https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
Hermesmann v. Seyer was a precedent-setting Kansas, United States, case in which Colleen Hermesmann successfully argued that a woman is entitled to sue the father of her child for child support even if conception occurred as a result of a criminal act committed by the woman.[2][3] The case was brought in her name by the then Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services.
Colleen Hermesmann was a 16-year-old babysitter who in 1987 was hired to take care of 12-year-old Shane Seyer. The two began a sexual relationship, and when Hermesmann was 17 and Seyer was 13, the former became pregnant. The baby, a daughter, was born in 1989. Criminal charges were brought against Hermesmann by Shawnee County, Kansas, accusing her of "engaging in the act of sexual intercourse with a child under sixteen". Hermesmann ultimately took a plea bargain, pleading guilty to the lesser offense of "contributing to a child's misconduct".
In 1991, the Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services, in Hermesmann's name, took Seyer to court seeking child support. Hermesmann's criminal culpability was not addressed in this trial, as this was purely a civil court case. The Department also sought and was awarded $7,000, equivalent to $16,200 in 2024,[4] for its own costs.
And the ones mentioned here:
In 1996, the court heard the case of County of San Luis Obispo v. Nathaniel J in which a 34-year-old woman became pregnant after sexually exploiting a 15-year-old boy. He was also forced to pay child support, and then Deputy Attorney General Mary Roth alleged:
Imp doesnt give a fuck. Do you actually think he is genuine? if he is genuine he would acknowledge which ethnic group is disproportionately responsible for leading feminist movements. but he doesnt and defends them at every turn.
The first wave feminists who were the suffragettes were predominantly WASPs, not Jews
The second wave feminists who led the sexual revolution that legalized porn were Jews
I was reading Battle Cry of Freedom, regarded as one of the best single volume histories on the Civil War, and in the opening chapters the author goes into how changes in technology gave women more free time.
Apparently, the result was that the first half of the 1800s saw an explosion in women's literacy and college attendance. These newly educated middle class women were the vanguard of the most militant abolitionism.
So, we can now blame bored housewives for the civil war, the temperance movement and prohibition, as well as the general decline in society post World War II. Is there anything they can't ruin?
They ruined absolute paradise created by God. Their very nature seems to be ruination.
This. The tiny hats have a lot to answer for, but... There is something wrong with Anglos. Anglo women in particular seem to have a lot of hatred for men. Anglo culture has coddled them for a very long time and produced a lot of the material we call blue pill. Spoiled "sweet", women are wiser, women are more in tune with their nature, women are more inherently good, etc.
He is as genuine as you are.
A man so convinced of the evil of X group that he cannot and will not hear a single thing besides that. By blaming Jews, to him that diminishes the blame and evil of women. His obsession overrides rationality.
Now now, you know they can't see their own reflection in the mirror
True, but its very funny to remind them of how much more similar they are to people they hate and whine about than they are to the "superior peoples" they claim to be protecting.
As I often told Imp, he argues like a woman, and even a Feminist, more than he does anything resembling a man.
What's extra funny is the "post limit" rule was introduced mostly because of Imp, and the guy trying to imply "he is totally a fake, a shill and a forum slider" is currently having to post around that every day.
Funny irony there.