He wouldn't have anyone to whine at if he went there.
No, seriously. The "newest" thread is over 6 months old;
posted 7 months
It had 2 upvotes, and 0 comments, not even a "this place is dead" meta analysis.
Before than it's 2 threads 11 months old. He, and other trolls only work if they have an audience, or like parasites a host to work off. If he left he'd fall immediately into irrelevance faster than Michelle Williams after she left Destiny's Child.
Right now, he's doing what George W. Bush did in Iraq, with even less justification, for the interests of another country, without the required authorization, dissing his own Director of National Intelligence in the process because she told the truth.
F--- that. I'll back him once he starts behaving himself.
It's actually not constitutional. No matter how they dress it up as "intervention," "police action," "international law enforcement" etc, the preemptive use of military action is by definition an act of war and the President cannot declare war without approval from Congress.
Frankly, with what I have seen of what these schmucks consider to be a "victory" condition, I am quite content with them backing losers. It means we can safety leave them in the dust as we continue to win.
Here, let me help you: https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction
Don't come back.
He wouldn't have anyone to whine at if he went there.
No, seriously. The "newest" thread is over 6 months old;
It had 2 upvotes, and 0 comments, not even a "this place is dead" meta analysis.
Before than it's 2 threads 11 months old. He, and other trolls only work if they have an audience, or like parasites a host to work off. If he left he'd fall immediately into irrelevance faster than Michelle Williams after she left Destiny's Child.
You mean israel's interests
Oh shut up.
yes lets support the guys whose right on ONE thing over the guy who did one thing wrong
Why should anyone back someone who's doing wrong?
Right now, he's doing what George W. Bush did in Iraq, with even less justification, for the interests of another country, without the required authorization, dissing his own Director of National Intelligence in the process because she told the truth.
F--- that. I'll back him once he starts behaving himself.
Constitutional, yes.
The correct approach in this case, no fucking way.
It's actually not constitutional. No matter how they dress it up as "intervention," "police action," "international law enforcement" etc, the preemptive use of military action is by definition an act of war and the President cannot declare war without approval from Congress.
Frankly, with what I have seen of what these schmucks consider to be a "victory" condition, I am quite content with them backing losers. It means we can safety leave them in the dust as we continue to win.