Japan's Osaka High Court rules country's same-sex marriage ban 'unconstitutional'
Japan's Osaka High Court ruled Tuesday that the country's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, following similar rulings in the high courts of Sapparo, Tokyo, Fukuoka and Nagoya.
Seems the funds haven't run out yet to push this through Japanese legislature.
I say this as someone used to be ambivalent to gay marriage as a 'whatever' issue not realising till later how insidious it is as it's applying a unnatural concept (gays can't reproduce on their own) to a religious institution. It's a discreet thin wedge to shove more leftist concepts in behind it.
Im going to be honest, there's probably no stopping this without the entire globalist system being overthrown worldwide.
Remember the Japanese constitution was written by American jews
Wait, I may be misremembering, but didn't Trump recently talk about reevaluating the Japanese constitution on the basis of military rearmament?
Longshot but maybe change a few things her and there to stop this while everyone is too focused on the Japanese getting superior firepower.
The thing about that is im pretty sure the deep state in general wants to use Japan to fight China. https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17rT26YBDK/the-american-government-website-/c/ According to the American government website, during Biden's time, they were pushing LGBT crap in Japan AND they were pushing for Japan to increase their military spending.
Im not saying Japan shouldn't increase their defence but it should be noted that both sides aren't fully trust worthy. Why isn't Trump advocating for Japan to get rid of article 14 in the constitution which is the most woke article that pushes "equality of sexes and race" for example?
Let's be honest, even WITH the team he's got working with him, he still has a MOUNTAIN to dismantle at home in the US.
At least DOGE is cutting off NGO money which helps ease the pressure indirectly, maybe he'll have more time to do something like that if they finally go after one of these traitorous judges through the legislature so they back off.
Im just saying if Trump is saying stuff about reevaluating the Japanese constitution, he should have talked about getting rid of article 14 as well not just talking about rearmment.
Oh i see. Kill males in the war, replace them with immigrants. Devalue women, make them lust after degeneracy.
This. Not enough to defund USAID. Gotta pressure countries to stop cooperating with 'the liberal world order'.
Firstly article 9 and secondly they've been trying since the 90s to no avail, too many peace doves on both sides of the aisle.
Of course. Why would the jews give up just because one country shows some potential to slip out of their control?
Any names?
Beate Sirota Gordon
OK, so you say "Jews" but named one, and are also lying that one 22-year-old girl "wrote it". So when an entire group of people writes something, you pick a junior staffer who is a member of a demographic you don't like, and claim that this person "wrote it", eh?
You can hardly get even dumber than you are.
You are anti gentile, so i don't really care what you think . And she was the one who wrote the worst article in the constitution (article 14) which forbids discrimination against people. She was a literal nobody yet for some reason was given the power to write in the Japanese constitution. Why is that i wonder?
Lmao he's correct though. Yall have to stop with the bullshit over exaggerating. She's a literal nobody the same way you are and yet if you were a staffer you'd end up helping write parts of the constitution because you happened to be in that place in that time.
OK, so you tried to prove your claims, and failed miserably. You didn't talk about any article, you talked about 'the constitution', and you claimed 'Jews' (which is plural) did it.
Pretty sure 22-year-old junior staffers weren't making decisions for themselves, genius. But you're a retard, we get it.
They say that Japan is 10 years behind the west when it comes to trends, and that definitely applies here. Same sex marriage was legalized in the US on June 26, 2015.
Many in Japan have taken the propaganda and don't see the danger in eroding the very definition of marriage (a man and a wife joined for the sake of family).
Japan currently has the lowest rate of births out of wedlock, but at this rate with the influx of foreigners they are on the death spiral too.
The countries in a demographic death spiral are doing the most to promote contraception, homosexuality, transgenderism, abortion and so called euthanasia.
You don't have to be against all of these to find this strange. Of course, both the demographic decline and the promotion of these has a common cause.
Water?
And it's against rule 16 to say it.
funny how they always have signs in plain English
yes goy, this is clearly a japanese protest, quit analyzing it!
Fujoshis and their consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
At this rate only 3 types of countries are resistant to American leftism: the ones that bankroll it, the ones that will kill you for pushing it and the ones at the top of its totem pole.
In reality these courts agree that both same sex marriage and ban on same sex marriage are unconstitutional. Former is based on vague interpretation of equality to happiness clauses and the latter is based on the very definition of marriage in constitution. The only thing they can do is to change the constitution, but the progressives don't want reformation of army and anti espionage changes because of peace and human rights and shit which the center and right want in exchange. So everyone is at an impasse.
But that is a violation of fundamental precepts of law - the principle of lex specialis.
If there is an actual definition in the constitution, these judges are being even more lawless than usual.
第二十四条 婚姻は、両性の合意のみに基いて成立し、夫婦が同等の権利を有することを基本として、相互の協力により、維持されなければならない。
The Americans fucked up by using gendered language. Back then they were focused on equality of genders and abolishing the patriarchy.
That seems pretty definitive. 両性の合意のみに基いて成立 - 'established solely on the basis of consent between both sexes'. There should be no constitutional way around this. Gay marriage would be consent between one sex.
The classic feminist pitfall of trying to protect muh wimminz from everything but being unable to avoid enshrining traditional concepts of gender at the same time.
gotta remember, there are different camps of feminists, and the pro and anti camps are like catholics vs eastern orthodox, and get along almost as well as muslims and jews.
Nitpick: more like Muslims and a different sect of Muslims.
fair, lol.
This is how it starts. Well, actually, this is decades after how it starts, but still a very visible road marker.
Japan, save yourselves!
outlaw marriage licenses.
government should have no place in religious or personal ceremonies...
Japan has officially hit the end.
I feel like a time traveler, who has seen first hand the slippery slope this has lead to and feel compelled to franticly warn them of their folly.
This faggot shit is an abomination. Faggots will go to hell!
The East has fallen, It's so over.
Stop the noticing and upheaval of cultures
Nothing says ''foreing influence'' like putting English front, center and 3 times the size of the Japanese text.
Comment Reported for: Rule 15 - Slurs
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks