They’re still carrying on about crossing state lines. I know that’s important for establishing whether a crime is in the federal or state jurisdiction but since when is that so important for establishing whether something was a crime at all? I’m sure John Oliver, Rachel Maddow, or some other libtarded pundit brought it up and so these people haven’t bothered to question it.
The 'crossing state lines' thing is to make it sound like Kyle traveled halfway across the country to be there (like the BLM rioters), obfuscating the fact that Kenosha is right on the border of Wisconsin and Illinois. Kyle lived in Antioch, Illinois which is less than 20 miles from Kenosha. How much of this is just bad faith or genuine ignorance of the facts is unknown.
I think it's to say "this wasn't even his city" (even though he worked there), and that he only went there to create trouble.
But anyway, you must not assume that people repeat talking points for any logical reason. How often have you heard "Russia invaded a NEIGHBORING country". The morons don't even question whether it's more justified to invade a 'neighboring' country that can pose a threat to you, or one on the other side of the world.
He asked what the difference between him and Karmello
Kyle was defending himself. He didn't go somewhere he wasn't wanted and then murder someone when he was asked to leave. Even when he was attacked by a pedophile, he retreated first until he could no longer.
With Kyle's case, he volunteered himself to protect property in a presumably hostile environment (or seeing from the other side, open carried to oppose a presumed peaceful protest). Obviously the property owner would be glad for this, but regressives would tell you that Kyle didn't belong there just like Karmello.
Kyle was attacked with deadly physical force first, which is what made charging him prosecutorial over reach. Karmello Antony was not attacked with deadly physical force, at all, which makes his self defense claim absolute garbage.
Use of deadly physical force must be in response to actions that makes the defender reasonably believe they were in imminent risk of loss of life, or serious injury. This NEVER HAPPENED in the case of Karmello Antony.
Karmello is getting black privilege in this case, and it is f***ing disgusting.
Check out his Twitter. He asked what the difference between him and Karmello is and lefties flipped their shit in the replies
They’re still carrying on about crossing state lines. I know that’s important for establishing whether a crime is in the federal or state jurisdiction but since when is that so important for establishing whether something was a crime at all? I’m sure John Oliver, Rachel Maddow, or some other libtarded pundit brought it up and so these people haven’t bothered to question it.
The 'crossing state lines' thing is to make it sound like Kyle traveled halfway across the country to be there (like the BLM rioters), obfuscating the fact that Kenosha is right on the border of Wisconsin and Illinois. Kyle lived in Antioch, Illinois which is less than 20 miles from Kenosha. How much of this is just bad faith or genuine ignorance of the facts is unknown.
I think it's to say "this wasn't even his city" (even though he worked there), and that he only went there to create trouble.
But anyway, you must not assume that people repeat talking points for any logical reason. How often have you heard "Russia invaded a NEIGHBORING country". The morons don't even question whether it's more justified to invade a 'neighboring' country that can pose a threat to you, or one on the other side of the world.
He worked there, and I think his dad lived there.
He lived there too. He lived with his dad in the summers and his dad lived there. Also it was like 15 minutes from his mom's
It was Anna Kasparian, and even she eventually figured out that crossing state lines means literally nothing.
Even Flufferboy2000, the prosecutor, didn't bring it up because it doesn't really do anything to help his argument.
It's because they're fucking retards who don't know the law but parrot things that they saw the media emphasize
Kyle was defending himself. He didn't go somewhere he wasn't wanted and then murder someone when he was asked to leave. Even when he was attacked by a pedophile, he retreated first until he could no longer.
With Kyle's case, he volunteered himself to protect property in a presumably hostile environment (or seeing from the other side, open carried to oppose a presumed peaceful protest). Obviously the property owner would be glad for this, but regressives would tell you that Kyle didn't belong there just like Karmello.
Here's a difference: Kyle left when someone physically accosted him.
Well, he tried anyways.
Kyle was defending himself from a lynching. That's the difference.
Kyle was attacked with deadly physical force first, which is what made charging him prosecutorial over reach. Karmello Antony was not attacked with deadly physical force, at all, which makes his self defense claim absolute garbage.
Use of deadly physical force must be in response to actions that makes the defender reasonably believe they were in imminent risk of loss of life, or serious injury. This NEVER HAPPENED in the case of Karmello Antony.
Karmello is getting black privilege in this case, and it is f***ing disgusting.