi Arabia.
Their current "caliph" is Jaufar "Jonathan" Greenblatt, with a bounty of 6,000,000US$ on his head.
As well they shouldn't. Immigration is a federal jurisdiction and a foreign nation forming immigration agreements with a state is a disaster waiting to happen. Just like the US wouldn't bypass Canada to have a border agreement with Alberta.
And you should be glad that it isn't. You want Mexico forming immigration policy directly with California?
Is Texas forming their own immigration policy or are they just following federal immigration policy? Seems like local governance should pretty easily be able to handle border jumpers and not need every single illegal to be handled by the feds.
Maybe I put it poorly. These policies are between nations. When the Sherriff Dept. of Random County, TX shows up at the border and says, "take this guy," it shouldn't be surprising if Mexico's response is, "we have a repatriation agreements with the US government, but who the fuck are you?"
Everything with national borders is a pain in the ass, even when it should be easy. Practically, local LEO drops their asses at a CBP, ICE, USBP station and they get processed and deported from there. There's no direct repatriation agreement between the state of Texas and Mexico.
Except that time they refused a deportation flight a few months ago. Or the time they said they wouldn’t accept Mexicans deported by Texas “under any circumstances.”
I’m sure Mexico has been making the entire process a pain.
Okay, so there''s this skeevy bitchhead for a Mexican president, right? Absolute jackass. So what we do is fly a few B2 bombers, and fucking shadow her wherever she goes. Major event? Speech? Whatever, it's cool. Then you start dropping mexican illegals taken by ICE around her via B2 bomber bays. Just wherever the fuck she goes, fucking random-ass illegals falling from the sky. She's sleeping? Doesn't fuckin' matter, a goddamn mexican smashes in through the ceiling and splatters into the bedroom.
Keep it up until the lizard-faced freak surrenders. Murica! Fuck yeah!
President Sheinbaum has reported you the ADL for Auntie Shemmie's tism.
It's rainin' spics, Hallelujah...
ADL Fact file:
Al-Dawlah Lashkar is a known terrorist organization seeking to reinstate the 'Islamic State' after their defeat in 2017. Their name meaning "The State's Army", they are vicious and dangerous criminals who have no issue with running drugs and prostitution to ensnare politicians into blackmail. Veterans of the Islamic State, they are well funded by the State Department of the USA via money laundering through CAIR, the Pentagon and wealthy donors in Qatar, Israel and Saudi Arabia.
Their current "caliph" is Jaufar "Jonathan" Greenblatt, with a bounty of 6,000,000US$ on his head.
I think a flyover is too little. Drop a payload too
As well they shouldn't. Immigration is a federal jurisdiction and a foreign nation forming immigration agreements with a state is a disaster waiting to happen. Just like the US wouldn't bypass Canada to have a border agreement with Alberta.
And you should be glad that it isn't. You want Mexico forming immigration policy directly with California?
Is Texas forming their own immigration policy or are they just following federal immigration policy? Seems like local governance should pretty easily be able to handle border jumpers and not need every single illegal to be handled by the feds.
Maybe I put it poorly. These policies are between nations. When the Sherriff Dept. of Random County, TX shows up at the border and says, "take this guy," it shouldn't be surprising if Mexico's response is, "we have a repatriation agreements with the US government, but who the fuck are you?"
https://www.dhs.gov/publication/updated-us-mexico-local-repatriation-arrangements
Everything with national borders is a pain in the ass, even when it should be easy. Practically, local LEO drops their asses at a CBP, ICE, USBP station and they get processed and deported from there. There's no direct repatriation agreement between the state of Texas and Mexico.